;
  • Report:  #1472450

Complaint Review: Fasterville Pa. - Feasterville PA

Reported By:
- Feasterville, United States
Submitted:
Updated:

Fasterville Pa.
Feasterville, PA, United States
Web:
http://lowersouthamptontownship.org/
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?

It is time to stand up and ask the tough questions! - Why was this zoning change granted despite all the evidence demonstrating this change to be against the local resident's/taxpayer's interests? - Why, was this zoning change granted despite a taxpayer-funded traffic study concluded that such a change was dangerous and unwarranted in or around 2008. Was the Planning Commission acting in the best interests of the residents of Lower Southampton, or were they motivated by undue financial pressure to increase tax revenues, or worse, outright bribery?

Please, stand up for yourselves and your neighbors by calling YOUR Lower Southampton Board of Supervisors; The Lower Southampton Supervisors can be reached, telling them to stop wiping their butts with the constitution! 215-357-7300. "The three men had a long and tangled history in law enforcement and Republican politics in their Bucks County township”. "One was a district judge, another a deputy county constable, the third the public safety director in Lower Southampton Township”. "Township Manager John McMenamin said Wednesday, a day after Lower Southampton supervisors fired Hoopes. "Nobody knew anything was going on." Not a fact Michael C. Mister, Kevin Reilly Knew and where working for hand and hand as I was told with officials of Lower Southampton.

In 2015 Michael C. Mister brags to me that he paid $400.000.00 to get the spot zoning. the paper trail shows just that! "The township has been left shocked by the allegations”. "Republican politics” I feel overlooked Judge shopping, sill in the unified justice system let`s name name`s so You and the do your part to contact and ask tough questions of all named in this document. Attorney for the Commonwealth Bucks County District Attorney: Matthew D. Weintraub and Appeals Officer Karen A. Diaz. HONORABLE JUDGE ALBERT J. CEPPARULO HONORABLE JUDGE ALBERT J. CEPPARULO was removed replaced by HONORABLE JUDGE DIANE E. GIBBONS. HONORABLE JUDGE DIANE E. GIBBONS HONORABLE JUDGE WALLACE BATEMAN REASSIGNED. April 8 2016.

Following is the list of Witnesses who testified on behalf of the Defendant and was later included in the Defendants because of non-compliance with the ordinance of the Municipality and inappropriate use of its provisions • Michael E. Peters, Esq., • Michael T. Pidgeon, Esq., • Michael J. Savona, Esq., • Eastburn & Gray, Doylestown, PA, Mr. Robert Hoopes Esq. Honorable Judge Gene E.K. Pratter, James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse 601 Market Street. The FBI and the DOJ should be all over the Spot zoning of 8 N. Westview Ave why because of the dates and time of the documentation made by officials of lower Southampton like Mr. Robert Hoopes Esq, Michael J. Savona, Esq, Michael E. Peters, Esq, John A.Vanluvanee Esq working with Carol Drioil ex zoning officer. Honorable Judge Gene E.K. Pratter, James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse 601 Market Street. New facts are just coming to light.

The indictment and actions: of Mr. Robert Hoopes Esq., demonstrates a conflict of interest in political channels acting with Eastburn & Gray and Michael C. Mister. It has been the cardinal principle of legal procedure to share the evidence with the opposite party, which was missing in this case. Rule 26(a) is reproduced herein: Rule 26(a): Parties are required to share evidence supporting their case without being requested by the opposite party. The Court ruled that the Petitioner did not state a cognizable claim or any claim because he’s not precognition of event, especially foreknowledge that came to light in late 2018.

Following the Legal Precedents which supports the case of the Petitioner: Violations of ordinances of this municipality: LEXSEE 404 U.S. 519, AT 521 HAINES v. KERNER ET AL. No. 70-5025 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HAINES v. KERNER ET AL. Plaintiff: "Allegations, we conclude that he is entitled to an opportunity to offer proof. The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith”. Legal conclusions should entitle me to an opportunity to offer proof also in full use of outstanding motions (s). Peter Sauers, the Plaintiff Filed 8-17-2015 at 10:18 AM: to the Court of Common Pleas for the same fundamental constitutional right to tender evidence in this court system was denied because of false statements made and the original action was reinstated.

The altered were remade and looked at online for Michael C. Mister. 3. Exhibit three: ORDER ENTERED PM 4-18-16 BY JUDGE BATEMAN, JR. DEFTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ARE SUSTAINED, AND PLTFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THIS ORDER/JUDGMENT WAS DOCKETED AND SENT ON 05/02/2016 PURSUANT TO PA. R. C. P. 236. 5/ 2/ 2016 A final decision of the Common Pleas of Bucks County. As needed. 4. Exhibit four: ADOPTED and approved this 12th day of April 2017. LOWER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP RESOLUTION NO. 2017- 20 Tax Parcel Nos. 21- 003- 114 and 21- 003- 111. Matching Exhibits one, two, three. (A) Township Record. Showing no legal ripeness. LOWER SOUTHAMPTON TAXPAYERS SWINDLED



Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//