Complaint Review: Regent University School Of Law - Virginia Beach Virginia

ROBERTSON, REGENT MUST STAND TRIAL IN LIBEL SUIT JUDGE DENIES MOTION TO THROW OUT SUIT BY LAW PROFESSORS Pat Robertson and Regent University must stand trial for a scathing 1994 letter that Robertson wrote about some rebellious Regent law professors, a judge ruled Thursday. Judge Edward W. Hanson Jr. said parts of the letter are ''pretty damaging'' to the professors' reputations, but he will let a jury decide if the letter is libelous. Three Regent law professors are suing Robertson and Regent for $10 million each. They claim the letter, which compared them with Branch Davidians and cult leader Jim Jones, irreparably hurt their reputations. The five-page letter was widely circulated at Regent and later published in The Virginian-Pilot. It blasted a group of nine law professors, three of whom - Roger Bern, Paul Morken and Jeffrey Tuomala - sued. On Thursday, Hanson denied a motion by Robertson and Regent to throw out the lawsuit. Robertson and the university argued that the letter was simply opinion, not provable fact, and therefore was constitutionally protected speech. Hanson also denied Robertson's motion to be dismissed personally from the lawsuit. Robertson's attorney argued that Regent's founder is immune from nearly all lawsuits because he is an unpaid chancellor at a tax-exempt university. The Virginia immunity statute is intended to protect volunteer charity workers from most liability in performing good works. The immunity does not apply, however, in cases of ''willful misconduct.'' The professors argue that Robertson's letter ''reeks of willful misconduct.'' Hanson did not rule directly on that issue, but he cited three paragraphs in the letter that ''certainly provide a jury question, in my opinion, as to whether there is willful misconduct.'' The judge said other parts of the letter may also raise the ''willful misconduct'' issue for jurors. Hanson cited paragraphs in which Robertson wrote that the rebellious professors were: ''Myopic,'' ''lacking in common sense'' and ''inept as lawyers.'' ''Not capable teachers of law'' and ''third-rate minds.'' ''Extremist fanatics'' and not ''rational persons'' because they had filed complaints with the American Bar Association. ''Only cultists after the order of Jim Jones or the Branch Davidians do such things,'' Robertson wrote. The controversy began when Robertson fired law school dean Herbert Titus in July 1993. Most of the law school faculty rallied behind Titus. Some complained to the ABA that Titus' firing violated the school's tenure system. Titus later sued Robertson and others with ties to Regent. That lawsuit is set for trial in August in Virginia Beach. On Feb. 22, 1994, Robertson wrote the disputed letter to one law professor. He sent copies to Regent's president, provost and new law dean, with a postscript, ''Please feel free to share this letter with your colleagues on the faculty.'' In the letter, Robertson claimed that the rebellious professors wanted to sabotage the law school's ABA accreditation efforts or have the school ''crippled or closed down.'' He said that was professional suicide, comparable to the actions of Jim Jones or the Branch Davidians. At Thursday's court hearing, the judge responded harshly to an argument by a Regent attorney that Robertson had a legal right to write the letter. Hanson again cited the part of the letter that referred to the professors as ''not capable teachers of law'' and ''third-rate minds.'' ''Pretty damaging to a law professor, isn't it?'' the judge said. ''And this, of course, was written by a man who is a lawyer and well aware of the power of words.'' Later, Hanson returned to this argument: For a law professor trying to find a job, Hanson said, ''What could be more damaging than a letter from the chancellor saying he's not a competent teacher and has a third-rate mind?'' But a lawyer for Robertson argued that Robertson had a responsibility to write the letter in response to the ''absolute revolution'' and ''mutiny'' in the law school at the time. ''This is something these professors, this gang of eight, brought on themselves. . . ,'' argued the attorney, Glen A. Huff. ''The chancellor has a fiduciary duty to do something, to point out the craziness that was going on.'' Earlier in the hearing, the judge wondered out loud whether jurors might not read another message into the letter, given the running feud between Robertson and the professors. ''Is there an inference in the context that this could be spite?'' Hanson asked. Hanson scheduled the case for trial for Feb. 3. ILLUSTRATION: Photo Judge Edward W. Henson Jr.

Dear Lynnwood, How many evidences are admissable in the Court? Have you taken your Evidence Act already? What evidence is not admissable in US Court System? All my substantial evidences are the possession of OCR at US Department of Education. Please go and check with them. They are involved in mail theft too. They will get caught soon. Those peoples are under investigation. 1.4M is too little for this case, it should be more than that.

Dear Lynn, I know who you are. Did you take evidence law? The only evidence inadmissable in the US Court is "Dying Declaration." All my evidences are in OCR under US Department of Education. Are you a Burmese lady who is studying at Regent University School of Law? You should be careful when you are responding someone's sincere report.

You need to post links to your evidence. 1.4M is going to need more than a good talk. Where is it?

Dear Consumer Advocates, SDA peoples are the followers of Ellen G. White. Have you ever read about White Lies. The investigator of Office of Civil Rights Office for Texas was gone and Thomas M. Diggs and accomplice were removed because of their lies. I hope that it has been proved for what you are trying to believe.

Dear Consumer Advocates, SDA peoples are the followers of Ellen G. White. Have you ever read about White Lies? The investigator at Office for Civil Rights for Texas was gone because of their lies, besides Thomas M. Diggs and accomplice were removed. I hope this information proved what you are trying to believe.

WOWWY! Kai, looks as if you have done this crap before! same poorly used words different names. i plan to forward your NEW issues to your OLD school so they can use it against you moron! Burger King is calling you Kai! run! Kai's 1999 letter..... "According to the brochure of the School, President Marvin Anderson is responsible for racism and Affirmative Action, but there is no improvement occurred. Therefore I request you that please kindly investigate on my complaint. I am asking to have the following remedies because of their unfair practices according to the promulgated law. * Spirit-filled persons must replace Steve Stafford, Jerry Potter, Dr. Robert McChesney, and Dr. Thomas Bunch. Otherwise, unfair practice will be continued. * The School should have ombudsperson, International Student Organization, and Grievance Committee. * Mr. Michael Wong's (from China) case should be reversed and readmitted. * My final grade on Economics should be changed. * The School should get injunction letter on their unfair practices of discrimination. * The School is responsible for what I had put all my resources in my education at SWAU. Sincerely yours, Kai K. Mong 5944-202 Jake Sears Circle Virginia Beach, VA 23464 (757) 493-9858

Hello Kai, I'm reading this report kind of late but I did feel horrible for you after reading all that you went through at Regent's University. You had me convinced that the Prof. was definitely racist. Then, I decided to search further online and see if you won your case or what was going on with it and I found another site with another complaint against another Christian University called Southwestern Adventist University @ www.multiracial.com/letters/kaimong.com seems to me like you are making up stories and using racism as a weapon to discredit christian universities. I am also a minority and it saddens me that racism is now the weapon being used to fight christians. If you are not a christian then good for you but do not lie and try to discredit these people. You are destroying lives and wasting tax payers dollars if they have to keep investigating when you make false complaints but you obviously don't care. I hope everyone who reads this checks out the website www.multiracial.com/letters/kaimong.html To those who wrote all those mean things to Kai, it's sad that you should write such hateful words. Is it funny that some people have to work in sweatshops or have to work at macdonalds. Just because this person may be lying does not mean that everyone that moves to the U.S from a different country are here to just be lazy and get free money. Those comments were obviously ignorant and heartless. Do you honestly think people want to move out of their country to a foreign land? People only move here because they don't have a choice. You should be glad you are not in their situation and stop making fun of it, a lot of people who see refuge in this great country are here because the have suffered in their country... To the Regent University student who commented earlier, how sad it is that you would comment in the way you did. Isn't Regent suppose to be a Christian University. Where was God's love in your comments to Kai? Lastly, Kai, you need prayers, I hope that God touches your heart and that you begin to realize that without God, without a vision in life you will never find peace. You cannot find peace in lying and making up stories. I hope that you will find a way to have peace within yourself and move on. One day you will have to apologize to the Proffessor you probably got fired. I wish you well in your future and I hope you actually get to read this. ~Concerned Reader.

Dear John, I am not Evangelical Fundamentalist.They are hypocrites. Look Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell and Moon. I will not represent this false teaching and hypocrisy to the world. I don't against any religion. I love everybody. I am ashamed of who proclaim but hypocrites. Therefore I don't trust many missionaries who proclaim Christians.

It would seem apparent from your correspondence, the would be applicant was not attuned to nor did he have any interest in the mission of Regent. Nor in alleging conspiracies and klan affiliation and cc'ing everyone but B'nai Brith, the wherewithal to have a prayer of getting through law school.

Dear Bradley, I don't want to work in Pizza hut. I used to work in Neighbor's pizzeria, and they are crooked. Watch out! This business will be closing again like LL.M at Regent University. If you need ajob, let me know, this is a very demanding job. But you have to be really smart. Answer these questions: * What is the difference between illegal and unlawful? * When you want to sleep, you have to go to your bed? Why? If you pass this quiz, and I will give you a bj. Thanks,

Hey Kai, you have done very well in ending international programme at your skewl.. I am much proud of you and would like to offer you job...Let me know if you are interested in job! ok?

Thnks to Jackie! Dear Jackie, I have learned that Thomas M. Digg was removed from Regent University, and LL.M programme was shut down. Whoever wants to complete their studie, they have to transfer to St. Thomas University in Miami. My former professor is the director of the programme at there. Prof.William Byrne. I am waiting for their response, and also I am preparing to send the copy of my letter to American Society of International law. Thanks, Blessings!

Dear Robin, Thanks for your advice. Kai

Kai, Please pay no attention to "Bradley", he is one more in a "series" of Internet trolls that see fit to come here and spread ridiculous nonsense. His "business associates" are no doubt among some of the scam companies reported here, or his co-workers at Pizza Hut, where he claims to have worked. Although he seeks to blast your language skills, I find your report much more intelligible than this jumbled rebuttal "Bradley" has sent. "Bradley" seems to think he has some God-given right to cast stones, amazing! "Bradley" now has his very own Rip-off Report filed under the "Blabber Mouth" category, so if it is notoriety he seeks, he now has it. Stick with the consumer advocate, Jacqueline, and things may work out for the better. Most of the folks coming to this site are honest and have good intentions. But there are always some that seek to tear down any honest, good endeavor. Separate the wheat from the chaff...and I hope you are able to achieve a good outcome.

Sukai, I am here to help you... First off, listen to me. Me and "business associates" are looking into your situation for you. We believe indeed you may have a case. You will "kick americans a*s!" when this all comes through. But first you need to work on your credibility (and your english). While we are reviewing your case, I have arranged job for you, (you need to have job to show that you are not wasting your time) and to gain some credentials. More on that in a minute. As you know, visa requirements are VERY strict. Any idle time in U.S. is counted AGAINST YOU...So as you probably already know most "i-9ers" need to exit the country for a time and then reenter to keep clock from ticking. We have arranged new passport for you and spending cash as well. Dont worry, when we get your situation resolved for you, we will be reimbursed, so you will OWE US NOTHING!!. I am here to extend my services to you as YOU HAVE BEEN WRONGED!... We have arranged very DEMANDING job for you in the very COMPETITIVE sporting wear market.. you can start IMMEDIATELY upon arrival and you will be earning CREDENTIALS to help your case when you reenter america! YELLOW POWER!!! It always saddens me to see the little man get the short end of the stick!!! End this RACISM NOW!!! I WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY CREDIT FOR THIS!!!

You might need an International Lawyer to consider your case, not necessarily to pursue this in court, but for consultation. It sounds like you accomplished a worthy and successful transfer of a 3.0 G.P.A., in regard to your credit transfer from Rangoon University to Recency. This puts your native university in good standing for global marketability, but most important provided a good foundation. This does not happen with any university in the world, there are standards that have to be met. You might already know the United Kingdoms standards are even more challenging than America's. At this point, I would not recommend giving out any more information on the Internet, because this could damage the validity of your evidence, and overall case, on the very remote possibility you do appear in court. Some Judges dismiss all or any publicized information, as no longer admissable. The reasons for this decision can vary. This is NOT to imply you shouldn't have submitted a Report, but if you were considering other sites, it could pose a problem in the long term. You can access www.asil.org, for the Guide to Electronic Resources for International Law. I suggest this because of combining documentation from two different countries, and to possibly find an International Lawyer. The lawyer has to understand the documentation and laws of both countries, in order to know what specific assistance you require. This Report, your Grievance Letter, submitted does not specify any record of definite and essential documentation. If your grades were altered, or concealed do you have a copy of the transcripts? If you received certificates confirming your advanced grade point average, through email or otherwise then, you should have a print form reserved for your case file to build evidence. It does not matter if they lost, concealed or missplaced documents, if you know you have valid multiple copies. This is not a supplement for legal advice, and you should seriously consider seeking legal council. Again, consider contacting at least on of the professionals from your correspondance copy list. Close to a year ago, when I first discovered this site, the draw was in the ED's statement about this being a Human Rights Media Agency. Human Rights are not always apparent, in the world, but this site gave me hope. Please understand the unedited nature of the site, which can sometimes give the wrong impression. Despite the previous Rebuttals, this is NOT a site consisting of hateful, shallow, and narrow minded bigots. There is something going on at The Rip-off Report, of which these people have no clue, and now you are permanently included in the industrious part, to help consumers. There may be someone out there in a similar experience, who can now benefit from your allotment. At the least, YOU have contributed, while the others have nothing to offer. Please get back to us on this one. Thank you.

You might need an International Lawyer to consider your case, not necessarily to pursue this in court, but for consultation. It sounds like you accomplished a worthy and successful transfer of a 3.0 G.P.A., in regard to your credit transfer from Rangoon University to Recency. This puts your native university in good standing for global marketability, but most important provided a good foundation. This does not happen with any university in the world, there are standards that have to be met. You might already know the United Kingdoms standards are even more challenging than America's. At this point, I would not recommend giving out any more information on the Internet, because this could damage the validity of your evidence, and overall case, on the very remote possibility you do appear in court. Some Judges dismiss all or any publicized information, as no longer admissable. The reasons for this decision can vary. This is NOT to imply you shouldn't have submitted a Report, but if you were considering other sites, it could pose a problem in the long term. You can access www.asil.org, for the Guide to Electronic Resources for International Law. I suggest this because of combining documentation from two different countries, and to possibly find an International Lawyer. The lawyer has to understand the documentation and laws of both countries, in order to know what specific assistance you require. This Report, your Grievance Letter, submitted does not specify any record of definite and essential documentation. If your grades were altered, or concealed do you have a copy of the transcripts? If you received certificates confirming your advanced grade point average, through email or otherwise then, you should have a print form reserved for your case file to build evidence. It does not matter if they lost, concealed or missplaced documents, if you know you have valid multiple copies. This is not a supplement for legal advice, and you should seriously consider seeking legal council. Again, consider contacting at least on of the professionals from your correspondance copy list. Close to a year ago, when I first discovered this site, the draw was in the ED's statement about this being a Human Rights Media Agency. Human Rights are not always apparent, in the world, but this site gave me hope. Please understand the unedited nature of the site, which can sometimes give the wrong impression. Despite the previous Rebuttals, this is NOT a site consisting of hateful, shallow, and narrow minded bigots. There is something going on at The Rip-off Report, of which these people have no clue, and now you are permanently included in the industrious part, to help consumers. There may be someone out there in a similar experience, who can now benefit from your allotment. At the least, YOU have contributed, while the others have nothing to offer. Please get back to us on this one. Thank you.

You might need an International Lawyer to consider your case, not necessarily to pursue this in court, but for consultation. It sounds like you accomplished a worthy and successful transfer of a 3.0 G.P.A., in regard to your credit transfer from Rangoon University to Recency. This puts your native university in good standing for global marketability, but most important provided a good foundation. This does not happen with any university in the world, there are standards that have to be met. You might already know the United Kingdoms standards are even more challenging than America's. At this point, I would not recommend giving out any more information on the Internet, because this could damage the validity of your evidence, and overall case, on the very remote possibility you do appear in court. Some Judges dismiss all or any publicized information, as no longer admissable. The reasons for this decision can vary. This is NOT to imply you shouldn't have submitted a Report, but if you were considering other sites, it could pose a problem in the long term. You can access www.asil.org, for the Guide to Electronic Resources for International Law. I suggest this because of combining documentation from two different countries, and to possibly find an International Lawyer. The lawyer has to understand the documentation and laws of both countries, in order to know what specific assistance you require. This Report, your Grievance Letter, submitted does not specify any record of definite and essential documentation. If your grades were altered, or concealed do you have a copy of the transcripts? If you received certificates confirming your advanced grade point average, through email or otherwise then, you should have a print form reserved for your case file to build evidence. It does not matter if they lost, concealed or missplaced documents, if you know you have valid multiple copies. This is not a supplement for legal advice, and you should seriously consider seeking legal council. Again, consider contacting at least on of the professionals from your correspondance copy list. Close to a year ago, when I first discovered this site, the draw was in the ED's statement about this being a Human Rights Media Agency. Human Rights are not always apparent, in the world, but this site gave me hope. Please understand the unedited nature of the site, which can sometimes give the wrong impression. Despite the previous Rebuttals, this is NOT a site consisting of hateful, shallow, and narrow minded bigots. There is something going on at The Rip-off Report, of which these people have no clue, and now you are permanently included in the industrious part, to help consumers. There may be someone out there in a similar experience, who can now benefit from your allotment. At the least, YOU have contributed, while the others have nothing to offer. Please get back to us on this one. Thank you.

Crispy, I will not go back to Burma, until I saw my dream comes through. My dream is to overcome this RACISM. You have to look back your grand parent's a*****e, check with a glove what kind of a*****e color they belong to. And then come back and tell me. I am not a redneck worshipper or a Klan worshipper. We shall overcome.

Crispy, I will not go back to Burma, until I saw my dream comes through. My dream is to overcome this RACISM. You have to look back your grand parent's a*****e, check with a glove what kind of a*****e color they belong to. And then come back and tell me. I am not a redneck worshipper or a Klan worshipper. We shall overcome.

Crispy, I will not go back to Burma, until I saw my dream comes through. My dream is to overcome this RACISM. You have to look back your grand parent's a*****e, check with a glove what kind of a*****e color they belong to. And then come back and tell me. I am not a redneck worshipper or a Klan worshipper. We shall overcome.

Crispy, I will not go back to Burma, until I saw my dream comes through. My dream is to overcome this RACISM. You have to look back your grand parent's a*****e, check with a glove what kind of a*****e color they belong to. And then come back and tell me. I am not a redneck worshipper or a Klan worshipper. We shall overcome.

Dear Frank, I was born and raised in Burma. We speak British English, but not American English. My English is much better than most of America born Americans. This is not based on my language, but based on my colour and where I am coming from. You must check Herbert Chadbourn's case also. I am not a blue-blood person. If you speak a correct English, I hope you understand. Kai.

You have some options here. This is complicated and to an extent difficult to understand. It doesn't mean you are completely void of finding resolution. All of the request made on your list may not be possible, but most importantly you should be able to receive your diploma. In regard to a tampering of documents, and someone destroying or concealing records, this is why it is vital that you keep records of your own. For example, if you were accepted into the said university, you would have a "Letter of Acceptance" in your personal records. This would serve as your evidence. You could make multiple copies of ALL your records, to keep that information safe. Even if no one was conspiring against you based on race or ethnicity, this should be standard procedure. You Grievance Letter needs editing and a complete re-write. You might consider asking a collegue to assist you. The information you are presenting is unclear, and not just for problems of a language barrier. The chronology of events are not itemized and outlined enough. Civil Court cases depend on this type of presentation. It appears that some of the professionals included in your Correspondance Copy list, might be the very people who can help you to find resolution. The Human Rights Commission of Virginia Beach might be a good place to start. I will get back with more information, but hope you consider assistance from the professionals on the list.

The "enemies don't want to see your success"????? Honey, you are absolutely crazy! Go back to Burma where anyone or any llama can practice law. With grammar such as yours I would never want you to represent me in a courtroom. You move to America so learn to speak, write, and live the American way. You drop the racism card to get things made your way. Yellow power? Do you have newborn jaundice or something? I have never seen a 'yellow' person except my newborn baby. You are a lifetime loser who needs to get over the fact that McDonalds is calling you not Judge Judy. Enjoy the lifetime supply of BigMacs oh mighty yellow one.

Kai: I am a student at Regent University and have never witnessed the type of behavior you have described. I'm sorry that you had a bad experience, but it's really difficult to understand our situation. Perhaps you could get someone to more clearly explain what you believe happened to you. Your grasp of the English language is an obstacle to clear communication. If English is a second language to you, I understand your difficulty and commend your attempt to right a wrong. But unless you can clearly explain how you were wronged, no one can help you.

Dear Tom, I will not work with this kind of racist University. I think if you want to work with them means that you are unemployed. Please try to be nonviolent lynching mob.

Sorry, but you have now proven you are the racisit. "Yellow Power." I have never mentioned the KLAN or anything else. If I am racisit about anything, it is about NON-AMERICAN CITIZENS coming to this country and wanting a whole bunch of something for nothing like you. I dont really care if you are Black, White, Red, Yellow or Green. If you are a US CITIZEN, then you are a AMERICAN like me. You stated you came from "BURMA" so I am assuming you are NOT a US Citizen and therfore not a American. So therfore I may be racisit against you when you come here wanting someone to give you a whole bunch of Money for your LAZY WAYS as you have indicated. Also I definetly dont work for Regent University, now if someone would like to contact me & offer me a Job then I might consider working for them & would be OPEN & HONEST about it. But I would work for what they would pay me. I wouldnt ask them to pay me for sitting around for 3 years & whining like you. Honestly, I believe you need some SERIOUS PSYCHATRIC HELP. I believe you may be delusional and more. You probably should go home & try to rebuild you life. Complaining here & whining about what you percieve as others owing you is a TOTAL CROCK of S***. This place dont owe you anthing like you have asked for. And you sure wouldnt make a very good Lawyer as indicated from your story here. so GO HOME & SHUT UP !!!!!

Suhkai, I dont know if what you are saying is the truth or not, (because most of what you write is unintelligible) but it does prove one thing: "Students" like you are a major HINDRANCE to our school systems. You say you are OWED a degree here (among other things) but you cannot even make your case for it in english. So I cannot even begin to believe you. You people come over here from the Nike sweatshops and just expect everything to be given to you. Then you insult people. If your society is so great what are you doing here? I'll tell you, you want something for nothing, and you dont want to return home, TO NOTHING. The truth is your a hindrance to our school systems-our teachers have to waste their time trying to comprehend you, and now you try to make trouble by involving the legal system, hindering them, and contacting SENATORS??? Do you think they have time for this? or nothing better to do??? You are even a hindrance to this board, as I had to spend time trying to make sense of what you wrote. See what kindof jobs Nike has for you.

Dear Tom d**k, I never heard "the benefit of the doubt," but only "benefit of doubt." Check with legal term dictionary. Your comments are based on Racism. I know that you have a connection with Regent University. Your comments will be directed to some of Civil Rights Organizations. This Regent University and you worked together as conspiracy hate group. You will be reported to FBI. Becareful what you wrote. OK.

Dear Nincompoop, I don't need your response. I am not dealing with that kind of Texan Nincompoop, lazy, and never completed his High School Diploma. I am proud of my national origin, as Asian American. Yellow Power. Kick-out this Klan!

While you may consider me a REDNECK, I consider that to be a compliment. I was Born in Texas & have lived here my entire life & am proudof my heritage. But then look at yourself. You are a LYING, LAZY Thief who wants something for nothing as you have stated in your report. You are probably not even a US Citizen based upon statements in your report (I am giving you the benefit of the doubt here by saying "probably"). And the best rebuttal you can come up with is to criticize my spelling cause of a lack of a integrated spell-check, and to call me a REDNECK. Well I guess once again, I see where the RIP-OFF is, it is YOU & your STUPID DEMANDS !!!! While I dont know this school, I believe they have probably treated you fairly & have tried to work with you. But you want a whole lot of something for nothing. You need to learn that you have to WORK for everything you get in this world & sometimes some of us have to work harder than others just because of fate. So quit your whining & do what you have to do to complete your education (If possible) and get on with your life & quit expecting a FREE HANDOUT !!!!!

Tom, You need to improve your English. You can't even spell "definitely. " Check your spelling again. We don't need redneck in America. Come on!

You have got to be kidding. You have to be a GRADE A, Number 1 IDIOT. It is apparent from your letter, you have poor English Grammer and are probably not even a US CITIZEN. To think that they should PAY you for 3 years without working & Guarentee you a job is beyond STUPID. You DEFINETLY need that Psychatric Evaluation cause I am not sure you are LEGALLY SANE. If you really believe that you are entitled to what you have asked for, you need to be locked up, Deported and BARRED from ever entering this Country again. Now I am more likely to believe, the UNIVERSITY was scammed by you & they deserve compensation from you for all this harrasement you are waging against them. So go get your Head Examined & a job at McDonalds or something back in Burma. We dont want you & Durn sure dont need you !!!!!!