Randy
Kensington,#2Consumer Comment
Tue, November 22, 2005
It looks like the house fo cards at Cashnow.com is about to come blowing down in the wake of the recent hurricanes. I see MR. Zecevic -the founder, CEO, Know it all, Master, Sheister, CAnt touch me, is finally being replaced at the helm by a new CEO. Does anyone think Mr. Price has any idea what kind of snakes den he has just walk into? I want to address John the big investor whom claimed this was a company with a market cap in excess of 50 million dollars whom never responded to my questions of how marklet cap is defined. Are you still buying this dog? You were warned to dump this dog at .23 now it as .15 and with a new CEO. Does he have any experience in the rapidly changing payday loan business? What happened to Miro and Andrea? Why were they replaced as CEO and President-The press release only states they were replaced but with no explanation. Does any one find it odd that the two founder bonnie and clyde team are being replaced after all their so called brilliance and marketing and leading edge technology that they would just vanish with no explaination? I think something more sinister may be in the works. I guess all of us who lost thousands of dollars to these scam artist will just have to wait and see. We may never get our money back but I know a lot of satisfaction will be felt around the US by those that were stolen from by this out fit if Justice finally prevails. It would almost make the loss worth it to see the Zecevic's in stripes. I will continue to follow this pair of EXECUTIVES ( I use the term loosely) to whatever rock they climb under and make sure the general public is always aware of their latest move to avoid the accountability of their actions. We live in a great country here in the USA and even the socialist in Canada can't out run the long arm of the law for ever. So please to any potential investor in this orginazation or any of its subsidiaries please do all you homeowrk. Check with every state bureau of finanacial institution, every attorney general, every SEC division in the appropriate states. Trust me if you do your homework you will save yourself alot of money and a tremendous amount time trying to figure out whom you may have just done business with. There are several other solid companies in this industry that provide a proven record and lots of happy customers. Go find one of them before it is to late! Asta la Vista,
Pete
Phoenix,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, November 01, 2005
CASH NOW CORP (CHNW) 0.16 -0.08 (-33.33%) As of 10:10 AM EST on 11/01/2005 (Other OTC Delay: 15 mins.) Manage Alerts Notices & Terms Confirm all data with your broker before trading. Previous Close 0.24 on 10/10/05 Open 0.15 on N/A Volume 45,000 on Other OTC Day Low 0.15 as of 9:57 AM EST Day High 0.16 as of 10:10 AM EST If you are looking to put your retirement savings into a company, this is not where you should put your money. If you look at Enron stock, you will see the same future. Have a nice day Miro Z.
Pete
Phoenix,#4Consumer Comment
Fri, August 26, 2005
From the Arizona Group,
Just a note to tell you I spoke with Miro on the phone about a week ago. He first told me I was under investigation in the State of Arizona and that he could not talk to me. Then for the next 20 minutes I couldn't get him to shut up.
I asked that he accept our offer to settle by refunding our $44K that we sent to him for a Bank Charter, that we never even completed the application for, as well as the Cadillac (excuse me) Rolls Royce, Miro's correction, of software support and license agreements. He said he would never refund us our money.
If you have had similar experiences with Miro, I invite you to tell the world by responding to Ripoffreport.com. Miro said it was helping his business, and we all want him to do better because we need there to be something to attach a lien to.
This is the Miro Cash Now report for Friday August 26, 2005
Miro
Fort Lauderdale,#5REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, July 21, 2005
These "reports are erroneous" and misleading!
They are hurting innocent people with these misrepresentations.
Please see these 2 filed lawsuits which are self explanatory.
"Pete" and the Arizona group are dodging the process server, and continue to slander on various web sites while Toronto Star has defended and has stopped slandering and are now talking about settlement!
Please see http://www.cashnow.com/legal/ThorleyLawsuitFINAL.pdf
AND also:
https://cashnow.com/torontostar/index.pdf
These matters are self explanatory
Pete
Phoenix,#6Consumer Comment
Fri, April 08, 2005
February 22, 2005 07:41 PM US Eastern Timezone
California Department of Corporations, Federal and State Law Enforcement Agencies Launch Major Assault on Business Opportunity and Work-at-Home Scams
SACRAMENTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 22, 2005--In a massive criminal and civil crackdown on promoters of illegal business opportunity and work-at-home programs, the California Department of Corporations (Corporations), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and state law enforcement agencies from 13 other states have charged more than 109 operations with violating consumer protection laws and/or engaging in fraud. Business opportunity and work-at-home fraud, in particular, cause substantial consumer injury. In California's cases, Corporations took enforcement actions against franchises and business opportunities that illegally offered or sold business operations for payday advance loans, medical spas, mobile food kiosks, Internet kiosks, fitness centers, and restaurants.
"The perpetrators of these frauds were operating illegally and without the proper registration from Corporations to offer and sell franchises," said Corporations Commissioner William P. Wood. "By coordinating efforts with federal regulators and law enforcement, we can move aggressively to stop these scam operations which prey on unsuspecting consumers."
The enforcement sweep, known as Project Biz Opp Flop, highlights enforcement actions filed by a multitude of state enforcement agencies, including Corporations. The 14 states, including Maryland, Texas and Washington, announced 109 actions against franchise, business opportunity, and work-at-home promoters. The perpetrators are located in 22 states and Canada, with the greatest number of actions taken in California, Florida and Arizona. (See below listing of state actions.)
State Enforcement List for Calendar Year 2004 & Early 2005
California Department of Corporations
Arkansas
1. Home Business Systems and Sharon Henningsen, Civil action filed for restitution, AR parties, AR Attorney General (1/28/05).
California
2. Cash Now.com, LLC, Cash Now Plus.com, LLC, Miro Zecevic, C&D Order, PA and Ontario, Canada parties, Cal. Dept. Corp. (4/2/04).
3. Cash-Now USA.Com, Inc., Cash Now.com, LLC, Miro Zecevic, David G. McClenan, Gary McNulty, Victor Graham, C&D Order, PA and Ontario, Canada parties, Cal. Dept. Corp. (3/30/04).
Etc.........
Pete
Phoenix,#7Consumer Comment
Fri, April 08, 2005
February 22, 2005 07:41 PM US Eastern Timezone
California Department of Corporations, Federal and State Law Enforcement Agencies Launch Major Assault on Business Opportunity and Work-at-Home Scams
SACRAMENTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 22, 2005--In a massive criminal and civil crackdown on promoters of illegal business opportunity and work-at-home programs, the California Department of Corporations (Corporations), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and state law enforcement agencies from 13 other states have charged more than 109 operations with violating consumer protection laws and/or engaging in fraud. Business opportunity and work-at-home fraud, in particular, cause substantial consumer injury. In California's cases, Corporations took enforcement actions against franchises and business opportunities that illegally offered or sold business operations for payday advance loans, medical spas, mobile food kiosks, Internet kiosks, fitness centers, and restaurants.
"The perpetrators of these frauds were operating illegally and without the proper registration from Corporations to offer and sell franchises," said Corporations Commissioner William P. Wood. "By coordinating efforts with federal regulators and law enforcement, we can move aggressively to stop these scam operations which prey on unsuspecting consumers."
The enforcement sweep, known as Project Biz Opp Flop, highlights enforcement actions filed by a multitude of state enforcement agencies, including Corporations. The 14 states, including Maryland, Texas and Washington, announced 109 actions against franchise, business opportunity, and work-at-home promoters. The perpetrators are located in 22 states and Canada, with the greatest number of actions taken in California, Florida and Arizona. (See below listing of state actions.)
State Enforcement List for Calendar Year 2004 & Early 2005
California Department of Corporations
Arkansas
1. Home Business Systems and Sharon Henningsen, Civil action filed for restitution, AR parties, AR Attorney General (1/28/05).
California
2. Cash Now.com, LLC, Cash Now Plus.com, LLC, Miro Zecevic, C&D Order, PA and Ontario, Canada parties, Cal. Dept. Corp. (4/2/04).
3. Cash-Now USA.Com, Inc., Cash Now.com, LLC, Miro Zecevic, David G. McClenan, Gary McNulty, Victor Graham, C&D Order, PA and Ontario, Canada parties, Cal. Dept. Corp. (3/30/04).
Etc.........
Paul
Anaheim,#8Consumer Suggestion
Wed, March 16, 2005
According to your complaint, you sent $40k off and got Licensee and User Agreements and Bank Charters.
In other words, a handful of papers. Worthless papers, as it turns out.
And, let me see if I understand completely. You were looking for a better return than the stock market.
Well, are your papers able to be sold for more than you paid for them? If so, the investment was a good one. If not
I can't see many people doing this. I have to be honest here. It smacks of a get rich quick scheme. Knowledgeable investors look at those things and laugh as they turn the page.
Beginners and amateur investors are about the only people that buy into this nonsense. And, most of them usually get conned on a vending machine scam long before cash now ever gets to see them.
Still, I guess for every worthless business idea, there is a dreamer that will buy into it.
So, thanks for the warning!
Miro
Fort Lauderdale,#9REBUTTAL Owner of company
Wed, March 16, 2005
The e mails and responses were altered, and doctored by the people making this bogus complaint. The actual e mail exchanges and affidavits are filed in the Superior Court Ontario. Their motive was basically to steal the technology and the system and black mail us into refunding the fees paid by slandering us unless we gave in.
For example they identified companies that stopped offering franchises several years ago and inserted text like Dear Franchisee. Who wrote that? What year was that written? They purchased the software from a software company yet took a poke at the franchising company that no longer offers franchises. How does that work? Remember these are 4 accountants that advise clients on their businesses! In their defense and to be fair to all, the Internet Service Provider (Bell South) did go down during training for about 20 minutes and the new DELL laptops had to go through a virus scan before the software could load. I spent about 90 minutes trying to explain that running a virus scan is a normal computing experience!
That delay was simply unacceptable and this is why they felt the refund was in order! I was also put on notice that their tech team, who are master database builders assured them that viruses do not get into Arizona computers! Unless I was prepared to accept that fact then we should immediately issue a refund!!
Honestly we thought these guys spent a bit too much time out in the desert!
1) Their major concern was that the software was text based and did not have pretty pictures! We tried to explain that this is A BUSINESS TOOL AND NOT AOL!
2) Then they got all twisted out of shape because Florida changed the statue of the fees that can be charged. We gave them a link to the Florida State web site and what our RD indicates. The chubby one wanted to know how he could charge more! He was an accountant and expressed his concern that the Florida laws suck because they only allow a 650% APR rate!
3) The straw that broke the camels back was the fact that we refused to sell them leads for Arizona applicants only. They were offering a grand total of .50 cents per name! Now when we advised them that we are not in that business (selling leads by State) and that there are companies selling leads for $ 15.00 to $ 20.00 that's when they made peace with their God that maybe they are not fit to be accountants.
As the dinner and the evening wore on (yes had a hearty dinner at Shulas steak house) Only one of the best steak houses in North America (and after the chubby one knocked off an 18 oz NY Strip) he noticed a piece of poo on his steak(I'm not making any of this up so help me God!) I assured him that, this reputable steak house does not serve poo with their steak! I picked up the bill to avoid having to sit through the nonsense of listening to them trying to explain to the head waiter that they found.
It is sad that these creatures spread false rumors about good hard working businesses. They are not accountants by any stretch of the imagination. I classify them as petty con artists or fools at best.
Perhaps a fool and his money do quickly part ways!
As our corporate literature clearly states some people should not go into business and these 4 definitively fit the bill! We called their bluff and offered to buy them any software they choose (from any of our competitors).They refused! We offered to re train them. They refused! When we challenged them to sue us so that a court could decide if ewe did anything wrong. They refused and resorted to slander and disinformation on this web site!
Miro Zecevic
Pete
Phoenix,#10Consumer Comment
Tue, February 22, 2005
This is an e-mail that I received from The Canadian Association of Community Financial Service Providers when I asked them for information about Cash Now.com.
Their Response:
Mr.__________:
The company CASHNOW is under suspension from this association, The Canadian Association of Community Financial Service Providers because of unanswered questions on their business.
For complaints re.companies that involve an international link you should contact the Canadian Federal government agency known as The Competion Bureau.The website is
www.competition.ic.gc.ca Their email address is
[email protected]
Yours truly
Liz Collinson
CACFS Customer Service Representative
Pete
Phoenix,#11Consumer Comment
Wed, February 16, 2005
Jul. 3, 2004. 01:00 AM
Payback sought from payday firm
U.S. franchisees pursue Markham loan company
Cash Now has also tangled with regulators in four states
NICOLE MACINTYRE AND JIM RANKIN
STAFF REPORTERS
Less than a year ago, Cash Now ranked 10th on Profit magazine's hot 50 list of Canadian businesses to look out for. The Markham-based company sells payday lending franchises over the Internet. Sales, according to the magazine, had jumped from $165,000 in 2000, to $2 million in 2002.
"The Gold Rush is On," declares the company Web site. "If you missed the Real Estate Boom of the '80s, the Recycling Boom of the mid '90s, the Internet Boom of the late '90s ... DO NOT let this opportunity pass you by!"
Miro Zecevic, CEO of Cash Now, is eager to sit down for an interview. He picks a time and place. The day before the interview is to take place, he cancels.
"I'm just a small guy trying to run a business," Zecevic says over the phone. "We develop software. We've got this fabulous technology, we are on the threshold of going public. This can really derail everything ... I work too d**n hard, I put my heart and soul and my life, I mortgaged my soul, everything to do this. ... It's not worth it."
Zecevic is the man behind a labyrinth of Internet ventures, the most prominent of which is Cash Now, a Markham-based company that offers payday loan franchises, including software and territorial rights, for sale online. The payday lending business is a controversial and unregulated industry that charges heavy interest and fees on short-term loans.
Cash Now has run afoul of U.S. regulators in at least four states for selling unregistered franchises, and more than a dozen American investors feel they didn't get what they paid for.
In California, Cash Now USA collected money from at least five entrepreneurs before officials stepped in and ordered the company to stop. Virginia Jo Dunlap of the California Department of Corporations says Cash Now USA didn't disclose to its purchasers that it had been issued similar "stop" orders in other states, including Washington, Wisconsin and Illinois.
After changing his mind about a face-to-face interview, Zecevic agreed to accept a set of questions from the Star by e-mail. He didn't answer many of them, and instead directed the Star to public documents and company information posted on Cash Now's Web site.
"At Cash Now we strive to answer our clients' needs and to assist them through their temporary financial difficulties," Zecevic wrote in a reply e-mail.
Zecevic said the problems the company had in Illinois and Wisconsin had been cleared up, and directed the Star to a news release announcing the dismissal of Cash Now staff at its Philadelphia offices. The lengthy release says the office's top managers were fired because they attempted to usurp Cash Now's franchisees by starting their own payday lending company. Cash Now headquarters has filed a lawsuit against one of the Philadelphia staff.
"There are no 'difficult times' ahead for us. There is no hardship. To us this is just 'another day at the office,'" reads the release, which goes on to tell franchisees that Cash Now will not hold them back if they want to jump ship.
"We believe in the old saying, if you love something, you set it free. The only difference in this relationship is that if it does comes (sic) back, we don't want it!"
A number of the American franchisees say they were never given a list of franchisees or a Uniform Franchise Offering Circular, a prospectus required by law. Franchisees also say there was a lack of support, inferior technology, inaccurate earnings projections and inadequate training.
Uday Roy is still waiting for his money back. He paid $29,500 (U.S.) for a Cash Now Plus franchise last fall after reading about the business online. Roy, 31, says he was told he would be the first franchisee in California. He later learned there were others and they were unhappy. That was enough for Roy. He wanted out.
In an e-mail to the company, Roy, stating his concern over the illegal offering, requested his signed contract be returned, along with his money.
"We are not returning any signed contracts. You told us why you cancelled and it has no merits," Zecevic wrote in one e-mail forwarded to the Star. When Roy wrote back demanding a full refund, Zecevic responded with a single line: "Get Real!"
Fearing he wouldn't get a cent back, Roy says he brokered a deal, telling Zecevic he wanted to change to a Cash Now Express franchise, which would allow him to offer payday loans over the Internet, without a storefront. The online franchise is cheaper at $19,500 U.S. Zecevic agreed and refunded Roy $10,000.
Roy hasn't opened up his online shop, and doesn't intend to. He says he wants nothing to do with Cash Now, and is still trying to get all his money back. When asked to comment on the complaints of the California franchisees, Zecevic did not respond.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'I just assumed they were legitimate if they were offering a system for $20,000-plus.'
Randy Wright, franchisee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
His story is repeated in Illinois, where a franchisee is suing, demanding a refund after Cash Now was fined $1,500 U.S. by the state for selling a franchise illegally. The queue of disgruntled Cash Now franchises stretches across the United States.
Randy Wright started out a happy customer. So much so, he gave a videotaped testimonial, extolling the benefits of being a franchisee. If you click deep enough into Cash Now's Web site, it's still posted as a marketing tool. Wright says he and Zecevic don't speak any more though, except for "very malicious e-mails."
Wright first bought the rights for Cash Now in Maryland. After setting up shop, he discovered payday loans are illegal in Maryland, a technicality he hadn't bothered to check because he presumed Cash Now knew the rules. "My own stupidity, I went on their word. I was told that they were an up-and-coming big company and obviously, I just assumed they were legitimate if they were offering a system for $20,000-plus."
Changing his Maryland business to an online operation, Wright then bought the rights to Cash Now in parts of Washington, D.C., and Virginia, where he could sell loans face to face. Soon after the $60,000 U.S. investment, he sued Cash Now for selling franchises within his territory. The case was settled outside court.
Roger Sawatzky bought a Cash Now franchise for $19,600 U.S. in January, 2003. He says the company told him it would take care of any licences he needed to sell payday loans in Wisconsin. Nearly 60 loans later, Sawatzky says he discovered he was operating illegally as neither he, nor Cash Now, had gotten a licence. The state sanctioned Cash Now for illegally selling a franchise. Sawatzky eventually got a licence and reopened his business. He says he contacted a lawyer who told him it would cost more to go after Zecevic in Canada then he could ever recover.
In Colorado, Bob and Sue Knight united with three other Cash Now franchisees to file a letter of complaint to the office of the state attorney-general after they each invested between $19,500 and $29,500 U.S.
The Knights bought their Cash Now franchise after Bob retired from the police department in Grand Junction. They were open for less than a week when they realized they were breaking the law by operating without a licence. When they submitted Cash Now's contracts for approval by the state, they say they were rejected.In their nine-page complaint letter, which the attorney-general's office has forwarded to the Federal Trade Commission, the Knights and others say they were forced to hand over a non-refundable deposit before they could see disclosure documents.
"Everything they've got," says Bob Knight, "is just smoke and mirrors and a sham."
Cash Now's headquarters is the second floor of the Data Mirror Technology Tower on Steeles Ave. E. It's unclear how many franchises Cash Now has sold in Canada and elsewhere. Zecevic wouldn't answer that question.
According to an undated story posted to http://www.iefranchise.com, there are 100 "international and domestic" Cash Now franchises. A search of Canadian phone listings spits back about 20 Cash Now stores sprinkled across the country, including several in the GTA.
A Web domain registration search shows the iefranchise.com Web site shares the mailing address of Cash Now. The story with the hundred figure is about Zecevic's wife, and her success as chief operating officer of Cash Now.
Roxanne Cashluba is one of the Canadian franchisees. She bought into Cash Now nearly three years ago, and says her Hamilton store is making money, and that the business pulled her out of serious debt she had racked up on two failed business ventures. For that, she is grateful.
But she knows of others who weren't so fortunate. She pays Cash Now $300 in royalties each month, and has little communication with headquarters.
"Cash Now, the head office, is very inexperienced," said Cashluba. She is aware of the problems in the U.S., and says other Canadian investors have had problems as well.
In an e-mail, Zecevic reminded the Star:
"Our good reputation is paramount to the success of our business. Therefore, any misleading or inaccurate statements made about any of the Cash Now principals or the Cash Now group of companies will have a significant detrimental and damaging effect on our business."
When he made the top 10 list in 2002, he was asked for his "best advice."
Zecevic was brief: "Take risks and let things flow."
Reprint of the article can be found at
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1088806210024&call_pageid=1087552987718&col=1087552987710
Pete
Phoenix,#12Consumer Comment
Wed, February 16, 2005
Jul. 3, 2004. 01:00 AM
Payback sought from payday firm
U.S. franchisees pursue Markham loan company
Cash Now has also tangled with regulators in four states
NICOLE MACINTYRE AND JIM RANKIN
STAFF REPORTERS
Less than a year ago, Cash Now ranked 10th on Profit magazine's hot 50 list of Canadian businesses to look out for. The Markham-based company sells payday lending franchises over the Internet. Sales, according to the magazine, had jumped from $165,000 in 2000, to $2 million in 2002.
"The Gold Rush is On," declares the company Web site. "If you missed the Real Estate Boom of the '80s, the Recycling Boom of the mid '90s, the Internet Boom of the late '90s ... DO NOT let this opportunity pass you by!"
Miro Zecevic, CEO of Cash Now, is eager to sit down for an interview. He picks a time and place. The day before the interview is to take place, he cancels.
"I'm just a small guy trying to run a business," Zecevic says over the phone. "We develop software. We've got this fabulous technology, we are on the threshold of going public. This can really derail everything ... I work too d**n hard, I put my heart and soul and my life, I mortgaged my soul, everything to do this. ... It's not worth it."
Zecevic is the man behind a labyrinth of Internet ventures, the most prominent of which is Cash Now, a Markham-based company that offers payday loan franchises, including software and territorial rights, for sale online. The payday lending business is a controversial and unregulated industry that charges heavy interest and fees on short-term loans.
Cash Now has run afoul of U.S. regulators in at least four states for selling unregistered franchises, and more than a dozen American investors feel they didn't get what they paid for.
In California, Cash Now USA collected money from at least five entrepreneurs before officials stepped in and ordered the company to stop. Virginia Jo Dunlap of the California Department of Corporations says Cash Now USA didn't disclose to its purchasers that it had been issued similar "stop" orders in other states, including Washington, Wisconsin and Illinois.
After changing his mind about a face-to-face interview, Zecevic agreed to accept a set of questions from the Star by e-mail. He didn't answer many of them, and instead directed the Star to public documents and company information posted on Cash Now's Web site.
"At Cash Now we strive to answer our clients' needs and to assist them through their temporary financial difficulties," Zecevic wrote in a reply e-mail.
Zecevic said the problems the company had in Illinois and Wisconsin had been cleared up, and directed the Star to a news release announcing the dismissal of Cash Now staff at its Philadelphia offices. The lengthy release says the office's top managers were fired because they attempted to usurp Cash Now's franchisees by starting their own payday lending company. Cash Now headquarters has filed a lawsuit against one of the Philadelphia staff.
"There are no 'difficult times' ahead for us. There is no hardship. To us this is just 'another day at the office,'" reads the release, which goes on to tell franchisees that Cash Now will not hold them back if they want to jump ship.
"We believe in the old saying, if you love something, you set it free. The only difference in this relationship is that if it does comes (sic) back, we don't want it!"
A number of the American franchisees say they were never given a list of franchisees or a Uniform Franchise Offering Circular, a prospectus required by law. Franchisees also say there was a lack of support, inferior technology, inaccurate earnings projections and inadequate training.
Uday Roy is still waiting for his money back. He paid $29,500 (U.S.) for a Cash Now Plus franchise last fall after reading about the business online. Roy, 31, says he was told he would be the first franchisee in California. He later learned there were others and they were unhappy. That was enough for Roy. He wanted out.
In an e-mail to the company, Roy, stating his concern over the illegal offering, requested his signed contract be returned, along with his money.
"We are not returning any signed contracts. You told us why you cancelled and it has no merits," Zecevic wrote in one e-mail forwarded to the Star. When Roy wrote back demanding a full refund, Zecevic responded with a single line: "Get Real!"
Fearing he wouldn't get a cent back, Roy says he brokered a deal, telling Zecevic he wanted to change to a Cash Now Express franchise, which would allow him to offer payday loans over the Internet, without a storefront. The online franchise is cheaper at $19,500 U.S. Zecevic agreed and refunded Roy $10,000.
Roy hasn't opened up his online shop, and doesn't intend to. He says he wants nothing to do with Cash Now, and is still trying to get all his money back. When asked to comment on the complaints of the California franchisees, Zecevic did not respond.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'I just assumed they were legitimate if they were offering a system for $20,000-plus.'
Randy Wright, franchisee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
His story is repeated in Illinois, where a franchisee is suing, demanding a refund after Cash Now was fined $1,500 U.S. by the state for selling a franchise illegally. The queue of disgruntled Cash Now franchises stretches across the United States.
Randy Wright started out a happy customer. So much so, he gave a videotaped testimonial, extolling the benefits of being a franchisee. If you click deep enough into Cash Now's Web site, it's still posted as a marketing tool. Wright says he and Zecevic don't speak any more though, except for "very malicious e-mails."
Wright first bought the rights for Cash Now in Maryland. After setting up shop, he discovered payday loans are illegal in Maryland, a technicality he hadn't bothered to check because he presumed Cash Now knew the rules. "My own stupidity, I went on their word. I was told that they were an up-and-coming big company and obviously, I just assumed they were legitimate if they were offering a system for $20,000-plus."
Changing his Maryland business to an online operation, Wright then bought the rights to Cash Now in parts of Washington, D.C., and Virginia, where he could sell loans face to face. Soon after the $60,000 U.S. investment, he sued Cash Now for selling franchises within his territory. The case was settled outside court.
Roger Sawatzky bought a Cash Now franchise for $19,600 U.S. in January, 2003. He says the company told him it would take care of any licences he needed to sell payday loans in Wisconsin. Nearly 60 loans later, Sawatzky says he discovered he was operating illegally as neither he, nor Cash Now, had gotten a licence. The state sanctioned Cash Now for illegally selling a franchise. Sawatzky eventually got a licence and reopened his business. He says he contacted a lawyer who told him it would cost more to go after Zecevic in Canada then he could ever recover.
In Colorado, Bob and Sue Knight united with three other Cash Now franchisees to file a letter of complaint to the office of the state attorney-general after they each invested between $19,500 and $29,500 U.S.
The Knights bought their Cash Now franchise after Bob retired from the police department in Grand Junction. They were open for less than a week when they realized they were breaking the law by operating without a licence. When they submitted Cash Now's contracts for approval by the state, they say they were rejected.In their nine-page complaint letter, which the attorney-general's office has forwarded to the Federal Trade Commission, the Knights and others say they were forced to hand over a non-refundable deposit before they could see disclosure documents.
"Everything they've got," says Bob Knight, "is just smoke and mirrors and a sham."
Cash Now's headquarters is the second floor of the Data Mirror Technology Tower on Steeles Ave. E. It's unclear how many franchises Cash Now has sold in Canada and elsewhere. Zecevic wouldn't answer that question.
According to an undated story posted to http://www.iefranchise.com, there are 100 "international and domestic" Cash Now franchises. A search of Canadian phone listings spits back about 20 Cash Now stores sprinkled across the country, including several in the GTA.
A Web domain registration search shows the iefranchise.com Web site shares the mailing address of Cash Now. The story with the hundred figure is about Zecevic's wife, and her success as chief operating officer of Cash Now.
Roxanne Cashluba is one of the Canadian franchisees. She bought into Cash Now nearly three years ago, and says her Hamilton store is making money, and that the business pulled her out of serious debt she had racked up on two failed business ventures. For that, she is grateful.
But she knows of others who weren't so fortunate. She pays Cash Now $300 in royalties each month, and has little communication with headquarters.
"Cash Now, the head office, is very inexperienced," said Cashluba. She is aware of the problems in the U.S., and says other Canadian investors have had problems as well.
In an e-mail, Zecevic reminded the Star:
"Our good reputation is paramount to the success of our business. Therefore, any misleading or inaccurate statements made about any of the Cash Now principals or the Cash Now group of companies will have a significant detrimental and damaging effect on our business."
When he made the top 10 list in 2002, he was asked for his "best advice."
Zecevic was brief: "Take risks and let things flow."
Reprint of the article can be found at
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1088806210024&call_pageid=1087552987718&col=1087552987710