;
  • Report:  #2152

Complaint Review: ROBERT CLEMENTS - ALVIN Texas

Reported By:
- COPPERAS COVE, tx,
Submitted:
Wed, April 26, 2000
Updated:
Tue, May 02, 2000

ROBERT CLEMENTS
ATTORNEY AT LAW ALVIN, Texas, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Lawyers

WE ENTERED INTO A WRITTEN CONTRACT WITH AN ATTORNEY WHO STATED

HE COULD GET A DIVORCE AND MORE THAN LIKELY CUSTODY OF A MINOR

CHILD FOR $15,000.00 AT MOST. BY THE TIME WE HAD FINISHED THE

ATTORNEY HAD POSTPONED EVERY ENTRY ON THE COURT DOCKETS THAT WERE

SCHEDULED, HE HAD GIVEN THE SOON TO BE EX EVERYTHING ASKED FOR AND MUCH MORE.

HE HAD AGREED TO THE SIGNING OF A NOTE ON OUR BEHALF FOR OVER 10,000.00 AT A BANK THE MOTHER IN LAW WORKED AT AND HAD GIVEN WITHOUT A SPOUSES SIGNATURE. SHE WAS INFORMED EITHER SHE GOT THE SIGNATURE OR SHE WAS RESPONSIBLE, EVEN THOUGH THE MONEY WENT TO THE OTHER SPOUSE, THE ATTORNEY AGREED TO THE REPAYMENT BY THE INNOCENT SPOUSE.

HE APPARENTLY HAD MADE DEROGETORY STATEMENTS TO THE PRESIDEING JUDGE DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE JUDGE REFERRED TO HIS CLINENT AS A DEADBEAT, EVEN THOUGH ALL CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS WERE MADE AS WELL AS SPOUSAL SUPPORT AND HEALTH INSURANCE WAS KEPT IN EFFECT. THE OPPOSING SPOUSE ALSO TRICKED THE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY INTO BILLING THE INNOCENT SPOUSE FOR THE AUTO INSURANCE.

THE ATTORNEY BEING AWARE OF ALL THESE FACTS AFTER COLLECTING OVER $28,000.00 FOR THE DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS CHOSE TO WITHDRAW FROM THE CASE STATING HE FELT HIS CLIENT HAD LOST FAITH IN HIM AND THEREBY CAUSING ANOTHER ATTORNEY TO BE FOUND. THE NEW ATTORNEY WENT TO COURT WITH THE INNOCENT SPOUSE UNDER THE CHARGES THAT THIS SPOUSE WAS DELIQUENT IN CHILD SUPPORT.

PROOF WAS BROUGHT TO COURT THAT IT HAD BEEN PAID AND THAT NOTHING WAS DUE. THE BRAZORIA COUNTY JUDGE ALSO REFLECTING HIS CONTEMPT FOR THE ONE PARTY READ THROUGH ANTOHER CASE WILL TRIAL WAS GOING ON AND THEN TOLD THE PARTY TO PAY SOME FIGURE HE HAD PULLED FROM THE AIR PLUS ALL COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES. EVEN THE OPPOSING ATTORNEY COULD HARDLY BELEIVE THE DECISSION.

FEEL ROBERT CLEMENTS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REFUND SOME OR ALL

OF MY MONEY AND CORRECTION SHOULD BE MADE TO WRONGFUL OR INCOMPLETE DECISSIONS MADE IN THIS DIVORCE. HE CAUSED THE COURTS

TO RESCHEDULE TIME AFTER TIME, DELAYING ACTION, REQUIRING ADDITIONAL FUNDS AND TAKING NO REAL ACTION IN THIS DIVORCE CASE.



Featured Reports
Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!