Complaint Review: Lynda Sue Steele And Andrew J. Alvitre - Fayetteville North Carolina

Lynda Steele was sentenced on February 11, 2011 to 41 months in Federal Prison.   She is incarcerated at USP Hazelton Federal Penitentiary until April 11, 2014!  She was indicted for Wire Fraud.

Her victims now can sleep peacefully and know that she is not free to do this again!

Lynda Steele is finally going to be in prison.  Sentencing is set for December 6, 2010 in New Bern before the Federal Court.  She will be taken in to custody, pray for a long sentence.  

Its sad for her children,who she did not think about when committing this crime.  Shame on her.

Lynda Steele plead guilty yesterday 09/14/2010 to two felonies, wire fraud and money laundering!   She will go to sentencing within 90 days and will be taken to PRISON at that time.  She faces up to 20 years for what she did to her victims.

Here is the release from the US Attorneys Office yesterday:

U. S. Department of Justice
George E. B. Holding
United States Attorney
Eastern District of North Carolina
NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
TUESDAY - September 14, 2010
WOMAN PLEADS GUILTY TO CUMBERLAND COUNTY
REAL ESTATE SCHEME
GREENVILLE - United States Attorney George E.B. Holding
announced that in federal court today LYNDA S. STEELE, 37, pled
guilty before United States Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel to
wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section
1343.
A Criminal Information was filed on July 29, 2010.
According to the investigation, STEELE, doing business as JP
& Associates Investment Firm, represented herself as someone who
purchased properties for investment, fixed them up, and flipped
them for a profit. In portraying even basic facts about herself to
investors, STEELE often made misrepresentations, claiming that she
was a licensed CPA when she had not graduated from college, that
she was widowed because her husband died in the Army when she was
actually divorced, and that she owned Family Firsta Mortgage
Brokerage owned and operated by others. STEELE represented to her
investors that she would use their funds to purchase real estate in
their names that could be held and then later resold at a profit.
In reality, STEELE did not purchase the real estate, rather she frequently spent the money on other purchases such as renovation of
her office space, payroll for a company owned by her boyfriend, and
payment to past investors.
The maximum penalty for the wire fraud charge is up to 20
years imprisonment followed by up to three years supervised
release and a fine of up to $250,000.
Investigation of this case was conducted by the Internal
Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division and the
Fayetteville Police Department. Assistant United States Attorney
David Bragdon represented the government.

You can see more at www.usdoj.gov/usao/nce

Here is the article in today's Fayetteville Observer:

Woman pleads guilty in loan scam

Lynda S. Steele will finally face criminal charges and end up in Federal Prison for up to 30 years.  Karma really does exist  See the story from the Fayetteville Observer on August 3, 2010.

Lynda Steele is at it again.   She is now trying to keep doing the same shady real estate deals as before.  She should already be in jail.  Her new adventures will place her there.  Lynda come on now, or is it Katie Kat?:)  Do you really think all the people you owe money to are just going to go away?  Keep dreaming. 

When Lynda Steele is in jail on federal charges . And hopefully that will be soon

When Lynda Steele is in jail on federal charges . And hopefully that will be soon

When Lynda Steele is in jail on federal charges . And hopefully that will be soon

When Lynda Steele is in jail on federal charges . And hopefully that will be soon

I read all the complaints/rebuttals/b****slaps on this thread. I have also been a member of this board for some time. I want to clarify a few points. 1. The intial post is what this board is here for; complaints about unsavory dealings with businesses in the area so potential consumers can make a fair judgment about who they want to do business with. It is NOT for the following: a.) Discussions about personal lives. b.) Discussions about personal wealth. No one cares (especially during a recession) that your a millionaire. It doesn't make you a good or bad person, it just means your bank account is fatter than some, and thinner than others. c.) immature discussions, which I'm going to get to now. 2. Under each intial post is a series of boxes. One says victim, one says rebuttal and one is for the employer or business owner to respond. Andrew posted as an individual. This was not the correct box if he owned the business, which it appears he did. Andrew, instead of delving into details about your life, business, how nice a guy you are, etc, you could have just said the following: We appreciate consumer advocacy groups to mediate discourse between us and our clients. We stride to provide our customers with top notch customer service and solutions to their business needs. You could put the lawsuit out there and just say you look forward to a favorable resolution to pending matters and not devulge your entire life history. FUTHERMORE on 12/20/2008 Andrew wrote: I don't care that counsel has advised me not to respond here. The fact is that I have nothing to hide and have no problem addressing anything about my professional life. Whether you have anything to hide or not is irrelevant. I doubt with being the owner of a million dollar company that you pay for anything less than a stellar attorney who graduated from one of the fine law schools in this state, therefore you need to listen to them. In a post dated 2/20/2009 you stated: Unfortunately I have suffered substantial damages (personally and professionally of both monetary and non-monetary capacity) and may or may not confer with counsel to recover said damages of both a professional and personal nature in light of malicious actions brought forth against me by certain specific parties. Additionally, 'opportunity lost' has been realized by many families, friends and homeowners that I call friends of whom I would have aided with intelligent and expert (the intelligent and expert excerpts stated to me by others I will add) counsel had this disruption and/or the malicious actions taken against me not transpired. From a selfless perspective, they are bigger losers than I am as a result of this matter. In addition on 2/21/2009 I am disappointed in the current circumstances that the plaintiffs and main defendant are in. I am especially disappointed in the circumstances that the wrongfully alleged defendants (FFMC/Self) are in as well. This is probably the reason why your attorney told you NOT to engage or respond to anything in this thread. As a potential home buyer within the next few years, I see the back and forth that you willing engaged in on this board. Many use this when it comes down to evaluating someone to do business with. A home is not a small purchase, and many would like to do business with someone who is reliable, non-abrasive and easy to get along with. I think you damaged your reputation more than any of the other posters on this thread because of your words, not theirs. Clearly you didn't follow your legal counsels advice, and by engaging in conversations that they told you not to do, you potentially damaged your own reputation with those that also have the a say in the overall success of your business: future customers doing their due diligence to check you out before signing on the dotted line. (This of course is after legal discourse is completed) I sincerely wish you the best in your future endevors and hope your legal issues get resolved in a way all parties can be happy with. As for the immaturity, I will be sending an email to the moderators to closely watch this thread, as it appears the tit-for-tat is getting out of hand.

I read all the complaints/rebuttals/b****slaps on this thread. I have also been a member of this board for some time. I want to clarify a few points. 1. The intial post is what this board is here for; complaints about unsavory dealings with businesses in the area so potential consumers can make a fair judgment about who they want to do business with. It is NOT for the following: a.) Discussions about personal lives. b.) Discussions about personal wealth. No one cares (especially during a recession) that your a millionaire. It doesn't make you a good or bad person, it just means your bank account is fatter than some, and thinner than others. c.) immature discussions, which I'm going to get to now. 2. Under each intial post is a series of boxes. One says victim, one says rebuttal and one is for the employer or business owner to respond. Andrew posted as an individual. This was not the correct box if he owned the business, which it appears he did. Andrew, instead of delving into details about your life, business, how nice a guy you are, etc, you could have just said the following: We appreciate consumer advocacy groups to mediate discourse between us and our clients. We stride to provide our customers with top notch customer service and solutions to their business needs. You could put the lawsuit out there and just say you look forward to a favorable resolution to pending matters and not devulge your entire life history. FUTHERMORE on 12/20/2008 Andrew wrote: I don't care that counsel has advised me not to respond here. The fact is that I have nothing to hide and have no problem addressing anything about my professional life. Whether you have anything to hide or not is irrelevant. I doubt with being the owner of a million dollar company that you pay for anything less than a stellar attorney who graduated from one of the fine law schools in this state, therefore you need to listen to them. In a post dated 2/20/2009 you stated: Unfortunately I have suffered substantial damages (personally and professionally of both monetary and non-monetary capacity) and may or may not confer with counsel to recover said damages of both a professional and personal nature in light of malicious actions brought forth against me by certain specific parties. Additionally, 'opportunity lost' has been realized by many families, friends and homeowners that I call friends of whom I would have aided with intelligent and expert (the intelligent and expert excerpts stated to me by others I will add) counsel had this disruption and/or the malicious actions taken against me not transpired. From a selfless perspective, they are bigger losers than I am as a result of this matter. In addition on 2/21/2009 I am disappointed in the current circumstances that the plaintiffs and main defendant are in. I am especially disappointed in the circumstances that the wrongfully alleged defendants (FFMC/Self) are in as well. This is probably the reason why your attorney told you NOT to engage or respond to anything in this thread. As a potential home buyer within the next few years, I see the back and forth that you willing engaged in on this board. Many use this when it comes down to evaluating someone to do business with. A home is not a small purchase, and many would like to do business with someone who is reliable, non-abrasive and easy to get along with. I think you damaged your reputation more than any of the other posters on this thread because of your words, not theirs. Clearly you didn't follow your legal counsels advice, and by engaging in conversations that they told you not to do, you potentially damaged your own reputation with those that also have the a say in the overall success of your business: future customers doing their due diligence to check you out before signing on the dotted line. (This of course is after legal discourse is completed) I sincerely wish you the best in your future endevors and hope your legal issues get resolved in a way all parties can be happy with. As for the immaturity, I will be sending an email to the moderators to closely watch this thread, as it appears the tit-for-tat is getting out of hand.

I read all the complaints/rebuttals/b****slaps on this thread. I have also been a member of this board for some time. I want to clarify a few points. 1. The intial post is what this board is here for; complaints about unsavory dealings with businesses in the area so potential consumers can make a fair judgment about who they want to do business with. It is NOT for the following: a.) Discussions about personal lives. b.) Discussions about personal wealth. No one cares (especially during a recession) that your a millionaire. It doesn't make you a good or bad person, it just means your bank account is fatter than some, and thinner than others. c.) immature discussions, which I'm going to get to now. 2. Under each intial post is a series of boxes. One says victim, one says rebuttal and one is for the employer or business owner to respond. Andrew posted as an individual. This was not the correct box if he owned the business, which it appears he did. Andrew, instead of delving into details about your life, business, how nice a guy you are, etc, you could have just said the following: We appreciate consumer advocacy groups to mediate discourse between us and our clients. We stride to provide our customers with top notch customer service and solutions to their business needs. You could put the lawsuit out there and just say you look forward to a favorable resolution to pending matters and not devulge your entire life history. FUTHERMORE on 12/20/2008 Andrew wrote: I don't care that counsel has advised me not to respond here. The fact is that I have nothing to hide and have no problem addressing anything about my professional life. Whether you have anything to hide or not is irrelevant. I doubt with being the owner of a million dollar company that you pay for anything less than a stellar attorney who graduated from one of the fine law schools in this state, therefore you need to listen to them. In a post dated 2/20/2009 you stated: Unfortunately I have suffered substantial damages (personally and professionally of both monetary and non-monetary capacity) and may or may not confer with counsel to recover said damages of both a professional and personal nature in light of malicious actions brought forth against me by certain specific parties. Additionally, 'opportunity lost' has been realized by many families, friends and homeowners that I call friends of whom I would have aided with intelligent and expert (the intelligent and expert excerpts stated to me by others I will add) counsel had this disruption and/or the malicious actions taken against me not transpired. From a selfless perspective, they are bigger losers than I am as a result of this matter. In addition on 2/21/2009 I am disappointed in the current circumstances that the plaintiffs and main defendant are in. I am especially disappointed in the circumstances that the wrongfully alleged defendants (FFMC/Self) are in as well. This is probably the reason why your attorney told you NOT to engage or respond to anything in this thread. As a potential home buyer within the next few years, I see the back and forth that you willing engaged in on this board. Many use this when it comes down to evaluating someone to do business with. A home is not a small purchase, and many would like to do business with someone who is reliable, non-abrasive and easy to get along with. I think you damaged your reputation more than any of the other posters on this thread because of your words, not theirs. Clearly you didn't follow your legal counsels advice, and by engaging in conversations that they told you not to do, you potentially damaged your own reputation with those that also have the a say in the overall success of your business: future customers doing their due diligence to check you out before signing on the dotted line. (This of course is after legal discourse is completed) I sincerely wish you the best in your future endevors and hope your legal issues get resolved in a way all parties can be happy with. As for the immaturity, I will be sending an email to the moderators to closely watch this thread, as it appears the tit-for-tat is getting out of hand.

I read all the complaints/rebuttals/b****slaps on this thread. I have also been a member of this board for some time. I want to clarify a few points. 1. The intial post is what this board is here for; complaints about unsavory dealings with businesses in the area so potential consumers can make a fair judgment about who they want to do business with. It is NOT for the following: a.) Discussions about personal lives. b.) Discussions about personal wealth. No one cares (especially during a recession) that your a millionaire. It doesn't make you a good or bad person, it just means your bank account is fatter than some, and thinner than others. c.) immature discussions, which I'm going to get to now. 2. Under each intial post is a series of boxes. One says victim, one says rebuttal and one is for the employer or business owner to respond. Andrew posted as an individual. This was not the correct box if he owned the business, which it appears he did. Andrew, instead of delving into details about your life, business, how nice a guy you are, etc, you could have just said the following: We appreciate consumer advocacy groups to mediate discourse between us and our clients. We stride to provide our customers with top notch customer service and solutions to their business needs. You could put the lawsuit out there and just say you look forward to a favorable resolution to pending matters and not devulge your entire life history. FUTHERMORE on 12/20/2008 Andrew wrote: I don't care that counsel has advised me not to respond here. The fact is that I have nothing to hide and have no problem addressing anything about my professional life. Whether you have anything to hide or not is irrelevant. I doubt with being the owner of a million dollar company that you pay for anything less than a stellar attorney who graduated from one of the fine law schools in this state, therefore you need to listen to them. In a post dated 2/20/2009 you stated: Unfortunately I have suffered substantial damages (personally and professionally of both monetary and non-monetary capacity) and may or may not confer with counsel to recover said damages of both a professional and personal nature in light of malicious actions brought forth against me by certain specific parties. Additionally, 'opportunity lost' has been realized by many families, friends and homeowners that I call friends of whom I would have aided with intelligent and expert (the intelligent and expert excerpts stated to me by others I will add) counsel had this disruption and/or the malicious actions taken against me not transpired. From a selfless perspective, they are bigger losers than I am as a result of this matter. In addition on 2/21/2009 I am disappointed in the current circumstances that the plaintiffs and main defendant are in. I am especially disappointed in the circumstances that the wrongfully alleged defendants (FFMC/Self) are in as well. This is probably the reason why your attorney told you NOT to engage or respond to anything in this thread. As a potential home buyer within the next few years, I see the back and forth that you willing engaged in on this board. Many use this when it comes down to evaluating someone to do business with. A home is not a small purchase, and many would like to do business with someone who is reliable, non-abrasive and easy to get along with. I think you damaged your reputation more than any of the other posters on this thread because of your words, not theirs. Clearly you didn't follow your legal counsels advice, and by engaging in conversations that they told you not to do, you potentially damaged your own reputation with those that also have the a say in the overall success of your business: future customers doing their due diligence to check you out before signing on the dotted line. (This of course is after legal discourse is completed) I sincerely wish you the best in your future endevors and hope your legal issues get resolved in a way all parties can be happy with. As for the immaturity, I will be sending an email to the moderators to closely watch this thread, as it appears the tit-for-tat is getting out of hand.

Something new is happening and as soon as it can be posted it will be!!

Something new is happening and as soon as it can be posted it will be!!

Tomorrow will be a front page story on the judgment against these scum bag people! Also keep looking in the next few days for another front page story on this case! Next will be criminal charges!!

This site is a legitimate website that is regulated and licensed . Whereas the Alvitre and Steele fiasco is a load of lying bull**** The public needs to know the outcome of everything Ms Steele has done. When she goes to jail for her crimes then the posting here will stop. And from what I know that will be soon! And as for being a plaintiff sorry but no I am not. Hope everything comes out for you and you don't end up with constipation LOL Lynda remember toliets are public in jail:)

For pete sake you're on ripoff report. Was spell check important. did my point get across to you? to some who doesnt know this site it can be create by donald duck or circus monkey such as yourself. last thing anyone cares about is my spelling. Here are the types of individuals reading about Lynda steele or andrew alvitre. their past customers, friends (who I can attest pays no mind to your barking) or internet surfers. Any one person getting all hot and bothered over the matter is a sensitive being. I can create anything about you Star (who will never mention his real name, but is the plaintiff) about whatever and whenever on ANY SPAM site. When I get bored or happen to be on the crapper the site is opened to where my morning laughs begins. If you haven't notice what good public information can you use besides DONT invest with Lynda. We got that from reading back in June 2008. If the public chooses to ignore the fact so be it. Dont think for a minute youre insulting me buddy. My moneys not left my sight into the hands of investors. Im not the one trying to get paid on a judgment! Andrew Alvitre has good mind not to bark back at your comments. He doesnt need to cope with life by responding. Your side kick justme does it feel important to you to get attention? Back earlier on the BLOG (exactly what it is a FORUM BLOG with no validity) Nikki asked if you were one of the plaintiff? It must be hard on you justme to be begging for attention while the plaintiffs has money and you have what just this blog to call your own. To part of something? Im done crapping now. Lynda & Andrew thanks for financing our home!

the world would be a better place if when someone was stupid enough to do a crime like Lynda Steele did that she would just admit it. Why have to be a con artist and scammer and then go around mad at being caught? Just go to jail soon and serve your time and pay these people back! How ashamed she should be when the sheriff comes to her door to start taking all of her possessions. A lesson would be for these people Never think or believe you are smarter then everyone else when it is apparent that you are not. And you should feel terrible has a mother doing this to your kids. Who wants their kids to have a felon for a mother! Where is your love for them? This kind of person is exactly why the world is the way it is . And for Lynda's brother to scam and take money from soldiers just coming home from being deployed. It's public record for those of you that are skeptical. Shame on this whole family.

take a course in spelling CC. LOL The trial did not go forward for Ms. Steele since she admitted to FRAUD . As for Mr. Alvire there will be a new trial and it will be posted as soon as it is served on him and a date set. I will post the judgment here if you are either to lazy or to dumb to find the courthouse if you like! Amazing Mr. Alvitre stated he would post here when was exonerated and surprise surprise he has not. Maybe because he was in the courtroom and knows exactly what the judge said? Think about how you might feel if you were defrauded in this way. Would you let it go and say great someone took my money and I just move on. Bet you wouldnt though I doubt you would be able to do what we have accomplished! As for being fascinated by me thanks! Kisses LOL

take a course in spelling CC. LOL The trial did not go forward for Ms. Steele since she admitted to FRAUD . As for Mr. Alvire there will be a new trial and it will be posted as soon as it is served on him and a date set. I will post the judgment here if you are either to lazy or to dumb to find the courthouse if you like! Amazing Mr. Alvitre stated he would post here when was exonerated and surprise surprise he has not. Maybe because he was in the courtroom and knows exactly what the judge said? Think about how you might feel if you were defrauded in this way. Would you let it go and say great someone took my money and I just move on. Bet you wouldnt though I doubt you would be able to do what we have accomplished! As for being fascinated by me thanks! Kisses LOL

take a course in spelling CC. LOL The trial did not go forward for Ms. Steele since she admitted to FRAUD . As for Mr. Alvire there will be a new trial and it will be posted as soon as it is served on him and a date set. I will post the judgment here if you are either to lazy or to dumb to find the courthouse if you like! Amazing Mr. Alvitre stated he would post here when was exonerated and surprise surprise he has not. Maybe because he was in the courtroom and knows exactly what the judge said? Think about how you might feel if you were defrauded in this way. Would you let it go and say great someone took my money and I just move on. Bet you wouldnt though I doubt you would be able to do what we have accomplished! As for being fascinated by me thanks! Kisses LOL

does the star shine bright in Harnett county? explain why a trial didn't go forward circus monkey? I love my pam cant forget her. you though Im fascinated about. here you try then try. all you do is type blogs forums cant seem to get anywhere. trash talker thats what you are. a chiuaua barking between the fences. oooooooooooooo joint checking accounts oooooooooooooooooooo

make up your mind. One minute you are for Pam and now the next for Andrew. I assume the laws have changed since you worked in the legal systems?:) Per the Judge Mr. Alvitre had dismissed without predjudice giving the plaintiffs one year to take him back to court. And they will . There is a very specific reason Mr. Alvitre's part of trial had to be put on hold. Ask him or yourself what he knows about the money that he stated he never had any knowledge of or had any way to get his hands on it then why was he on joint accounts. not one but joint accounts? As for evidence that will be shown at his trial. He is not exonerated, he is not off the hook. And why insult when you see something that is true and been posted and is public record? If I came across as dumb as you seem to then I would expect an insult:) I will post again when the new newspaper article comes out soon!

I worked in legal systems and will tell you ALVITRE got dismissed because you DONT , I repeat you DONT have evidence to convict or go to trial I come across as dumb? YOU are the dumb plaintiff. Its no wonder

Andrew did not get dismissed. Mr. Alvitre has what is called dismissal without predjudice which means he can and will be sued within one year. There is a reason for it. Ms. Steele admitted to FRAUD and has over $1 million in judgments against her. There will be some kind of criminal charges since so many agencies are looking into it. As for wire fraud, she admitted to the Fraud and that will be one of the charges. It is all now public record and can be read for yourself at the courthouse! And there will be another article in the paper soon. There will be more coming soon. This lady needs to stop what she has been doing and that is the intention here. She admitted FRAUD and took money from people. That is something she needs to be punished by the legal system for.

wire fraud? did u come up with this all by yourself? IS IT TRUE ANDREW GOT DISMISSED? D-I-S-M-I-S-S-E-D? you want to tell us how he got dismissed? rumor has it he done with the lawsuit!

WIRE FRAUD - 18 USC 1343, makes it a Federal crime or offense for anyone to use interstate wire communications facilities in carrying out a scheme to defraud. A person can be found guilty of that offense only if all of the following facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt: First: That the person knowingly and willfully devised a scheme to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false pretenses, representations or promises; and Second: That the person knowingly transmitted or caused to be transmitted by wire in interstate commerce some sound for the purpose of executing the scheme to defraud. It is not necessary that the Government prove all of the details concerning the precise nature and purpose of the scheme; or that the material transmitted by wire was itself false or fraudulent; or that the alleged scheme actually succeeded in defrauding anyone; or that the use of interstate wire communications facilities was intended as the specific or exclusive means of accomplishing the alleged fraud. What must be proved is that the person knowingly and willfully devised or intended to devise a scheme to defraud; and that the use of the interstate wire communications facilities was closely related to the scheme because the person either wired something or caused it to be wired in interstate commerce in an attempt to execute or carry out the scheme. To "cause" interstate wire facilities to be used is to do an act with knowledge that the use of the wires will follow in the ordinary course of business or where such use can reasonably be foreseen. Each separate use of the interstate wire facilities in furtherance of a scheme to defraud constitutes a separate offense.

Lynda S. Steele's profile has been removed from LinkedIn.com due to what happened in the lawsuit. And that is the beginning! Stay tuned for next week's findings!

you come across dumb Next week all will be told as to what the results are. As for criminal charges should be soon!

Circus monkey orchestrated a lawsuit!! whats the outcome? where's the print to that? What happened at trial. I showed up to court to listen in on this case they told me it was COMPLETE??? Has Andrew or Lynda been arrested? Youre posting the complaint but no results?? Get the public the R-E-S-U-L-T-S

for the rest of the story to be printed in the Fayetteville Observer soon!

This was an article on the front page of the Fayetteville Observer today 05/13/2009! Investors' lawsuit accuses pair of loan fraud By Drew Brooks Staff writer Two former Fayetteville loan officers who once gave a pregnant waitress a $1,000 tip are accused of bilking investors out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The investors allege in a lawsuit filed in May 2008 that Andrew Alvitre and Lynda Steele failed to repay almost $700,000 to eight people in North Carolina, California and New York. The lawsuit, filed in Cumberland County Superior Court, also names Family First Mortgage Corp., a business that Alvitre formerly operated. Steele is identified by several last names, including Alvitre, Spiel and Seng-Peth Bounnharaj, according to court documents. Lawyers in the case met Monday to file a pretrial motion. A trial, expected to last four days, will be scheduled for a later date, according to court documents. According to the lawsuit, Steele obtained several loans between 2004 and 2007 from the investors, many of whom met Steele and Alvitre while attending seminars they hosted at Fayetteville hotels. The plaintiffs are John Barron Brown of Harnett County; Elmer H. and Patricia J. Hebert of Alameda County, Calif.; Mark Kanczak of Wake County and his mother, Margaret Kanczak, of Erie County, N.Y.; Robert F. and Eleanor L. McGinnis of Cumberland County; and Jason C. Spencer of Wilmington. The money was supposed to be used to invest in real estate in Cumberland County, Charlotte and Wilmington. But the investors allege that the pair paid little, if any, of the loans back and did not buy the agreed-upon properties. Steele also obtained a BMW from one investor but stopped making payments on the vehicle after one year, the documents allege. Instead of paying her debts, Steele testified in a court deposition that she used the money to pay other investors, pay wages to Family First employees, pay for an addition to the company's building at 2206 Hope Mills Road and make loans to other parties. Lawyers for the defendants did not return messages left with their offices Tuesday. Neither Steele nor Alvitre are currently licensed as loan officers in the state. Steele voluntarily surrendered her license in October 2007 after being investigated by Fayetteville police and the state commissioner of banks. In a related court order filed in Wake County, Steele was barred from engaging in mortgage lending within the state in any capacity. Steele was investigated by Richard L. Hendricks, financial crimes investigator for the state commissioner of banks, who said in an affidavit filed with the court order that Steele was being investigated by Fayetteville police for orchestrating an alleged pyramid scheme. The investors in that alleged scheme are the same ones who filed the civil suit, according to the affidavit. Hendricks said in the affidavit that Sgt. Keith Benedict, a Fayetteville police detective, was investigating several complaints alleging that Steele obtained property by false pretense. The affidavit said that Steele filed for bankruptcy and that Benedict found that Steele did not file tax returns for 2005 and 2006. Court documents show Steele's bankruptcy case was dismissed in July 2007. A spokeswoman for Fayetteville police was not available Tuesday to discuss the status of the criminal investigation, and no criminal charges appear to have been filed against Steele or Alvitre in recent years, according to court records. Steele and Alvitre were previously known in Fayetteville for their generosity at an International House of Pancakes. According to a 2006 Fayetteville Observer story, the pair earned a reputation for occasionally paying the checks for other tables, especially if the patrons were soldiers. In March 2006, the pair gave a pregnant waitress a $1,000 tip as a belated baby shower gift. Staff writer Drew Brooks can be reached at [email protected] or 486-35

This was an article on the front page of the Fayetteville Observer today 05/13/2009! Investors' lawsuit accuses pair of loan fraud By Drew Brooks Staff writer Two former Fayetteville loan officers who once gave a pregnant waitress a $1,000 tip are accused of bilking investors out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The investors allege in a lawsuit filed in May 2008 that Andrew Alvitre and Lynda Steele failed to repay almost $700,000 to eight people in North Carolina, California and New York. The lawsuit, filed in Cumberland County Superior Court, also names Family First Mortgage Corp., a business that Alvitre formerly operated. Steele is identified by several last names, including Alvitre, Spiel and Seng-Peth Bounnharaj, according to court documents. Lawyers in the case met Monday to file a pretrial motion. A trial, expected to last four days, will be scheduled for a later date, according to court documents. According to the lawsuit, Steele obtained several loans between 2004 and 2007 from the investors, many of whom met Steele and Alvitre while attending seminars they hosted at Fayetteville hotels. The plaintiffs are John Barron Brown of Harnett County; Elmer H. and Patricia J. Hebert of Alameda County, Calif.; Mark Kanczak of Wake County and his mother, Margaret Kanczak, of Erie County, N.Y.; Robert F. and Eleanor L. McGinnis of Cumberland County; and Jason C. Spencer of Wilmington. The money was supposed to be used to invest in real estate in Cumberland County, Charlotte and Wilmington. But the investors allege that the pair paid little, if any, of the loans back and did not buy the agreed-upon properties. Steele also obtained a BMW from one investor but stopped making payments on the vehicle after one year, the documents allege. Instead of paying her debts, Steele testified in a court deposition that she used the money to pay other investors, pay wages to Family First employees, pay for an addition to the company's building at 2206 Hope Mills Road and make loans to other parties. Lawyers for the defendants did not return messages left with their offices Tuesday. Neither Steele nor Alvitre are currently licensed as loan officers in the state. Steele voluntarily surrendered her license in October 2007 after being investigated by Fayetteville police and the state commissioner of banks. In a related court order filed in Wake County, Steele was barred from engaging in mortgage lending within the state in any capacity. Steele was investigated by Richard L. Hendricks, financial crimes investigator for the state commissioner of banks, who said in an affidavit filed with the court order that Steele was being investigated by Fayetteville police for orchestrating an alleged pyramid scheme. The investors in that alleged scheme are the same ones who filed the civil suit, according to the affidavit. Hendricks said in the affidavit that Sgt. Keith Benedict, a Fayetteville police detective, was investigating several complaints alleging that Steele obtained property by false pretense. The affidavit said that Steele filed for bankruptcy and that Benedict found that Steele did not file tax returns for 2005 and 2006. Court documents show Steele's bankruptcy case was dismissed in July 2007. A spokeswoman for Fayetteville police was not available Tuesday to discuss the status of the criminal investigation, and no criminal charges appear to have been filed against Steele or Alvitre in recent years, according to court records. Steele and Alvitre were previously known in Fayetteville for their generosity at an International House of Pancakes. According to a 2006 Fayetteville Observer story, the pair earned a reputation for occasionally paying the checks for other tables, especially if the patrons were soldiers. In March 2006, the pair gave a pregnant waitress a $1,000 tip as a belated baby shower gift. Staff writer Drew Brooks can be reached at [email protected] or 486-35

This was an article on the front page of the Fayetteville Observer today 05/13/2009! Investors' lawsuit accuses pair of loan fraud By Drew Brooks Staff writer Two former Fayetteville loan officers who once gave a pregnant waitress a $1,000 tip are accused of bilking investors out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The investors allege in a lawsuit filed in May 2008 that Andrew Alvitre and Lynda Steele failed to repay almost $700,000 to eight people in North Carolina, California and New York. The lawsuit, filed in Cumberland County Superior Court, also names Family First Mortgage Corp., a business that Alvitre formerly operated. Steele is identified by several last names, including Alvitre, Spiel and Seng-Peth Bounnharaj, according to court documents. Lawyers in the case met Monday to file a pretrial motion. A trial, expected to last four days, will be scheduled for a later date, according to court documents. According to the lawsuit, Steele obtained several loans between 2004 and 2007 from the investors, many of whom met Steele and Alvitre while attending seminars they hosted at Fayetteville hotels. The plaintiffs are John Barron Brown of Harnett County; Elmer H. and Patricia J. Hebert of Alameda County, Calif.; Mark Kanczak of Wake County and his mother, Margaret Kanczak, of Erie County, N.Y.; Robert F. and Eleanor L. McGinnis of Cumberland County; and Jason C. Spencer of Wilmington. The money was supposed to be used to invest in real estate in Cumberland County, Charlotte and Wilmington. But the investors allege that the pair paid little, if any, of the loans back and did not buy the agreed-upon properties. Steele also obtained a BMW from one investor but stopped making payments on the vehicle after one year, the documents allege. Instead of paying her debts, Steele testified in a court deposition that she used the money to pay other investors, pay wages to Family First employees, pay for an addition to the company's building at 2206 Hope Mills Road and make loans to other parties. Lawyers for the defendants did not return messages left with their offices Tuesday. Neither Steele nor Alvitre are currently licensed as loan officers in the state. Steele voluntarily surrendered her license in October 2007 after being investigated by Fayetteville police and the state commissioner of banks. In a related court order filed in Wake County, Steele was barred from engaging in mortgage lending within the state in any capacity. Steele was investigated by Richard L. Hendricks, financial crimes investigator for the state commissioner of banks, who said in an affidavit filed with the court order that Steele was being investigated by Fayetteville police for orchestrating an alleged pyramid scheme. The investors in that alleged scheme are the same ones who filed the civil suit, according to the affidavit. Hendricks said in the affidavit that Sgt. Keith Benedict, a Fayetteville police detective, was investigating several complaints alleging that Steele obtained property by false pretense. The affidavit said that Steele filed for bankruptcy and that Benedict found that Steele did not file tax returns for 2005 and 2006. Court documents show Steele's bankruptcy case was dismissed in July 2007. A spokeswoman for Fayetteville police was not available Tuesday to discuss the status of the criminal investigation, and no criminal charges appear to have been filed against Steele or Alvitre in recent years, according to court records. Steele and Alvitre were previously known in Fayetteville for their generosity at an International House of Pancakes. According to a 2006 Fayetteville Observer story, the pair earned a reputation for occasionally paying the checks for other tables, especially if the patrons were soldiers. In March 2006, the pair gave a pregnant waitress a $1,000 tip as a belated baby shower gift. Staff writer Drew Brooks can be reached at [email protected] or 486-35

Im not Andrew or Lynda. You stop your shenanigans. I want Pam names away from the headlines shes been hurt badly I want to hold her

CC, or whomever you are, you do not know Pam. Lies? Who is telling lies? What is a CC? That's not even your real identity is it? I don't even know this Pam and I can tell that you don't either. One post you're defending her and the next you're calling her a liar. Makes sense. Don't any of you yahoos have anything better to do than to sit here and sling word vomit back and forth at each other? Lynda, just because you have admitted your wrongs doesn't mean that it's alright for you to continue your shenanigans. Andrew, you need to man up and acknowledge your invlovement and stop acting as though Lynda acted on her own. You knew what was going on and you're going to pay for it.

Pam stop telling others these lies!!! No one we know lives in Ashville. No person (Ang) exist. We want to help you with your sickness

I can tell you that CC is no relation and that Pam doesn't know them. It's not anyone close to her. They HAVE to be Andrew. He is slick and sly and will use any tool he can to try to make himself look good. He has been stalking this poor woman and refuses to leave her alone. JustME, I can tell you that Pam has been informed of what is being posted on here, as she refuses to read this site. She isn't being rude, CC (OR ANDREW), is trying to make it sound as if they are a family member or know her. They do not. Andrew doesn't take rejection very well it seems. He thinks that if he plugs away at trying to find a way to contact her, she will break down. Not going to happen. He even created a Myspace page JUST to message her. This man is dangerous and I believe he is a threat to her. I want it to be public knowledge that she has made several attempts in asking him to stay away from her. In case something happens to Pam, this is posted on here for all to read. For someone as successful as he claims to be, then why can't he leave her alone and find another woman? As far as assets are concerned, she doesn't want anything from Andrew. The way he came about getting what he has probably wasn't honestly judging from what is on this site. He is a professional con man and plays on the weak. I hope that in the future anyone who deals with him will investigate him first.

You appear to come off stupid and maybe should take an anger management class LOL. And who said I'm a woman? I personally could give a rats a@@ as to what his wife gets if she has been married SO many times. My intent was just to give a heads up to what Alvitre has.

yapping back and forth. so you say the court system will take care of this which is public information then why do still bring up Pams name? Ok so she could or could not be entitled to 50/50 of the settlement during their marriage who gives? Pams been married enough times to know what shes entitled to. shes got his balls in her hands that is enough. are you the woman dressed as knight in shiny armour here to save the day? keep her name out of this mess . let us live our life. if you say the court system is taking care of it allow it finish. all your good for is spreading garbage instigating what is none of your business. a typical stupid woman thats got nothing better to do. heres something worry about your own problems. shell fight for what she thinks is hers. he can go and hide whatever assets he has we aint after it. hide it bury it burn it. why dont you and your plaintiff friends go after his company since youre so smart. we done being a part of your charade. stop typing about her.

I agree Star6 about personal. But Mr. Alvitre has taken a lot of people for a lot of money and soon that will be taken care of through the court system. Then it will be all public information. But he in his mind is good at hiding his assets and his wife may not be aware of a lot of them. She is getting divorced and should know what she is entitled to. Hopefully giving her a heads up will help her to find out all he has . 50/50

Instead of talking about personal information on here, why don't you folks just stick to what this posting started over in the first place? Who cares about someone's personal drama and who gets what? I thought the whole reason behind this posting was because someone was getting ripped off. So what do you say you bring it back to reality. Sounds like a bunch of children. Better yet, dogs yapping at each other from one yard to the other. Get back to the origin or stop posting rebuttals. Recess over.

Instead of talking about personal information on here, why don't you folks just stick to what this posting started over in the first place? Who cares about someone's personal drama and who gets what? I thought the whole reason behind this posting was because someone was getting ripped off. So what do you say you bring it back to reality. Sounds like a bunch of children. Better yet, dogs yapping at each other from one yard to the other. Get back to the origin or stop posting rebuttals. Recess over.

Instead of talking about personal information on here, why don't you folks just stick to what this posting started over in the first place? Who cares about someone's personal drama and who gets what? I thought the whole reason behind this posting was because someone was getting ripped off. So what do you say you bring it back to reality. Sounds like a bunch of children. Better yet, dogs yapping at each other from one yard to the other. Get back to the origin or stop posting rebuttals. Recess over.

Instead of talking about personal information on here, why don't you folks just stick to what this posting started over in the first place? Who cares about someone's personal drama and who gets what? I thought the whole reason behind this posting was because someone was getting ripped off. So what do you say you bring it back to reality. Sounds like a bunch of children. Better yet, dogs yapping at each other from one yard to the other. Get back to the origin or stop posting rebuttals. Recess over.

instead of posting what Pamela should ask Andrew about homes and assets, why don't you give her the point of direction on how to proceed. If they have filed for divorce you should know they dont talk. How is Pamela suppose to ask??? Whats a Wiatrak? What about it? Whats she do? Is this an open end statement? Why dont you give her a step by step procedure know it all. you mind your own or give us answers

instead of posting what Pamela should ask Andrew about homes and assets, why don't you give her the point of direction on how to proceed. If they have filed for divorce you should know they dont talk. How is Pamela suppose to ask??? Whats a Wiatrak? What about it? Whats she do? Is this an open end statement? Why dont you give her a step by step procedure know it all. you mind your own or give us answers

instead of posting what Pamela should ask Andrew about homes and assets, why don't you give her the point of direction on how to proceed. If they have filed for divorce you should know they dont talk. How is Pamela suppose to ask??? Whats a Wiatrak? What about it? Whats she do? Is this an open end statement? Why dont you give her a step by step procedure know it all. you mind your own or give us answers

instead of posting what Pamela should ask Andrew about homes and assets, why don't you give her the point of direction on how to proceed. If they have filed for divorce you should know they dont talk. How is Pamela suppose to ask??? Whats a Wiatrak? What about it? Whats she do? Is this an open end statement? Why dont you give her a step by step procedure know it all. you mind your own or give us answers

There is nothing against Mrs. Alvitre. She may be a perfectly wonderful person. Just hope that she knows all of what Andrew has. Why should she not get her fair share in the divorce settlement? Though Andrew's money is ill gotten. Ask him about his deal with Wiatrak. Mrs. Alvitre is very lucky to be rid of him.

There is nothing against Mrs. Alvitre. She may be a perfectly wonderful person. Just hope that she knows all of what Andrew has. Why should she not get her fair share in the divorce settlement? Though Andrew's money is ill gotten. Ask him about his deal with Wiatrak. Mrs. Alvitre is very lucky to be rid of him.

Pamela and her family doesnt want any of you to write to her nor do they want you talking about them. LEAVE THEM IN PEACE. They went through enough with Andrew NO MORE. You're not a lawyer. All you want to do is stir up a mess. Politely stop doing this. What ever issues you have between Lynda and Andrew is YOUR personal business, not Pamela's. She's a smart girl and only wants to live her life. Don't give her anymore problems, JUSTME. Mind your business

Hey Mrs. Alvitre Just some advice. When you are divorcing Andrew make sure your lawyer checks out what assets he has in his company ABC MTG Advisory Group!. He says he is broke... but hmmm.... he seems to have a lot of hidden assets and half of them belongs to you. You deserve it for having to put up with the lying loser Go for half!! And say Hey To his partner in CRIME Seng!

You are an ACTIVE loan officer? Go to NCCOb to find that out for sure!

Cite your evidence to substantiate your allegations. Thus far, none of the exhibits supplied imply wrongdoing from my standpoint. I tell you: If you've got it in writing you've got a prayer and if not, all you've got is hot air... Demonstrate bonafide documentation to back your claims or allegations on behalf of others (assuming this is whom I suspect again) or gracefully or not, bow out and let the chips fall where they may. I am disappointed in the current circumstances that the plaintiffs and main defendant are in. I am especially disappointed in the circumstances that the wrongfully alleged defendants (FFMC/Self) are in as well. On a lighter note, I am pleased to see some semblance of a settlement arrangement pending to be hammered out (at least when I left mediation counselors were intent on achieving a settlement with acceptable terms to my knowledge) by the main defendant counsel and plaintiff counsel as well as those parties. Are you implying that you are "anti-settlement" at this juncture and if so, who are you definitively? I remind you that the main defendant has already admitted default on the principal sums accounted for during deposition and desires a viable plan of resolution as well as quiet enjoyment, i.e., opportunity to make good on said balances without disruption and hassle as this would hinder payout. To my knowledge, plaintiffs conversely desire to be made whole. Whether or not a settlement is feasible or "practically received" and accepted by all remains to be determined via counsel negotiations of the parties that matter in this case. The chips will fall where they may. My hope is that the end result will be a reasonable outcome for the parties that matter in this matter. I have always maintained a stance of mediator to help mitigate losses and exposure and to damage control the matters once certain matter/s I could assist with became a blip on my radar screen even though it was not my position to intervene. For the inquiring minds that are watching this unfold, stay tuned as this matter unwinds. I realize you and/or your aliases and/or others may further potentially mud sling and attempt to provoke me here. However, I will remain silent until the final outcome on this medium from this point moving forward. To respond again at this point by me would be unnecessary splitting of hairs and I will not waste others time by going into dog chasing tail mode over any shenanigans. It is what it is. Andrew Alvitre - Mortgage Banker/Broker/Certified Residential Mortgage Specialist/Active Licensed Loan Officer in our great state of North Carolina (no pending investigations with regulators) and a professional that cares for his clientele well being... out.

Mr. Alvitre You are not represented by counsel by your own choosing . You are no where near out of the case as you seem to state. There is no resolution and the trial will commence and there is no proof that you are just considered guilty by association The trial will show the truth.

It has been a long road and appears that the parties involved are theoretically making headway. For clarification, the parties involved have not been to court or trial. For the sake of information awareness and without attempting to instigate the matter further, I will simply state that what I have stated thus far has been validated. The parties involved (and/or representation for the one/more of the parties) have met thrice in a formal capacity: 1/2) 2 days worth of depositions from the main defendant and myself as witness/defendant. 3) Mediation today for a resolution prior to the matter going to trial. This matter has not fully shaken out as of now. However, I am confident in my position of imminent vindication as stated previously. I only wish that I could "fast forward" the process to retain a final result and conclusion in an effort to move forward from this to deter this disruption. Lynda Steele (main defendant that should be the sole true/correct defendant) and/or her Atty. are in direct negotiations now with the plaintiffs to hammer out a viable plan to make them whole. If they do not come to an agreeable conclusion, the case goes to trial. If they do come to an agreeable conclusion, I and FFMC are to be dismissed from the case. If the case goes to trial, I can only speak for myself and have already made my position known to the plaintiffs that I will seek (as mentioned in earlier dialogue here) a dismissal with prejudice (res judicata) meaning that upon my successful dismissal, I will not be able to be tried again for this erroneous/inaccurate matter brought against me. I am merely guilty by association. Unfortunately I have suffered substantial damages (personally and professionally of both monetary and non-monetary capacity) and may or may not confer with counsel to recover said damages of both a professional and personal nature in light of malicious actions brought forth against me by certain specific parties. Additionally, "opportunity lost" has been realized by many families, friends and homeowners that I call friends of whom I would have aided with intelligent and expert (the intelligent and expert excerpts stated to me by others I will add) counsel had this disruption and/or the malicious actions taken against me not transpired. From a selfless perspective, they are bigger losers than I am as a result of this matter. Stay tuned.

Andrew found innocent wasn't he? Its quiet did the judge make you stop bothering andrew?

Andrew found innocent wasn't he? Its quiet did the judge make you stop bothering andrew?

Andrew found innocent wasn't he? Its quiet did the judge make you stop bothering andrew?

Andrew found innocent wasn't he? Its quiet did the judge make you stop bothering andrew?

You should know you can't contact plaintiffs

I do not frequent ITZ nor do I wish to meet you there or anywhere nor have I met you. Please find someone else to harrass. Best of luck to you at ITZ without me. Andrew

Sunday at ITz me and my friends will be looking for you. Your in our prayers. Justice for all!!! Don't let the white man take you down. I aint running away. Stand up for your freedom.

Nikki, please go away and find another venue as you bring zero value to this thread. Thanks! To the others, don't let a good argument get ruined on account of the facts...

Nikki, please go away and find another venue as you bring zero value to this thread. Thanks! To the others, don't let a good argument get ruined on account of the facts...

you got a hard head andrew. when someumm is in your face this good you resist it. Boy that explains your life in a nutshell. Ya know my auntie worked for yall on hope mills rd she. she was this finance person who got people to buy homes. shes the black woman

I restate, find another venue. 3 sides to every story exist imo and unless you have built a pattern of trust, integrity and credibility I personally disregard your input esp. when you do not validate who you are. I don't know you nor is this a venue for anything other than matters of substance and bonafide information pertaining to matters involving suggested wrongs, etc. Please operate and post within that scope. Thanks, Andrew

Girl we worked at Davis together U don't remember that? You got short term memory? Andrew she talk smack bout you to every one at the clinic. She's watchin U go down

Neither I nor my wife know who you are. I am not interested in dialoguing with anyone here unless they have something valid in support of what this site was intended for. Please find another venue. Thanks in advance. Andrew

Hi Andrew!!! Your typing is absolutely superb. Yet I'm somewhat still processing what you said. Do you speak like this in person? Do you have a college degree in writing? I'm working on getting my associates dental hygenist. we googled your name then found images of you in a black shirt. It's hard to zoom on the photo. I like the picture very much. It's a bummer to read all these nasty comments about you, but I don't believe them. Me and my girlfriends was talking about how the court systems aint fair then to make it worser this low down site lettin any body and there dogs get on to talk trash about you. It's LUDACRIOUS! Yall say this Remax company cost a million? Is that a million dollars? You was rolling like that? You got that kinda money to buy that building? Let's keep it real. The imposters they aint gonna reveal there true identity. Folks like that seat around dinner tables talk smack about anything. So racist. You do anything for superbowl? you can find me and my girlfriends at ITZ. hope 2 C U there

Let's just agree to disagree. Continue... Don't identify who you are and continue to hide behind your identity/ies. Don't act in a forthright and straight up capacity and tear down and manipulate from a distance while shirking accountability. Continue the dramatics to your audience of only a few that actually appreciate your input while you and they deny valid credibility as a result of your non transparency in the first place. Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Really? I'm in dog chasing tail mode with you yahoos. On the other hand, positively identify yourself and put some order to your questions or suggested wrongdoings and I would be happy to address them straight up. As far as the Re/Max franchise is concerned... 3 of us applied to ReMax Carolina's and I won't specify names of the other applicants as that would violate privacy. Steele was not a party to the application. What point of substance are you attempting to surface? Big deal, the application was shot down for reasons I will not elaborate upon as that would violate privacy as well but that is a non issue and private amongst the parties... And your point is? Irrelevant. Please bring something with substance forth. I really feel dumber after engaging in these tirades and foolish chatter with you buffoon/s so let me reiterate to you something. Please condense your allegations and bottom line me with substance. Feel free to take as long as you need. Digest it, let it culminate and marinate on your brain pallete then review and tweak it again; wordsmith your input before you post it to ensure that it has viable substance in the first place for the sake of the audience here let alone ourselves. Good luck and I know you can do it; I'm proud of you in advance and am forward thinking enough to think that even a naysayer such as yourself will register (this blinding flash of the obvious to me) this small call to action as a small piece of pure logic and substance for you to put in your pipe and smoke. I will hope and pray that you are able to grasp that concept and who knows? You and others may just surprise me - I'm hoping that the voice of reason will become contagious... In either case, if you can not ante up some semblance of logical substance than quit posting your shenanigans and go - not mad and not ugly, just elsewhere. Good day and adieu.

FYI Tree! Where did it say anything about me seeing Mr. Alvtre having dinner with Ms. Steele. My claims are you TREE don't know what your saying. Mrs. A. AKA Pamela how do you know she's on Ms. Steele's side. FYI she hates Ms. Steele. In America we're all innocent until proven guilty? YES?? Ms. Steele is GUILTY they need to send her back to China. Yall make accusations but have any of you talked to him? Yeh I know. Waiting on the trial by jury? The jurors if are from Fayetteville would already make up there mind cause you folks report this nonsense for people to read. You mean to tell me he's nothing but a horrible man? Andrew Alvtres got sense not to reply to your comments it's tiresome for anyone to read then respond to you folks. You tell me Tree how Mrs A. (there's only 1 Mrs. A didn't you read?? Lynda and Andrew weren't married) is on her side? Cat fight cat fight! Who are you anyway Tree? You folks can't give out your real names? What's a star47 or JustME?? This is justice?? Thank God yall can't be jurors. Get a grip be fair. After all he is HUMAN but are you Tree? or just a trunk with branches?

you would be wrong. I am not in the lawsuit. Everyone is not guilty to me except for Mr. Alvitre and Ms. Steele. Mr. Alvitre hasn't bothered to respond to the above posts so what does that tell you? He doesn't want to answer the Remax questions perhaps? And go for it if you want him, whatever floats your boat. If you like a man you have to take care of.:)

For someone who claims to have worked with his wife, how would you know about the innocence of someone involved in this case? Are you masquerading under a false name and know Mr. Alvitre better than you are letting on? Unless you are reporting something regarding to the case, you should stray away from the personal drama and save yourself from further postings by just asking for his email address so you can hope to communicate with him personally. If he was in fact seen out having dinner with Ms. Steele, then chances are they are working together to get their story 'on line'. My whole reason for commenting was that I was hoping to communicate to Mr. Alvitre that there are real people that he has affected in his charade. I want justice to be served to all of those who look as though they could use a helping of it.

No you can not go to a deposition only plaintiffs and defendants are allowed Mr. Alvitre is not innocent by any means. He was not tricked proof positive

I'm sticking to that story. My girlfriends and me read the courthouse report. We got it when we heard the story about him that's back when Pam was his girlfriend. That Tree guy's making up stories. Pam will tell ya herself she left him cause he's a no good SOB. She's not saying she got dumped. I asked if anybody can show up at the deposition or trial can anybody answer that? I'm here to support Andrew Alvtre. She filed a police report? What for? She aint all that now people. Yall want to put an innocent man on trial this is so racist. He was framed tricked manipulated to do all those things. That person posing as justme, everyone is guilty to you aint they? It doesn't take a genius to know you in the lawsuit too? He's guilty of loving the wrong women I'm tellin ya. When the trial, soon? Is it in Cumberland county? Andrew if I had lots of money I'd give it to you.

Go to the courthouse , its all public record. Mr. Alvitre is no innocent or tricked in anyway. Proof to that fact

When is the trial gonna take place? Can we read up on this. I read on blog/forum about deposition? Whats that about? Can anyone sit in on it? I feel bad for this guy. You all could be wrong about him. He liked the wrong women like Lynda for one. She coulda got him to believe her she tricked him. So what if he's dodging questions? He's free to do what he wishes. So what if his wife supported him it's a 50/50 marriage. She choose to marry him. If I was married to him I'd worship the ground he walked on and that's a FACT. When's the divorce final? I love Hispanic men!!!! especially one that can type like you.

Okay, folks. First of all, you once again fail to identify yourself indicative of someone not being transparent and hiding behind a keyboard to antagonize and manipulate in a slick capacity. Identify yourself or walk away. JUST ME, or whomever you are this time: My apologies if you were invited to a linked in connection. Please disregard the invite as it was a blanket invite to my address book. Tree63 or whomever you are this time: Looks like I ruffled your feathers with all of your frantic posts that have been blasted out aimlessly like cannon fodder. Jesse, I have a formal date already set via Arbitrators and plaintiffs over this fiasco involving 2 improper defendants (self and mortgage firm), etc. that is going to take place sometime in the very near future. Why would I meet you before hand esp. if it will not affect bonafide results? Will a poster with substance that will identify him/herself please stand up?

Mr. Alvitre can't give a straight answer and never responded to your dinner invite. For someone who seemed to be hell bent on finding out who you "really" are Jesse, you think he would have jumped at the opportunity. Hmm... Who's the m-o-r-a-l-c-o-w-a-r-d now?

Multiple sources? Not from this venue as this venue does not validate any source. I suspect that the sources are either one source or more than one source. However, the reality is that the information that has already been referenced is either to be deferred for the actual case or simply immaterial and nothing more than naysayers smack talking others (including self) and identifying pure foolishness identified by the naysayers actions. How goes the saying? And I will paraphrase... "It's better to look like a fool vs. both look and sound like a fool by opening a mouth (or keystroke in this case) and removing all doubt..." The personal references and complaints are inaccurate and your points here really are a non-issue lacking any meat or substance. In other words, you talk alot but lack delivery. Why don't you elaborate on how specifically I am a phoney and a liar. State specific scenarios. Sounds to me that if you could have you would have. Your supposed wife being floored is a non-issue and immaterial to this venue's purpose let alone not a viable factor here. Again, find another venue for your gossip and dramatics. How specifically is my knack of good business a joke to Richard? I do not recall ever having an encounter with a Richard during my tenure as a mortgage professional over a 10 year period and hundreds of satisfied customers, business partners, realtors, financial planners, and many others both B2B and B2C. The fact is Jesse that you are what the army calls a pop and no kick - a dud and lack substance. I think you would be better served simply hiding behind your keyboard and lurking in the background because you sir (if you really are a male and not Lynda - behind your alias...) are a m-o-r-a-l c-o-w-a-r-d. Identify yourself publicly accurately why don't you with correct spelling and an address? If not, back pedal and hide as your cards are called and your hand is looking a tad weak. What say you now manipulator?

Just an FYI, you do know Mr. Alvitre that you cannot contact plaintiffs in your lawsuit

Just an FYI, you do know Mr. Alvitre that you cannot contact plaintiffs in your lawsuit

Just an FYI, you do know Mr. Alvitre that you cannot contact plaintiffs in your lawsuit

Just an FYI, you do know Mr. Alvitre that you cannot contact plaintiffs in your lawsuit

When in doubt read about yourself in all reports and complaints put out by JUSTME Star47 and multiple sources. Your personal life was brought out by many others IF you take your time to read. Thanks to Richard along with his PI (supposedly) they felt the desire to let others be aware your a liar and phoney not only professional but also personally. Seng was reported on ripoff too. He lives with his parents according to that compliant. You lived with his parents according the story from beginning to now. No conflict there? No one here gives two cents concerning your personal situation. You left yourself open to those comments. My wife was floored reading your plea to your wife. Thus Richard says your knack of good business is a joke. I agree with him/her. Who blew up your head? A coward hiding behind a computer? Does rip off have a dine in where we can meet it would be a pleasure to meet you. I live in Hope Mills. We can meet at the courthouse. Bring your list of investors.

When in doubt read about yourself in all reports and complaints put out by JUSTME Star47 and multiple sources. Your personal life was brought out by many others IF you take your time to read. Thanks to Richard along with his PI (supposedly) they felt the desire to let others be aware your a liar and phoney not only professional but also personally. Seng was reported on ripoff too. He lives with his parents according to that compliant. You lived with his parents according the story from beginning to now. No conflict there? No one here gives two cents concerning your personal situation. You left yourself open to those comments. My wife was floored reading your plea to your wife. Thus Richard says your knack of good business is a joke. I agree with him/her. Who blew up your head? A coward hiding behind a computer? Does rip off have a dine in where we can meet it would be a pleasure to meet you. I live in Hope Mills. We can meet at the courthouse. Bring your list of investors.

When in doubt read about yourself in all reports and complaints put out by JUSTME Star47 and multiple sources. Your personal life was brought out by many others IF you take your time to read. Thanks to Richard along with his PI (supposedly) they felt the desire to let others be aware your a liar and phoney not only professional but also personally. Seng was reported on ripoff too. He lives with his parents according to that compliant. You lived with his parents according the story from beginning to now. No conflict there? No one here gives two cents concerning your personal situation. You left yourself open to those comments. My wife was floored reading your plea to your wife. Thus Richard says your knack of good business is a joke. I agree with him/her. Who blew up your head? A coward hiding behind a computer? Does rip off have a dine in where we can meet it would be a pleasure to meet you. I live in Hope Mills. We can meet at the courthouse. Bring your list of investors.

Jesse, you are a clown. First of all, you lose credibility by not citing who you really are and hide behind a keyboard to make vicious attacks from a distance out of foolishness and ugliness. You really need to find another venue to smacktalk at. Your intelligence is undermined and I'm not impressed nor am I concerned because the bottom line is that you still lack substance. Educate? You are an idiot and do not know my personal situation between myself and my "beautiful wife" and no, you don't know what you don't know. I'm not going to elaborate on my personal situation with a stranger nor on a public forum nor with anyone other than my wife. Why does it matter to you that I entered into a contract for deed or installment land contract? I am in a decent positive equity position and as far as cash flow is concerned, it is about break even. So the ILC's balloon in 2 years... I have arrangements in place and capacity to deliver. SO what? What is your point? Looks to me like you are really grasping at straws in a feeble attempt to make something stick and it's not working. Jesse, Lynda, or whomever you are... Sounds like you are bitter over nonsense and need to backpedal and butt out. Go talk smack elsewhere, attempt to plant seeds of doubt elsewhere and run away with your tail between your legs because as stated before, you are a moral coward. As far as the notary is concerned, he is not a party to the transaction and a disinterested party as a notary with his notary license still in tact. Whomever I decide to use to notarize documents is a non-issue just so long as a conflict of interest doesn't exist and the license is active and in this case that is the case. Try again Jesse or whatever your alias is this time...

Headline news Andrew Alvitre cries out to his wife Pamela Jean through rip off report to take him back. The most beautiful woman in the world. You don't get out much do you? He ex husbands didn't tell her much did they? Did she know how beautiful she was when with you? Your soft spoken words didn't convince her to stay? yet ms Steele tolerated you for how long? from what we know she was out doing her own thing ignoring you most of the relationship she careless of your involement. Why didn't Pamela Jean Alvitre sign the promissory notes just you? The addresses on the property is the same address where you lived isnt it? Then its only you who obligated yourself to the loan why cause she knows you won't have the money when the time comes? Thats alot to worry about for a wife recently married that knows nothing about her husbands history. What did Kierstan say she doesn't know real estate? Lets educate Pamela Jean. Your husband signed a promissory note for close to $67,000 to be paid in 2 years. He has contracts on trailers. How did the contract or deeds get recorded without her signatures? Pamela get a lawyer you got things to work on girl. Your divorce lawyers aint going have any clues with what your husbands got his hands in. If your depressed now wait two years your up s**+**t creek. His business partner Seng notarized it too? thats priceless. Tx for the input kierstan richard nikki

I'm not going to delve into my personal life with you. This is not a venue for that and you Jesse (or whomever you are) are not entitled to know anything about myself or my beautiful wife and our personal lives and yes, she is the most beautiful woman in the world and I am proud to have her in my life. Lastly, please defer to my previous post about BLUFing your dialogue and your need to find another venue to s**t talk and gossip. Let me call a spade a spade by stating that you are nothing more than a moral coward and mental midget for not identifying yourself completely and the mere fact that you don't post anything of substance indicates your lack of consideration for the site's intent. As a result you have lost instant credibility by mere fact that you lack substance. And yes, I am blessed in many ways and grateful for the blessings as well. I could easily elaborate for hours but this too is not the venue for that either isn't it?

Gotta hand it to this guy. You ought to be writing cards versus working where it is your working. That's the way you should be spending your holiday on ripoff report then don't forget to compliment the wife that left you so the world knows she's beautiful blah blah blah. That's the classic case of butt kissing. That's the holiday spirit Richard, you hired a PI and this what you found? The wife left him? Man get your refund. Does this woman leaving him any substance to the case, oh to testify? Have you gotten any idea what she knows about him?? NOTHING. She's busy getting married and divorce didnt your read? Ms Steele left him then kicked him out of her home didn't you find that out? That info was free by the way. Scroll up and READ yeah happy holidays man cause you should be thankful your a very blessed guy. How you really feeling deep down??your in denial

My personal life is not an issue here. I have not responded to the multiple attacks by either one or more people (whether by the same person or not) that have made outlandish claims about myself alleging history of my personal actions. None of that is what this venue is about. It is nonsense, it is not accurate and meant to do nothing more than attack my character and create further strife and manipulation. The problem is that anyone can create any claim and pop off with foolishness on the internet without having to verify the validity of the claim they make. Anyone can come here and create multiple aliases and proceed to mud sling foolishness for personal gain. I don't care who the individual or group of individuals are or allege to be whether ex, wannabe private investigators, past employees, past coworkers, tom, d**k, sally, whomever... The simple fact that I have not responded to the foolishness and specific claims does not suggest that I condone the information as accurate or anything of the sort. I just refuse to give any weight to the stupidity and remind the posters to cut the personal fluff (it doesn't belong here) and BLUF the facts or problem. If and when you do post, please respect this venue for the spirit it was intended for and maintain the integrity of it assuming that you have any integrity and conscience to respect it and be mindful of it in the first place. If you are sociopath and a mental case as I suspect at least one of the posters is than you will ignore anything I am saying here anyways which only suggests how pointless this entire venue has become. As an eternal optimist, I will presume you know the difference but the realist in me anticipates this not to be the case.

Whomever you are... I want to thank you for your input but agree to disagree with you. It does not matter what your personal views are about myself or my beautiful and lovely wife. This venue is not meant for you to spread gossip or to vent by spreading your nonsense so please find some other venue that you may use to naysay, speculate and talk smack at. Your elaborate stories do nothing other than fuel your concocted foolishness. When you have an issue to address that has some substance behind it (assuming it is of a non-personal nature), BLUF it: Bottom Line Underlying Factor - Be direct, specific and transparent when citing your problem or concern that requires a resolution and provide any supporting information you have on hand. Something tells me that you have nothing to say that you know really anything about or you would have brought it forth by now. Merry Xmas and God bless you and your family (whomever you are or perpetrate to be) on Jesus's birthday. We are blessed and have much to be thankful for, I know I am and I am.

I have no idea who this wife of his is, only the fact that she has left him. We have our own PI's that gather information on whom we need it gathered. I don't know or care what she does at work or home, just that she may be called to testify. Keep the personal drama out of the business arena.

I worked with Andrews wife Pamela at the Dental clinics on Fort Bragg at both places. Theres no such person by the name of Kierstan. I know her ex husband Mark too. Pam I know is behind the Richard guy. Some of the girls after we read the report knew Pam was typing up some op these things. She was diagnosed with bipolar and taking antidepressants even Mark didnt know just us at work knew. Pams got Christian things hung all over her cubicle but we know shes the phoney. Pam you lie too to everybody at work. Speaking from the people that has been in her past it couldnt be that she couldnt hold up her marriage number 4 could it Richard? Do you remember when you post the response before and forgot to change your name Kierstan then went back and changed it? Andrew take your children and run. If you need someone to talk to call Mark.

About the Baker contract, it's strange how many times its gone back and forth between Lynda and yourself and Judy and Dan. As to your personal life I agree people shouldnt put it out there. Has nothing to do with this. And having 100% confidence is a good thing for either side!:)

My knack for doing great business has been the result of 100's of satisfied consumers. Whoever you are or whatever your alias is this time... You make a blanket statement with no substance behind it. Cite specifics or nothing at all. That's right, you can only mudsling from a distance and hope it sticks. Well, your attempts are futile and not sticking. My personal life is not a point of discussion here. Conclusion of trial will show what is true... I agree and at that time I will be vindicated of any wrongdoing. The deal with the Bakers is an installment land contract (aka contract for deed) for real estate. What is your point?

Can you explain the deal with the Bakers for Upchurch And Seng notarized:)

I certainly hope it isnt business as usual Mr. Alvitre. Innocent people beware. Conclusion of trial will show what is true.

I certainly hope it isnt business as usual Mr. Alvitre. Innocent people beware. Conclusion of trial will show what is true.

I certainly hope it isnt business as usual Mr. Alvitre. Innocent people beware. Conclusion of trial will show what is true.

I certainly hope it isnt business as usual Mr. Alvitre. Innocent people beware. Conclusion of trial will show what is true.

Your knack for doing 'great business' is a joke. We've recently learned that your wife left you. Is that because she found out the truth about you Mr. Alvitre? Fake, phoney, and liar.

I have no problem answering a legitimate claim of suspected or alleged wrongdoing but this laundry list of mud slinging on my personal life (which is not a factor here nor is it open for discussion) is both speculatory and assumptively ridiculous. Read through my previous posts. If you have anything of substance to bring forth, bring it. Otherwise, please either recant or backpedal out of the convo. I don't care that counsel has advised me not to respond here. The fact is that I have nothing to hide and have no problem addressing anything about my professional life. When the dust settles, it will be business as usual for me after the fact. I can't say that about the ex or others. The cards will fall where they may and the bottom-line is that not a paper trail nor money trail exist that tie me to the outlandish claims made by others of me, nor did any institutional mortgages exist that support the claims or associate any actions or monies to the claims either. I can elaborate more, but the bottom-line is that I will prevail. You want me to respond? Bring something that is organized and condensed with substance or no response from me. Andrew

heres what I wanna know? Are all of them still working together? It was posted that Andrew filed a restraining order against Linda and her current husband for harrassing at that time his girlfriend. Its my belief Andrew and Seng were business partners and still are. linda and her current husband have nothing associated with those two since since the restraining order aint that true? star47, kierstan, richard etc etc stick with one name or justME. when Andrew called you from Family First did he call richard or kierstan? wasnt kierstan the same person who use to work with his girlfriend? why would he claim that the office was shut down over a year..google that. I doubt he did that. regardless of what activities that have done dont make things up as they come

Seng also has an MO, before he rips them off he also introduces them to his sister Lynda Steele, aka Lynda Plunk aka SengPeth Bounnharaj. That is how she got the last investors that she ripped off that are suing her! So if you see either one of these people RUN!

Read the first report Mike (Lynda). Those are facts. There are a lot more but you should never tell all you know. Have a great day! Oh by the way Mike in Dallas, nice city to visit ,never lived there GO COWBOYS! :):)

Interesting Kierstan. You were introduced to Andrew for a brief moment, got his name last name ALL of which you needed to pull him on the internet? Thats quite amazing. I found that for me to find him in the site specifically I had to type in first name middle intial that last name, thats for THIS rip off report. So he introduced himself as hi, Im Andrew J Alvitre. This is the spelling of my name. A- L-V-I-T-R-E. This is NOT a common name Keirstan. This is not d**k Sally Jesse or Harry Jones Smith or Johnson. Business associates cant pronounce the name let alone spell it. But you did it. Theres nothing wrong with Andrew. He was framed by Lynda and her friends. Andrews not the father of the children neither. He knows it and will keep it quiet. He's sterile. Don't ever talk bad about him again. When he becomes single again can someone post it? Let me show you how a real man needs to be treated. NOW THATS A REAL MAN, ANDREW ALVITRE

I don't know any of you!!!!! This is Rip off report by CONSUMERS or INDIVIDUALS who were ripped off by them. Not some third party whose surfing the net in search of their lost love and friends of their girlfriends yada yada yada. This site was created to help consumers be aware of companies they are dealing with. Customers are bias, therfore a forum or rebuttal are implemented. Stick to the actual reason why it started with Star47. OBVIOUSLY this person wants to report the lawsuit in process. Your way of reporting is absolute ludicrious. Anyone searching to read this article is a moron trusting your actual facts. Find FACTS submit it. Rip off report feeds on the others that loves misery. SHAME ON ALL OF YOU!! Star47 its apparent you don't have a life, search back on dates of your responses, you live on this site. No one cares about anyones personal confilcts. Anyone in a relationship knows there's 2 sides to everything. Make your own judgement if you know these people on a personal level. Don't abuse this site for childish reportings. Find other ways to reply to public forum. It's meant to REPORT FACTS!! Find your one sided tape recorded then listen to it AGAIN and AGAIN. When complete put yourself to bed. Good grief bunch of wackos

You are being told what to say by Lynda. Or are Lynda because some things only she would know! :) Check your grammar. As for investors, they were shown smoke and mirrors, and were stolen from. Like Mark Hill. The truth will come out, and there is so much more that you don't know. So really it comes down to not just a person defaulting on promissory notes. All that money had to go somewhere and it sure wasn't to the people she took it from. So where did it go? As for being damaged, not in the least. One side recorded conversations can be very helpful when the other party has lied, it gives clarity when the words are spoken from the other party Have you ever heard of criminal charges being filed and being investigated? Sometimes civil comes before criminal. And there are other entities besides a DA who might be interested in these dealings. Life goes on, have a good one! And why trash Mr. Alvitre's GF? She has absolutely nothing to do with Lynda and Andrew's misdeeds.

We got together in this to see if we can help possibly personally or professionally. Between the six of us there's an answer somewhere. Kierstan we're sorry to hear about your friend. It's contradicting what you said though. At first you said she seems like a lovley lady, Andrew's girlfriend like you don't know her. Afterwards you simply started to talk about her out of nowhere from the wood works. What is it? Are you asking for yourself? Are you the girlfriend disguised with an AKA. It's ok to fear a new relationship. Itsn't it too soon for you to be involved in a relationship with a guy that just left his ex of 10 years and their 3 kids? If you aren't his girlfriend, we don't know how you can convince Pamela to leave Andrew. These are indeed true statements of what happened to Lynda and Andrew. Some of us were there when it happened so we lived through it with them. You know they weren't married legally; we found this out later working with them. Lynda never agreed to marry andrew. She left Andrew many years ago back to Chicago when she was pregnant with the 3 child. Their children are very young, 11 months apart, they were part of the mortgage co. He followed her to Chicago with her money that was the fight too. Linda (the loan processor) tells us Lynda Steele left her debit card thats how he got to chicago with the help from his old room mate. They were only together short period she already didnt want to be with the guy. eventually she came back. His mother lived with them, lynda paid Andrews mother to care for the children while she lived in their home. When his mom left, she bought a home for her parents to live in to come here and care for the children. They lived down the street from the office. She and her investor friend bought it. What we know is andrew didnt pay for the house. She got tired of the business always arguing at work. She also financed a home for others that couldn't get financing because of bad credit. Lynda would offer her credit card ratings then put them on her cards to help them establish credit. She helped Linda P leave her abusive husband gave her money to get back to California. We worked for Andrew, sometimes we would get paid late, Lynda always wrote us a check if he couldnt pay us on time. Lynda wasnt so nice to everyone either. Shes mean to many borrowers too. It's a give and take. The filing of the lawsuit we're convinced was a poor judgment on her part. What we would like to say to the investors is, you knew what you were getting yourself into. She didn't embezzel or con for the money, every investor knew her. They didn't have a problem wiring her the funds. Don't just blame her blame yourself too. Bad choices were made on all parts. We all want to get into something good once we hear about it. Kierstan when you talk to your friend make sure Andrew and her don't have any kids together theres gonna be alot of child support for him to pay. Right now the kids are living full time with lynda but andrew doesn't contribute anything to the children. Lynda and john are caring for the children. We spoke to kids he doesn't pay any mind to them now. Nothings changed, at the mortgage company he didn't care so much for them then while Lynda paid for all the child care then hired Ladeana as a nanny. Lets make sure you understand, Lynda paid for all childcare. Andrew was only concerned with his job at the mortgage company. Lynda left him several times because hes cared for himself only. We can give him some credit for taking himself to Arizona to be with his family. Heather and Ladeana knew this wouldnt last. He asked for the 2nd child, she flew her out there then Andrew came back to get the other children. We knew at the office she wasnt going to Arizona. She flew out to see them couiple of times then he came back here. Eventually Andrew came back to Lynda with the children. He lived with her new husband for several months. When we spoke to Lynda last, Andrew started with some mess with john and with her, she kicked him out in June. When Lynda found out his new girlfriend was still married and Andrew was getting engaged with her she went balistic considering he didn't know her that well. John knew Pam's soon to be ex-husband. The restraining order came since lynda hired a PI to find out everything personally about andrews new girlfriend. She loves her children. We love her children. She also told ladeana awhile back if anything happened to her, make sure her children are cared for DON'T let Andrew have the kids. Find everything out about the step mother. ladeana offered to take the children. They are very close. Of course he doesn't want Lynda to meet her girlfriend or vice versa. But lynda got andrew to meet her ex-boyfriends and fiancee, shes got nothing to hide. We met her exes too. When he got kicked out of John and Lyndas house, he moved in with Lyndas parents. It's no wonder he rushed in being with this woman. when we talked to lynda this week we found he married your friend last weekend. Didn't your friend just got a divorce told by jesse on this forum? Are they both co-dependent? We'll talk about their professional work later.

News travel fast from Fayetteville to Idaho then to Cali then back to NC Kierstan, go to public records, read up on Lynda Steele and Andrew Alvitre, READ is the emphasis. I used to work with them, NOT all allegations are correct. Internet posting is NOT 100% accurate either. I followed this suit from the VERY beginning. Cj Good, star47 is John Browns girlfriend. John Brown is the main plaintiff who started the whole case. It was dismissed back in 2007, as I recalled. CJ Good is a trashy manipulative outsider who wants to feel important. Google CJ Good. I found she started with all the FFMC staff members to include the VP of operations. Shes the same individual that emailed Ladeana. They have whats called a civil summons, its NOT a criminal suit. From what I know about the law, call any attorney to verify this, this case cannot be brought up by the DA; its a CIVIL SUIT. I personally know the plaintiffs with the exception to one. Then again, their daughter was a real estate agent that closed loans with the mortgage company. Its a fact. Lynda Steele DEFAULTED on her promissory notes, so do alot of people. READ THE PAPER, WATCH THE NEWS, our economy is in a recession. I also know she made tremendous amount of money for her investors and lost tremendous amount for herself and others. Andrew and Lynda also helped NUMEROUS people with their homes which other mortgage companies cannot. I was also the witness to countless luncheon with investors whom WILLINGLY endorses checks over to her without her asking because of her knowledge in real estate flipping. You can read all sort of things about people, take it at face value OR you need to know them yourself. There are employees she treated like family. Whats done is done. Everyone makes mistakes they are not proud of. I know I made my share and still do. Its suggested she's a sociopath, well so is Bill Clinton and we love and admire him. To Jesse, yes you are right Lynda doesnt drink, I've known her for several years and Andrew's assistant Ladeana their nanny just agreed and confirmed with me. If Lynda wrote worthless checks, we only hope it was to John Brown. Andrew, man I heard you married this lady recently. Lets hope for the sake of the children since I do care about your family and the kids, you accepted her hand in marriage that this will be her 4th and finally marriage. Your children with Lynda should come first, even before your wife. Kierstan, its too late they are man and wife already. Anyhow congrats. CJ, do you care so much about the recorded conversations with one sided person? what do you care so much damaging other people. go seek GOD and prayer. You're so damaged you've allowed for this case to affect your life. Do you think your chasing a fugitive and wants the world to know about these two individuals? Only small minded people are easily manipulated by outside resources. A wise person told me this, I took her advice. She still does have the biggest heart east of Mississippi. Good luck to all of you in NC!

News travel fast from Fayetteville to Idaho then to Cali then back to NC Kierstan, go to public records, read up on Lynda Steele and Andrew Alvitre, READ is the emphasis. I used to work with them, NOT all allegations are correct. Internet posting is NOT 100% accurate either. I followed this suit from the VERY beginning. Cj Good, star47 is John Browns girlfriend. John Brown is the main plaintiff who started the whole case. It was dismissed back in 2007, as I recalled. CJ Good is a trashy manipulative outsider who wants to feel important. Google CJ Good. I found she started with all the FFMC staff members to include the VP of operations. Shes the same individual that emailed Ladeana. They have whats called a civil summons, its NOT a criminal suit. From what I know about the law, call any attorney to verify this, this case cannot be brought up by the DA; its a CIVIL SUIT. I personally know the plaintiffs with the exception to one. Then again, their daughter was a real estate agent that closed loans with the mortgage company. Its a fact. Lynda Steele DEFAULTED on her promissory notes, so do alot of people. READ THE PAPER, WATCH THE NEWS, our economy is in a recession. I also know she made tremendous amount of money for her investors and lost tremendous amount for herself and others. Andrew and Lynda also helped NUMEROUS people with their homes which other mortgage companies cannot. I was also the witness to countless luncheon with investors whom WILLINGLY endorses checks over to her without her asking because of her knowledge in real estate flipping. You can read all sort of things about people, take it at face value OR you need to know them yourself. There are employees she treated like family. Whats done is done. Everyone makes mistakes they are not proud of. I know I made my share and still do. Its suggested she's a sociopath, well so is Bill Clinton and we love and admire him. To Jesse, yes you are right Lynda doesnt drink, I've known her for several years and Andrew's assistant Ladeana their nanny just agreed and confirmed with me. If Lynda wrote worthless checks, we only hope it was to John Brown. Andrew, man I heard you married this lady recently. Lets hope for the sake of the children since I do care about your family and the kids, you accepted her hand in marriage that this will be her 4th and finally marriage. Your children with Lynda should come first, even before your wife. Kierstan, its too late they are man and wife already. Anyhow congrats. CJ, do you care so much about the recorded conversations with one sided person? what do you care so much damaging other people. go seek GOD and prayer. You're so damaged you've allowed for this case to affect your life. Do you think your chasing a fugitive and wants the world to know about these two individuals? Only small minded people are easily manipulated by outside resources. A wise person told me this, I took her advice. She still does have the biggest heart east of Mississippi. Good luck to all of you in NC!

Can be found in public records. Mr. Alvitre is involved in a lawsuit that includes charges of fraud as is Ms. Steele Plunk. In North Carolina did you know a person can record conversations without telling the other person? As to Mr. Alvitre's personal life that is none of my business and the lady he is dating has to make a decision for herself whether as to be with him or not. If you know women and relationships then you know there is nothing you could tell her that she will listen to since she in love with him.

How would you know if Lynda drinks or not? A report against her for worthless checks shows a high blood level for alcohol and for the threatening phone calls she made also.

How would you know if Lynda drinks or not? A report against her for worthless checks shows a high blood level for alcohol and for the threatening phone calls she made also.

How would you know if Lynda drinks or not? A report against her for worthless checks shows a high blood level for alcohol and for the threatening phone calls she made also.

How would you know if Lynda drinks or not? A report against her for worthless checks shows a high blood level for alcohol and for the threatening phone calls she made also.

Andrew Alvitre Why make these attacks? Fayetteville North Carolina I am neutral in all of what is being discussed, but I am aware of who the girlfriend is. I used to work with her and I can tell you, she does not take advantage of military men. She has had a very bad battle with cancer on mulitple occasions and has recently been selfless enough to take on the responsibility of raising a family member. So in addition to her own health issues she is having to care for a child. Please do not attack someone you do not know based on information that you look up on reports. Yes she has been married 3x, so what? If that's the worst she's done.... To my knowledge she knows nothing about real estate. I think Andrew was looking for someone he could "pull the wool" on, so to speak. I hope for her sake that she isn't getting caught up in something that will cause her more grief. I met Andrew once when he came in to see her, and I just got a really creepy vibe from that man. That is why I got online to see if I could find out anything about him. I read that you said that Andrew lived with Lynda (assuming this is his ex?) and took advantage, and I fear that he may be trying that with his girlfriend as well. Everything you said he's done with Lynda in the past I see coming the new woman's way. He has only told her things that would paint a bad picture of his ex, claiming that he has no involvement in financial wrongs. She only knows what Andrew has told her, so if you have ANY information that would help her friends convince her to leave this man, please pass it along! As far as the restraining order against his ex, I heard her say to a mutual friend that Andrew was behind that because he didn't want the two of them to meet in person. ??? Kierstan Fayetteville, North Carolina

Andrew Alvitre Why make these attacks? Fayetteville North Carolina I am neutral in all of what is being discussed, but I am aware of who the girlfriend is. I used to work with her and I can tell you, she does not take advantage of military men. She has had a very bad battle with cancer on mulitple occasions and has recently been selfless enough to take on the responsibility of raising a family member. So in addition to her own health issues she is having to care for a child. Please do not attack someone you do not know based on information that you look up on reports. Yes she has been married 3x, so what? If that's the worst she's done.... To my knowledge she knows nothing about real estate. I think Andrew was looking for someone he could "pull the wool" on, so to speak. I hope for her sake that she isn't getting caught up in something that will cause her more grief. I met Andrew once when he came in to see her, and I just got a really creepy vibe from that man. That is why I got online to see if I could find out anything about him. I read that you said that Andrew lived with Lynda (assuming this is his ex?) and took advantage, and I fear that he may be trying that with his girlfriend as well. Everything you said he's done with Lynda in the past I see coming the new woman's way. He has only told her things that would paint a bad picture of his ex, claiming that he has no involvement in financial wrongs. She only knows what Andrew has told her, so if you have ANY information that would help her friends convince her to leave this man, please pass it along! As far as the restraining order against his ex, I heard her say to a mutual friend that Andrew was behind that because he didn't want the two of them to meet in person. ??? Kierstan Fayetteville, North Carolina

Andrew Alvitre Why make these attacks? Fayetteville North Carolina I am neutral in all of what is being discussed, but I am aware of who the girlfriend is. I used to work with her and I can tell you, she does not take advantage of military men. She has had a very bad battle with cancer on mulitple occasions and has recently been selfless enough to take on the responsibility of raising a family member. So in addition to her own health issues she is having to care for a child. Please do not attack someone you do not know based on information that you look up on reports. Yes she has been married 3x, so what? If that's the worst she's done.... To my knowledge she knows nothing about real estate. I think Andrew was looking for someone he could "pull the wool" on, so to speak. I hope for her sake that she isn't getting caught up in something that will cause her more grief. I met Andrew once when he came in to see her, and I just got a really creepy vibe from that man. That is why I got online to see if I could find out anything about him. I read that you said that Andrew lived with Lynda (assuming this is his ex?) and took advantage, and I fear that he may be trying that with his girlfriend as well. Everything you said he's done with Lynda in the past I see coming the new woman's way. He has only told her things that would paint a bad picture of his ex, claiming that he has no involvement in financial wrongs. She only knows what Andrew has told her, so if you have ANY information that would help her friends convince her to leave this man, please pass it along! As far as the restraining order against his ex, I heard her say to a mutual friend that Andrew was behind that because he didn't want the two of them to meet in person. ??? Kierstan Fayetteville, North Carolina

we came across background check for andrew jacob alvitre yesterday found he was caught in the act of drinking and driving, made some calls then verified the validity of criminal back ground check what others can we found out on you mr alvitre? doesnt that effect your licensure its to be reported to NCCOB for any type of filing? you above the law? lyndas got the known public records are you guilty by association in this too? does lynda steele drink to get a dui? we found out she doesnt drink at all

*First of all I have paid creditors on debts owed from operating my previous mortgage firm and am steadily making headway. I have/will communicate my plan openly with them and will pay them accordingly so in that respect, do not worry. I alone stand for the debt associated with Family First Mortgage operational debt that I personally stood for. Secondly... I don't know who you are, nor do I know what alias you are using because you do not authenticate yourself. The bottomline is that you know an investigation does NOT exist with my regulator and your cards were called on that matter. I stand by anything I have done and said as straight up. You may perpetrate and allege differently, but cannot provide your bonafide proof because it simply doesn't exist. This is my last communication on this thread concerning this matter. I simply will not enlist the time to respond to blanket accusations and unfounded claims against me. Here are your options of what you can do to enlist my response: 1) Serve me. 2) Authenticate yourself to me with bonafide identification and then get real specific in terms of what you are alleging. If you cannot, nor will not do either of the 2 items above you simply are an antagonizer and antagonizers are ignored moving forward. Goodbye, Andrew

BILLS ARE RACKING UP FROM COLLECTIONS ACCOUNTS. ANY PLANS ON GETTING CAUGHT UP?

Its true my friends and me were eating at Red lobster yesterday when an interesting topic come up about the mortgage industry. Mr Alvitre I've identify myself with my correct name. Im also friends and colleagues of the individuals that are suing you with lynda steele and other firms. Ive spoken to many others about your past ones that worked closer with you at the family first branch and ones working down in florida. some ex employees from years and years ago. they dont like you very much due to the distasteful nature of not wanting to pay them on time on payroll. Heres a history on lynda steele and andrew alvitre per past employess and the nanny that watched their children. lets hear his rebuttal on this: andrew and lynda met at a very young age of early 20s. lynda was marrried to mr steele who was an army officer. they met at a mortgage company. while working together they liked one another alot. Andrew moves himself into her house then his room mate came along. while living there, lynda told many people andrew lived rent free leaving her to make the mortgage payment on her own. he was fired from the lending store where they worked together, she quit the place. she opens up a mortgage company from her house when andrew went back to the lending store a second time. andrews first home according to public information went into preclosure but was later sold to a family member. lyndas mom buys the house where they operated their mortgage company for some time. the building belongs to lynda and her family. we later find that she buys various homes with other investors where they house the family. tax records also shows she purchases homes on her own without andrew. andrew said at the beginning of the report hes never had a home go into foreclosure, we can suspect lynda did most of the purchases. he said they didnt get married for personal reasons. we speculate that she didnt want to share anything with him because she did most of it on her own. if the readers have met lynda steele shes a person with big ego. this lady is independent that where she got in alot of trouble is her ego. she ran an investment company in the same building call jp & associates. no one knew what it did so much except that when andrew needed money or when the employees needed money she had it available. she closed some loans then she left and did her own thing thats when she got in over her head according to the nanny assistant. andrew couldnt do much without asking lynda for help. he says hes guilty by association. hes right he is guilty too. who would believe that this man ran only the mortgage side of the business in a building thats 1500 square feet big but doesnt know what she does with her investors. we know he help her spend the money living it up also. andrew plays stupid as much as lynda plays on her investors. he turns the other way. this is a couple that would be common law man and wife they have 3 kids together ran companies together and he doesnt know? we know hes letting her take the fall. thats why he supported her in the beginning of the report then lynda must got ugly with him and his girlfriend and the girlfriend says let lynda take all the blame. someone tell me how you cant know what goes on in your life with someone you work with for 10 some years? ive spoken to females that are still in contact with her. shes remorseful for every invest but i dont see how mr alvitre says his name his impeccable? you owe bill collectors alot of money mr alvitre. are you conning this new lady for a free place to live too? we know your both in on it together. shes the one that acts on with investors, youre the quiet and doesnt know anything partner. she gets in trouble you defend her then she gets married you find a woman that'll take care of you, while she does the same. when you ran out of money you gotta find someone else to front it. she marrys a guy teaches him some about real estate investing, you find someone thats got a place to live. you probably cant convince her so much to do get investors knows nil from what we know of this woman. what we do know is she scams military men of health benefits. you 3 got it all planned. was the restraining order even real or was it a ploy? we spoke to ledena she says lynda just got married and you lived with them. whats the real story?? taking hundreds of thousands of dollars must run in the family? sister in az got arrested? NOT GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION?

First of all Jesse (or whatever alias you are), I have no idea who you are and have never met you. You probably will never positively identify yourself and for all I know are one of either two people I suspect. However, that is irrelevant at this stage. Secondly, my personal business is simply that: personal and private. Keep your attacks above the belt. Then again, this forum will allow any "Tom, d**k or Sally" to trash talk anyone for any reason without requiring proof and the integrity of the forum is questionable. I owe you nor anyone an explanation on my personal life and am truly blessed and lucky to have her in my life. Lastly, I managed our mortgage firm only. I was not responsible for Lynda and her notary (of which she lost as well as her loan officer license), nor was I responsible for her tax business (hers solely and I am ignorant to IRS tax code), nor was I a member of her company (she alone was member/manager) that was involved in the problems she has willfully admitted too. I have no problem giving credit where it is and is not due and this instance is no different. I am guilty by association of Lynda's unfortunate predicament and dealings only. What say you now?

whoever thinks Mr. Alvitres scamming this woman hes with is so far from the truth. Rumors have it these good people are together, has been if you read the police report commenting on the order against his ex. Mr Alvitre file an order against his ex and her new husband for harrassing his new girlfriend. what we know of this, hes not scamming her, shes scamming him too. we went to the court house to find out about him then her, she got divored not too long ago from her 3rd husband. this lady is 30 years old. she SEEMS lovely. dont feel so bad for any of them. I read all the comments on this page about these people, Mr Alvitre denies hes involve in any of Ms Steeles doings. so ms steele is the guilty one. hes got his good name slandered he says. if they ran the companies together how is he not guilty too? did ms steele take the fall when mr alvitre tried to play the good guy, has anyone thought of that?

The perpetrators of these allegations are speculating. The charges alleged will not stick because evidence never did exist (no smoking gun or paper trail exists) to support the allegations for me as a defendant nor my former employer as defendant. The main defendant has already admitted to defaulting on agreements on the civil matter. It is that simple. However, the plaintiffs in the case have hired a PI of whom is doing nothing more than antagonizing the situation in a futile attempt to garner information for the support of their efforts. I am responding here because I value my good name and reputation and would feel remiss not addressing these outlandish claims leaving them here unchallenged. Anyone can pop off with accusations or allegations and I am left to either leave the garbage/inaccurate report alone or respond directly to the claim such as I am yours now. Why would you be sorry for another woman I am involved with on a personal note and who are you to formulate an opinion on the matter? How is that even relevant? What next, are you going to bring children into the picture? I have never heard of you nor do I know who you are. Who are you suggesting I scammed in the first place? You are ignorant and premature with your perpetrated allegation. I suppose you will not positively identify yourself for this public forum nor to me either as you would be served for slander. What is my troubled past you claim to know of? The fact is that my name and reputation are impeccable (with exception to this complaint I am wrongfully defendant of and will eventually be vindicated of) and my licensure with NC state is in good standing with no pending investigations per our state regulator staff Attorney David Worth as of 9/4. What say you now? Andrew

Star47, nice try. I am not going to violate Mr. Hills privacy by disclosing his personal information. The bottom-line is that I always was compliance sensitive with all mortgage financing provided and operated in a legal and ethical capacity while serving Mark. If he has a concern in any capacity, please have him direct that concern to me at my earlier supplied address. I'm happy to help out and provide "tangible net benefits" to him regardless of his situation or circumstance. Andrew

Is Mr. Alvitre guilty of any of these allegations/charges? Or are these things speculation? I've read that the situation is up on legal charges, but when will the charges take place? I know he is with another woman and I feel sorry for her if all that I am reading is correct. She seems to be a lovely lady and I would hate for her to be affected by all of Mr. Alvitre's troubled past. Is he still in the mortgage business?

Mr. Alvitre, Can you tell me about the properties you were involved with with a person named Mark Hill of Fayetteville, NC? Was that a win-win situation? I have spoken with Mr. Hill.

To whom it may concern: Inspite of the noise and chaos associated with Lynda and challenges instigated by her, I want to mention that I do not know the complainants, nor are the comments or alleged complaints regulated here. Anyone can come here to file a complaint against anyone for whatever reason and pop off with allegations regardless of how elaborate they are while leaving the individual complained against to publicly address the matter for the sake of retaining some semblance of damage control on the character assassination and attack. I value my good name and reputation such that I would feel remiss by not responding and giving credit or credence where it is due or not as I understand it and against counsel's advice, I have decided to respond anyways. The complaining individuals "are not" authenticated as true and correct individuals as they claim. For all I know, one or more of the complainants here (for this reason) could be the same person and one is only left to speculate on the matter. I have my suspicions of who the individuals are and true motivations for the shenanigans but that is really immaterial at this point. Here is the bottom line concerning my official license status in regards to my professional mortgage licensure: My licensure status is in good standing with NO pending investigations of my status and no enforcement actions pending against me. WHO is my source??? My source is: Attorney David Worth as of September 4th at 115pm and he is the Staff Attorney of the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks of whom regulates the Mortgage industry for North Carolina. Andrew Alvitre Mortgage Banker/Broker: Certified Residential Mortgage Specialist

Whoever posted as Star 47 for that rebuttal comment, for one you need to check your spelling and grammar and two I would like to know how you tampered with the site in order to use my (the author of this report) screen name? I have reported this to the Ripoff report staff.

Hi "Shemeka" What you have said about CJ working at the hotel is true but what is not true is that CJ states she is a private investigator and that she causes problems. And oh yeah no one named Shemeka worked at the hotel.

Joann, I don't know who you are associated with or representing (even with an alias) but you are obviously desperate to attempt a public fishing expedition and personal attacks against me both personally and professionally. I have never caused personal harm to anyone and have always been an advocate of my clientele. Regardless though, I will address the questions you posed that are of a public nature. why dont you share with us some of the questions you failed to answer in the previous discussion. 1. you say you didnt sign any promissory note? did ms steele act on these alone? * Please defer to the law suit and discovery process and/or advise your employer of such. 2. why do you support her in your answers after you filed a restraining order against them? * I have personal disputes with Lynda. I will not fabricate concocted and inaccurate garbage or misinformation on anyone regardless of whether or not I have personal strife with them. What is right is right. 3. why all of sudden dissolve your company after you were served the summons. ms steeles llc is still open? * I dissolved one company of 2 that I currently own through NC Sec. of State. 4. why did ansen group move from the hotel? * Ansen Group was never physically in the hotel. A decision was made not to lease there. 5. why do you live with her parents, we know her parents reside in that property in hope mills in lake up church. *NA 6. why is her brother your partner, yet the office employee says you never got along with him when you and linda were together? NA 7. hes your notary public, why is that? *I have no notary publics I use specifically and have used multiple notary publics over the years and within the past year for personal and professional business purposes. 8.why did ms steele never marry you legally but some deeds say it is? *I never married Lynda. One of her partners assumed that. 9.you personally never got any homes foreclosed on, we found you didnt own but 2 homes abd it also is co-owned by someone else. Could it be you couldnt buy any homes? how does a mortgage broker give advice on home purchases, yet he shouldnt be giving out advices and doesnt know how to do his own purchase. must be true, relied on a female to take care of him. * I have owned 1 property solely some years ago here that I sold and 2 more recently were co-owned. Your opinion is na here. I have helped thousands of people obtain home ownership in a copasetic fashion and my competency as a licensed loan officer is not in question. I do not rely on anyone to take care of me and never have. 10.were you fired from sloan mortgage? * I did not leave under less than honorable terms and elaboration of the circumstances is none of your business. Joann, please email or text me your full name and address so that my counselor can 1) summon you if/when necessary for court and 2) provide you a cease and desist committing slander against me action. If you are "woman" enough you will do that. Thanks, Andrew

Joann, I will not respond to your personal attacks. Andrew

why dont you share with us some of the questions you failed to answer in the previous discussion. 1. you say you didnt sign any promissory note? did ms steele act on these alone? 2. why do you support her in your answers after you filed a restraining order against them? 3. why all of sudden dissolve your company after you were served the summons. ms steeles llc is still open? 4. why did ansen group move from the hotel? 5. why do you live with her parents, we know her parents reside in that property in hope mills in lake up church. 6. why is her brother your partner, yet the office employee says you never got along with him when you and linda were together? 7. hes your notary public, why is that? 8.why did ms steele never marry you legally but some deeds say it is? 9.you personally never got any homes foreclosed on, we found you didnt own but 2 homes abd it also is co-owned by someone else. Could it be you couldnt buy any homes? how does a mortgage broker give advice on home purchases, yet he shouldnt be giving out advices and doesnt know how to do his own purchase. must be true, relied on a female to take care of him. 10.were you fired from sloan mortgage? stick to answering the questions for the public.

pardon me but i think you mistaken me for the wrong person. like all men you dont pay attention to anything. i wrote, i INTERVIEWED with you, i didnt work for you dumb fellow!!! you got yourself all wrap up in the long winded story you missed what i wrote. now going back to not answering my family member as part of your business adventures, he was a what someone in the long line of your ex's family i would guess? how many loans did you close at your company? from what everybody that worked with you, Ms Steele made most of the money and took care of you, guess that could be why she had to get investors money and work towards making more. from what i gathered shes a pretty intelligent woman. i use to see you all the time at the real estate luncheons awhile back yet i couldnt shake the fact you are so selfish. you talking like you got a harvard education, yet so dumb taking online classes like kelly says, and never will amount to anything. hows the online education coming anyway? still working on that associates degree? the last testimony you typed says its none of my business to know your personal life, every body in america knows your business, its call the internet fellow. you exposed each and everybody. was it true, mr plunk threatened you? what could have happened with you and her husband that made you ran to the police station to file a report? are they still bothering you? is ms steele plunk jealous of your girlfriend, is that what you put down on the report. i heard she can be of a mean woman to you. but the employees of your company says she was the one who was in control, cuz youre a p****y. that must hurt. so star47 was the lucky one who saw your new catch. a red head eh? does this one wear any pants? is ms steel going to reply to this then catch up with some times. with her involvement the replies might get exciting. when she comes on i have a few words to say to her not as bad as yours. i like ms steele, shes got men by the b**lls, to mention you especially. i was married to a creep like you yet happy to know youre getting whats yours. its gotta bad with you and the ex, hows the children? so wel mannered says ladina although jason says linda took care of them most of the time. where are you these days, working uncover somewhere?

Joann, I apologize and do not recall your employment and if you were employed it wasn't very lengthy. In either case, I am lead to believe you harbor some type of negative feeling over the matter but seem to recall that if you were employed we left with no open ended items outstanding. It must have been some time ago and I am sorry to see such deeply harbored feelings over all this time... Regarding the matter with the labor board, it really is not your business but I will simply state that the matter was resolved in the favor of myself and the firm I was Branch Manager of. Brenda was paid 100% of what she was owed, I saw to that personally. Be specific concerning problems you are suggesting I am dealing with. I will not talk about my personal matters with a stranger, it is of no consequence to you and is none of your business. We will agree to disagree on your opinions and my personal life is of no consequence to you also and I accept the fact that you seem to believe that I owe you personally an explanation or that I have somehow ruffled your feathers. Joann Brewser (supposedly from Florida that emailed me while on a fishing expedition earlier or are you an alias from CJ Good?) if that is your real name, you do not know me personally nor have you had interaction with me extensively and therefore you would not be a viable witness in any capacity. Anything pertaining to Miss Steele's (now Plunk) actions she will address directly with the appropriate sources. I will and can not answer on anyone's behalf. Andrew

thanks so very much for addressing your long winded story. i interviewed with you back in 04, white woman, wanted to work as a loan processor. you got rid of me like i didnt know any better cause youre so d**n smart. i kinda knew one day i would find you in some sort of mess. i became friends with your assistant ladina then go intouch with jason spencer. ladina loves to give out information. you ran into some trouble with the labor board with kelly. and that brenda woman who you didnt want to pay. i know the problems you got into, Mr. alvitre. i work part time with investigating offices, you my friend are not a very nice man. who files a restraining order against their own family but talks nice about them later. you made the list of americas dummest people. how do you sleep at night? where do you sleep? oh i know, i read the order quite hilarious. what christian mission were you on? what church do you attend, can we go there and picket the church? what female would be with you youre like so serious and stiff. i'll be a part of the suit as a witness to testify youre a creep with no heart. what happened to the million dollars, did ms steele spend it all? ansen group sounds like a company you opened up with a family member? why did you move from hotel?

CJ Good, For the sake of addressing your concerns, I will address them here. However, please allow me to also state that your attempts to defame my character and "character assasinate" are futile attempts indicative of someone mudslinging and tearing down another and your actions do not demonstrate professionalism even be it through the seemingly difficult circumstances. I answer for my own actions alone and do not blame shift or "character assasinate and attack" and cannot answer on behalf of someone else. The mere fact that you have demonstrated "scarcity mentality," excessive critique and the "low ground" in the situation is a problem that only you, your maker, your psychologist (mentor/counselor) and your employer ought to address. I pray you succeed in gaining healthy perspective and are able to put this matter you have wholeheartedly committed yourself too with the appropriate parties, i.e., legal counsel for resolution. I also want to be clear that I will not attack any party and will defer to the appropriate process involved with peaceful resolution. I will also not address matters that are irrelevant with those I have deemed not quantified to provide me guidance. The matter of the restraining order has been dismissed and that too is of no particular concern to you as it involves a personal matter. I will not address your flippant and hostile attacks and assumptive stances and mud slinging on the matter of race. I have opened 2 entities in the past year that have had zero transactions with the public. Ansen Group, LLC never really got off the ground and I decided to dissolve the organization for various professional reasons that are not applicable to this discussion. However, I did not transact any business with the organization as you so slanderly suggest and have operated within the scope of legal, ethical and moral high standards in this capacity. CJ Good (if that is your alias or real name?); I say again, please defer to the proper authorities. You bring shame upon your actions, your name and your employers and I will not resort to improper instigation to participate in the fiasco you endorse as your protocol or "modus operandi" as it does not result in resolution and only antagonizes the matter. If you agree to disagree that is fine too, however, defer to the appropriate legal resolution process as this dialogue is being documented and will forward to appropriate counsel. Have a great week, Andrew PS: Let's keep your dialogue and your punches "above vs. below" the belt.

Joann, I'm not sure what role you play in the civil dispute. The response I sent (long winded or not) addressed the comments referenced by CJ Good (Star47) and were to set the stage right. I encourage you to defer to the suit that will either go to court or settle out depending on how things pan out regarding the Plunk family and that is purely up to them and their counsel. Why don't you be a little specific vs. making blanket statements alleging my defrauding the public and take the higher ground vs. your resorting to mudslinging tactics that are nothing more than malicious personal attacks? Please address this and reference your full name and address and/or counsel when you slander me so that I can specify how/when to serve you via our counsel. I did file a restraining order on a very personal matter against Lynda and John and your point is? I will not address personal matters publically. Andrew

Hi, I'm looking to tell what I know is going on at the Hotel Prince Charles Fayetteville, NC where I worked as a desk clerk. I heard the name Lynda Steele ever since this lady CJ got hired there and all of us girls wanted to search her name in the internet and under Andrew Alvitre. We finally found it and we read eveything CJ said and told everybody at the hotel. This lady got hired and worked very closely with Mr. Jimmy the hotel manager. The hotel manager is a stupid man to work for. when we worked there, he said the sheriff came to the hotel to arrest ms steele because she was a criminal and took the sheriff to the 2nd floor looking for her. we later found out he told everyone even the people at the coffee place that her parents were criminals and are currently in jail. we dont know why Cj works at the hotel. she tells everyone she is a private investigator. she doesnt do anything at the hotel but gives people problems when they come. there is a room lynda rented in the front to open her purse store. CJ told everyone she sold fake bags but we dont think the store never opened. we know she is a cause of peoples problem. the hotel manager and she lies to everybody and tells everyone about ms steele, we dont know why. if they are trying to run a business at the hotel, they are doing a very bad job of it. the hotel is filthy, the kitchen is disgusting. since i worked there they had 4 different managers cuz no one can keep their jobs. the place is out right diaster to work for. if the law is looking for her lynda why does Cj act like shes the law? does this woman have anything better to do? the hotel wont get any more business if she still works there. jimmy is just plain stupid and deserves to be fired. we hope many people read this and we want to go to the papers to tell others the hotel aint professional. i would sue the hotel especially jimmy for having a big mouth

Mr Alvitre, we never had the pleasure to meet. Youre from the 82nd? maybe the mortgage industry meltdown is a sign to go back in the service. and why not you would do ok there. hows ms steele these days? Thats right, RESTRAINING ORDER! did it say she was harrassing your girlfriend? is it that red head i saw at starbucks? you all still in hiding? youre mexican are you? shes chinese? was ansen group a FRAUD business. it wasnt in existence that long? is that another company that defrauded people out of their house? another house for 1.00. the notary that name sounds familiar. can u explain to the public how u can defend ms steele and her husband but u fear for your life? are u deceiving the public again?

Your rebuttal Mr. Andrew is very long winded. Your rebuttal is nice and precise, but we think its FRAUD. Nice touch with your paragraphs. Are you for or against your ex and her husband. Record shows your AGAINST. Youre defrauding the public. You'all he's FULL of it. He filed a restraining order against them both!!!

The last time I checked, Americans are innocent until proven guilty. The claims alleged by this user are inaccurate mud slinging and I'm only responding to this because the user has slandered me publically in an effort to retain my good name and reputation and demonstrate like Paul Harvey the radio reporter says: "the rest of the story." This posting has also been supplied to counsel and will result in legal remedy of slandering eventually through our states legal system and I will post results at a later time by citing cases closed, etc. The fact is that monies were loaned and/or invested with Lynda individually and she has never denied that. The amount lent/invested is grossly overstated and the # of actual investors involved is exaggerated unless you consider spouses of the investors. Lynda alone was initially in default and has never denied owing the monies; circumstances led to the default outside of the scope of her control. The parties involved are upset over that and sincerely want to be made whole and she has every intent of settling this unfortunate and very civil (as opposed to criminal) dispute. In one of the instances, I had personally signed a promissory note which was essentially a work out arrangement for one of Lynda's originally created transactions involving one of the plaintiffs. She initiated the original transaction with the investor, defaulted on the arrangement and then real estate collateral was provided. The collateral was subsequently foreclosed upon and the investor was provided opportunity to safeguard the collateral by curing the balance. I was not officially married to Lynda Steele (albeit through Laotian ceremony) for various personal reasons and the personal attacks I find to be are indicative of the lack of character of the alleged reporter. Why report false information that is not productive? Noone was misrepresented concerning the mortgage firm we functioned under for over 5 years. I did serve as Branch Manager and my business card, literature and materials and website all stated the title and not to mention my local website also referenced my title while pointing to the corporate owned site which clearly referenced our pecking order involving leadership, owners and all stakeholders. Branch Manager is not the same as Branch Owner, CEO, President, etc. Nothing was given in return by Lynda for her individual/entity arrangement regarding the investors? This is a ludicrous statement that is erroneous and inaccurate. Scammed someone out of a home for 1.00? The circumstances behind the conveyance were not known or reported by the perpetrator/reporter. The fact is that an arrangement was made involving the former homeowner and another individual by the name of Jonathon Plunk (he husband) and the former homeowner resides in the home currently. The transaction involved a refinance (as a non-owner occupied property) that took place by a Jonathon Plunk, Lynda's fiance at the time and involved the property being deeded to John and his subsequent refinance of the property through a local bank. Why? This is because the homeowner was divorced and because of her credit predicament, could not qualify for the refinance to release her ex from the mortgage loan and he wanted out so that he could untie his VA eligibility and buy a home in another state using his VA guaranty for the new home loan purchasee. The arrangement was above board in every capacity and the former homeowner will eventually qualify to buy the home back under the reasonable terms and arrangement involved. I was not a party to the specific terms of the agreement but wanted to put forth some due diligence to firm up specifics while not disclosing the homeowners name. However, it is public record. I was also advised that the private investigator entered the residence and startled the occupant unannounced and without prompting by the occupant while demanding information and proving to be somewhat belligerent per the occupant. The former homeowner is very grateful for Lynda and John's intervention and phoned them shortly after the trespassing transpired by the PI that goes by the name of CJ Good. Last year, the homeowner sent Mr. Plunk a Xmas card that displayed the genuine appreciation, love and affection for him and his assistance. The personal comments once again exhaust my impression of someone that is attempting to supposedly provide forthright information to the masses as accurate: I have not had one property I personally own go through foreclosure. True, Lynda has lost multiple properties outside of the properties she deeded to investor/s involved with her arrangements because her problem became a domino effect but she did not lose all properties. Never filing taxes is interesting considering that I personally receive a tax refund annually and am up to date for 07 and all previous years. Illegal aliens? That is a low blow and ludicrous. Do illegal aliens serve in the 82nd Airborne (in multiple countries) as Jumpmasters and 2nd generation paratroopers while departing honorably after 5 years of service? Did you serve star47? If that is your measuring stick then you need to find a new one with a better litmus test because I am a God fearing patriot. I have an active drivers license, do the PTA thing with my 3 beautiful children, coach soccer at the local church, participate in other sports locally, have a valid passport, am a full time college student, recently served selflessly on a Christian Mission Trip to Central America and love my country I am a native of and am proud of our great country. Lynda also served in the National Guard from what I understand honorably. My licensure is in good standing and I am one of less than 2 dozen professionals in our state in our industry with my certification. I have served for the past nearly 11 years in the mortgage industry with honor and have helped hundreds (I would argue potentially thousands) of families obtain homeownership. I have helped them become market savvy, have assisted them to get there financial house in order and the list of testimonies of families I have helped are deep and seemingly endless. I have participated in industry task forces to help dictate high standards mortgage professionals now adhere to. I now have 2nd generation referrals. I also provide anyone and everyone I assist in lending with what is referred to as a "tangible net benefit" which clearly means that if I can not prove that the financing they retain is responsible lending then I get the "smack down" by our regulators. However, I did that before it was professionally required of me to do so because that was the socially responsible thing to do. Under investigation? I welcome the investigation and will humbly flex my credibility muscle to weigh in and muscle up to ultimately demonstrate my proficiency and good deeds. I have not provided anyone with counsel that I regret ever and have always communicated the truth to someone regardless of financial gain and regardless of whether or not they wanted to hear it because they needed to know facts and not fluff when dealing with a "big ticket" item such as financing a home. The idea of my being "in hiding" is ridiculous considering that I write this from a residence that I am owner of record from. I have lived openly and your suggestion to my hiding is sort of like attempting to hide an elephant behind a bamboo stalk, transparent, clearly evident and openly seen by all. I do not participate in scams, nor do I condone such action. I also believe that every transaction should be a win-win transaction for all parties involved and am meticulous and care enough about my families I assist to take the time to explain everything. This has resulted in relationships cemented firmly and my trust earned as a counselor and financial steward for the insight I provide on a variety of areas involving real estate finance by clientele, financial planners, real estate firm owners, real estate investors and many others. I say to you Star47 whomever you are (CJ Good) that the softest pillow anyone can lay their head down to is a conscience and mine is soft and plush. True, Lynda did default and I feel guilt by association of her and remorse in that respect. How could I not? She intends to make those whole within the scope of her ability and obviously desire is there but firm capacity is not or we would not be having this dialogue. Yes a suit exists that will play out but then again she has never denied owing the money she was entrusted with and unintentionally defaulted on due to the circumstances. The end results will be positive and the work out arrangements will be reasonable. Let the legal remedy take its course. I implore you not to resort to mudslinging tactics but to take the high ground and defer to the attorney's in the lawsuit.