Marcia
Van Nuys,#2Author of original report
Tue, June 01, 2004
After months of wrangling, our contractual relationship with LTT has been terminated under conditions acceptable to both parties. I must say, Bill Rueth, Customer Service Manager, was polite at all times and really tried to work with us.
Robin
Waldron,#3Consumer Comment
Thu, February 05, 2004
These lawyers drive me nuts with their "defamation" claims and lawsuits. This attorney is writing a letter for money and has probably NEVER tried the product.
This is tantamount to false advertising where some movie star tries to sell you something he/she does not even use.
Send Attorney Parsons a dinner invitation and ask him to at least sample some of the product he is trying to defend before attacking with legal warnings.
If he accepts (not likely), serve Attorney Parsons some of that product and show him the freezer manufacture date while he is there.
See if he agrees that this product is as good as it was represented to be.
Also, how can the three-day-cancellation rule apply to something you have not even seen during that period?
Perhaps you SHOULD consult with your own attorney about this and make sure that he/she gets a sample of the product for reference!
Marcia
Van Nuys,#4Author of original report
Thu, February 05, 2004
Letter from attorney Ronald S. Parsons (Woodland Hills) claims the reason we are disatisfied with LTT's service is "nothing more than buyer's remorse". Why on earth would anybody want to return a product they were satisfied with and cost less money?
The freezer that was delivered (on 11/20/03)with the food HAS a 02/02 date of manufacture and was not delivered in a crate. Attorney says we were provided with a NEW freezer. Since our Rip-off Report indicates the freezer was two years old, we must make a retraction forthwith "to avoid legal action". I will be providing a photo of the decal which indicates we did NOT publish a false statement, which may damage his client's business -- that we were telling the TRUTH!
What's more, Mr. Parsons states that, "If you pursue any legal action against LTT as stated in your letter, LTT will vigorously defend itself".
LTT claims that it remains willing to replace or exchange any of the items we are not satisfied with . . . what would they replace it with? More of the same or something better . . . what we thought we were buying in the first place?
BOTTOM LINE: Consumer, in good faith believes that they were misled re claims made about LTT's meat/product and consumer better NOT try to take legal action to right a wrong.