- Report: #1132636
Complaint Review: Jacob Frydman - Hyde Park New York
Reported By:
Ex Employee Whistle Blower -
Nationwide,
Submitted:
Updated:
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
Jacob Frydman
46 Ledgerock lane Hyde Park, New York, USA
Phone:
917-578-3800
Web:
www.urpa.com
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
SPECIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS FOUND TO BE FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY A COURT. OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT WAS FOUND FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY THE COURT HAS BEEN (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))
Editor’s Comment: (04/11/2019) -. Ripoff Report believes in transparency and the more information the better. In this instance, there has been court action regarding this subject Report. We believe it important to note that not all Court Orders are alike. Many court orders are absolutely legitimate and we make no representations about this court order situation. However, we want our users to be aware that sometimes courts enter orders based upon default which typically means that the defendant didn’t show up. Sometimes a defendant won’t show up because they didn’t even get notice of the case proceedings in the first place and other times defendants may not show up because they don’t necessarily have the knowledge and/or the financial resources to fight. Still, in other instances, a defendant may simply appear only to stipulate (settle) the case by agreeing to stipulate to a court order because they are being bullied by the plaintiff and whether what they said was true or not, they just want the matter to go away so they can move on with life and make the plaintiff go away. Again, we make no representations about this particular court order situation. We are simply providing you with additional information so that you may be more informed in general and, coupled with any additional research you feel is necessary, may make your own informed decision regarding the validity of this Report (or anything that may be left of it after redaction). As always, we encourage our readers to do their homework and not just rely on one single source for information.
The Court Order dated May 28, 2015 relating to United Realty Advisors, LP et al v. Verschleiser et al, from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:14-cv-05903 – JGK (Related Case: 1:14-cv-0808-JGK) that caused the redaction can be seen here: (https://www.scribd.com/document/405914384/United-Realty-Advisors-LP-Et-Al-v-Verschleiser-Et-Al-Doc-64-Court-Order-for-Permanent-Injunction-Dated-5-28-2015).
If you are interested in how a post on Ripoff Report was involved in this matter, you can review where Ripoff Report is mentioned in paragraphs 83, 84, 85 and 90 in the Initial Compliant filed on July 30, 2014 here: (https://www.scribd.com/document/405914575/United-Realty-Advisors-LP-Et-Al-v-Verschleiser-Et-Al-Initial-Complaint-Filed-7-30-2014)
As of April 10, 2019, it appears that the underlying case is still ongoing per the court docket, wherein over 474 documents have been filed, that may be accessed via PACER (https://www.pacer.gov/). Please consider reviewing the entire legal file to gain better understandings of the positions of the parties and how matters are resolved. We may not update this posting further with any new information and you should seek additional and updated information out on your own if you want to learn more and have a more complete picture.
END OF EDITOR’S COMMENT
THE ORIGINAL REPORT IS UNDER THE LINE IMMEDIATELY BELOW
____________________________________________________
(((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))
