Damita
Mesquite,#2REBUTTAL Individual responds
Sat, September 21, 2002
In response to "airing dirty laundry",it seems that denial or diversionary techniques tend to justify mistreatment and harrassment as well. I was mistreated. The necessary parties were aware and seemed to turn a deaf ear. I also tried to resolve this matter with HR and this Principal directly to no avail because she's still the principal and I'm out of the picture. Was I a liability risk? Was this harrassment a necessary part of "motivating" people and encouraging production? Was this necessary to do business? Why continue to promote "poison" up the ranks? Not only did this principal hurt herself by mistreating me and allowing the mistreatment of my daughter, but she has also crippled the school's chances of recruitment of skilled employees and has risked the school's reputation and credibility that could have been prevented. If unity is the answer, then let's be real about the matter and truthful.
Mahogany
San Diego,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, August 27, 2002
It seems as though this matter would be better handled if taken through the proper channels before airing dirty laundry before the public. If the school is a ministry up under the TD Jakes ministry, then perhaps the complaintant should go through the ranks of being heard there and fast and pray before doing so. God is just. Love
Mahogany
San Diego,#4Consumer Comment
Tue, August 27, 2002
It seems as though this matter would be better handled if taken through the proper channels before airing dirty laundry before the public. If the school is a ministry up under the TD Jakes ministry, then perhaps the complaintant should go through the ranks of being heard there and fast and pray before doing so. God is just. Love Mahogany