Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Donelson, Ciancio, & Goodwin, P.C. Daniel T. Goodwin Felony Theft, Fraud, Perjury, Conspiracy Broomfield, Colorado
Known felon, Daniel T. Goodwin of Donelson, Ciancio, and Goodwin, P.C., in criminal conspiracy with his clients, Ron Murphy, Scott Murphy, Ida (Eve) Murphy, and Dream Stone, Inc., has caused former employee's Weld County District Court civil suit for accrued wages to be dismissed by fraudulently, SIMULTANEOUSLY SWEARING TO BOTH THE COLORADO DIVISION OF LABOR AND THE COURT that NEITHER had jurisdiction over the accrued wage claim, because the matter was before the other.
Equity partner Daniel T. Goodwin, had fraudulently caused the former employee's case to be dismissed with prejudice, and obtained an award of attorney's fee in excess of $20,000.00.
Goodwin,in criminal conspiracy with his clients, Ron Murphy, Scott Murphy, Ida (Eve) Murphy, and Dream Stone, Inc.,immediately filed a spurious lien on the former employee's home, in violation of C.R.S.38-41-201.
Dream Stone, Inc. secretary/treasurer Ida (Eve) Murphy has sworn, since my termination of employment due to hostile work environment in September 2008, that she was going to destroy us, take everything they own, and, cause them so much agony, according to Dream Stone general manager, Todd Coday.
I believe Mr. Goodwin's acts to constitute Class 3 Felony Theft By Deception, fraud, and criminal conspiracy, in addition to multiple violations of C.R.P.C. Rules.
Evidence obtained from the Weld County District Attorney's Office indicates that all equity partners of DC&G knew of Goodwin's criminal conduct, yet failed, as required by the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, to report the illegal activity to the appropriate law enforcement agencies.
I believe DC&G is prosecutable under Colorado's Organized Crime Control Act.
Law Enforcement Agencies, please view the following articles of evidence at scribd.com:
and the evidencesubsequently received from CDLE Director Ellen Golombek March 30, 2011, please note the time lines, and the allegations in the emails, as they pertain to paragraph #8 of the Response to Motion contained in the following file: