Betty
New York,#2UPDATE EX-employee responds
Tue, April 30, 2002
In response to SAl, New YOrk, New York-THE HARASSER!! In response to your misinformed comments-my various civil issues and investigations are presently OPEN! With the following: Senator Hilary Rodham CLinton's Office Attorney General Eliiot Spitzer Open Case The NY City Bar Disciplinary Committee Contact: Investigator Kenny Van Lew The Unemployemnt Appeal Board Hearing Date: May 2002 The US Human Rights Division Sexual Harassment Unit Case: Open Contact Joyce Yearwood And, further, my former legal represenative and I amicably went our seperate ways. It was not because my case has no merit or as you claim I had no other recourse. IF my case was as frivilous as you ignorantly imply why then are the foregoing agencies presently investigating them?? And, Sal, of course you would deny the civil suit yu have pending for sexual misconduct with a minor. You are a SMUG PIG. Nothihg more or less. And, although, it is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS I pay child support like many, many mothers do due to the fact that I had to leave my home under extreme circumstances. And further, I have FAITHFULLY and consistently paid my payments to my son. Now, that speaks VOLUMES about my character. You would know nothing about integrity or character so I will not even attempt to discuss that at length with the likes of you. CHILD MOLESTER and PEDOPHILE. Why don't you explain why all the females in hour office are warned by THE PARTNERS themselves to stay away from you?? Why don't you explain why I have signed witness affidavits affirning your ssexually depraved character and work ethics?? Why don't you explain about your making racially degrogatory comments to a Indian AMerican associate at yor firm and he suing the firm for racial discrimminiation and the firm settling the matter because of your lack of character. It's hard to believe that you are an attorney in light of all the FACTS stated above. And, in conclusion, please furnish proof that these cases are indeed closed. Obviously you THE HARASSER seem to have an inside link with all the contacts I have already mentioned. YOU ARE A JOKE YOU JERK!!
Sal
New York,#3REBUTTAL Individual responds
Fri, April 26, 2002
The truth of this matter is that Betty is a disgruntled ex-employee who refused to do her job and poorly performed whatever few duties she actually did do. She was not fired, but stormed out of the office and did not return until the following day, after she had already been replaced with a temp. All of her cases and complaints have been dismissed and her attorney has refused to represent her further in a civil matter because he has realized that her claims are fabricated and without merit. These cases and complaints, which she claims to have pending, but have already been dismissed, are a matter of public record. Anyone interested in knowing the truth may contact the offices with which she claims to have cases pending, inquire about the matters of Betty Parilla, and find out that they have, in fact, been dismissed by the offices themselves. This is the truth as to why she has no recourse. If, in fact, Mr. Maiorino was in the situation that Betty claims, would he be facing a civil law suit or a prison term? Would a mother want to sue such a "SCUM", as Betty puts it, or want to have him arrested? Mr. Maiorino is not facing any law suit, and in fact, is currently practicing law. His record as an attorney, like every other attorney's record, is also a matter of public record and the truth may be found simply by inquiring with the State's Office of Attorney Ethics. As for Ms. Whyte, she is an African-American married to a white male and has been for over 20 years. Ms. Whyte was involved in an interraccial relationship at a most difficult time, over 20 years ago when interacial relationships were taboo and marriages were practically forbidden. She, obviously, is not a racist. In addition, Betty fails to mention that fact that she and Ms. Whyte were friends for seven years as co-workers and Ms. Whyte was the one who got Betty her job here. Why would Betty go work for someone she worked with before and knew for seven years if she was so horrible? I know nothing of the child supporet payment situation, but what I do know is that in NY state, as with most states, the father usually pays child support and custody is given to the mother. Only in the most extreme cases, where the mother is obviously unfit, will the father get custody and the mother have to pay child support. The fact that Betty Parilla pays child support speaks volumes in and of itself and is further evidence that she is unstable and of questionable character. A family court judge obviously thought so.