Complaint Review: DCF FLORIDA - Internet

I'm so sorry folks.  I made a mistake in my last rebuttal in that I posted two identical links for the DOMESTIC BATTERY charges and did not post the link for the CONVICTED THIEF!

Here's the court link showing the details of this CONVICTED PETIT THIEF:  http://www.seminoleclerk.org/CriminalDocket/case_detail.jsp?CaseNo=592011MM002297A

I can only hope that if this criminal, violent fruit cake actually files a lawsuit against the DCF and others that the judge has the good sense to toss the suit out.

In the mean time, I can only hope that she doesn't become pregnant again.  If there was ever a case to be made for compulsary sterilization, this is it.

To Robert, thanks for doing all the work I was going to do myself.

To OP, you are only digging your hole deeper with every thing you post here and who knows where else.  You need help, but not to get your child back.  I say this not to be cruel, but you do come across as people who are mentally disturbed.  The responses you are getting not only here, but other venues  only reinforces my statement.

Great reporting!!! Thanks!

Yes indeed, let's discuss all the facts, including your criminal activity.

1.  Last year you had case with DCF and had to have a lawyer make up a parenting plan for you!

2.  Early spring you're arrested for two counts of domestic BATTERY.  One count specifies by strangulation.

3.  After that, you're arrested for shoplifting and subsequently CONVICTED OF PETIT THEFT!

Here's some links to confirm your criminal activities:

http://www.seminoleclerk.org/CriminalDocket/case_detail.jsp?CaseNo=592011CF000442A

http://www.seminoleclerk.org/CriminalDocket/case_detail.jsp?CaseNo=592011MM002175A

http://www.seminoleclerk.org/CriminalDocket/case_detail.jsp?CaseNo=592011MM002175A

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/legal-malpractice-526739.html

In case anyone is interested in what the loser thief looks like, her mug shot is found here:

http://florida.arrests.org/Arrests/Stacia_Adams_5338583/

Is it any wonder  that DCF is taking some time before returning the child to you?  You actually have the NERVE to sue them because they are trying to protect the child from your violent and criminal behavior?

Perhaps you should spend less time wasting the court's time and taxpayer's money and start cleaning up your act!  I would also suggest that you have your tubes tied.  IMHO, you've made too many kids already.

People are not going to wade through what amounts to pages and pages of court documents or pleadings.

You say that we are like DCF, well if you are giving them the same "facts" it is no wonder they are not listening to you.   If you want to to explain what is happening to you and why you think it is wrong that it appears your kids were taken away then post that.  If you don't do that your posts will come off as Drivel and you will be thought of as a Nut Case.

Hello, I think you are like DCF!    READ AND YOU WILL UNDERSTAND! Think about it!!!!!

I just want people to have ALL the facts!

Think of this as Twitter. Nobody has the patience to read all your legalese. In short, chronologically, what did you do, or were accused of doing that led at a given point to your children being removed.

Short of providing this, you just come off as being a nut case.

More pages of drivel from these two!

Let the Record show:
Judges, Attorneys, Caseworkers and POLICE officers, THE CEO OF CBC along with Supervisors, The Attorney General, the Supreme Court, and the Governor, all in the state of Florida are KNOWING of our abuse AND THE ABUSE ON (OUR SON WHILE IN STATE CARE) THE EMOTIONAL TORMENT CAEDEN IS PUTTING HIM SELF THREW DAILY BECAUSE WE HAVE TO
LEAVE HIM. We can not comfort Caeden because we left. His comfort now comes from his great grandparents which also have suffered the pain of the abuse by these people. The government along with many state or county employes have refused to act to protect us. More harm has been done to Caeden in state care than ever was done at home.

So we now must be SUI JURIS

WE will now be"Pro Se" means "represent yourself" (I AM, MYSELF, SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY and am not ASKING for the RIGHT to
REPRESENT ANYBODY. The Court cannot refute the essential TRUTH of Protected Inherent Rights) I AM in the courtroom, and that God is Present and in control of the proceedings, and only the TRUTH will go into the Record.

I am Sovereign Child of God, with in-a-lien-able Inherent Rights that were laid out in the Bill of Rights, and the government is
constitutionally restricted to interfere with my sovereign rights.

Judge Galluzzo Let the Record show that the STATE had no Lawful documents to come into our home or to be holding or to have taken my CHILD in January 2011 and then again in March 2011"Also Judge Galluzzo  you have been upholding
violations of due process in the very first hearings against my family, you have made corrupt orders and this must be confronted by my family. WE DISPUTE ALL THE LIES TOLD ON US IN THE STATES TESTIMONY! We were never given that chance until now! THIS HAS BEEN SLANNDER!

Judge Galluzzo you routinely have allowed hearsay reports of police and caseworkers, attorneys and foster parents, to be admitted in written form to manufacture a slanderous paper trail, call this "evidence" and then use this to justify taking our child. WE ARE MAKING A OFFER OF PROOF for OUR appeal" THERE HAS BEEN NO DUE PROCESS AND WE DEMAND IT NOW.

WE Demand for Discovery from our cases. DEPENDANCY COURT, WE are not in a real court, there are no defendants
and there are no charges against US. WE have not been "charged" with a crime but we have been treated like we have. WE NEVER HAVE GOTTEN DUE PROCESS IN THESE DEPENDANCY COURT HRARINGS. We have been accused, and this is not lawful prosecution.

All that has happened in the state of Florida with our understanding the State is grants to keep my son in the system and this is corrupt. The state of Florida will also get a bonuses if they adopt him out plus a little extra because he has special needs. The state needs to refund that money to the tax payers.

((((( In reality, for the agency to be compliant to receive federal money, the law says they must show by written affidavit that all effort has been made to prevent the removal of the child. We have never, ever one time seen such an affidavit or proof of any effort)))))))

WE WILL TRY TO TAKE a Crowd into the Courtroom Every Time WE GO NOW!

Even a president ends up in front of a judge. The courtroom and opportunity for redress of grievances is a "safety valve" for society, and that by blocking access to the Public Record for citizens, a powder keg has been intensifying under increasing pressure for a long time, and is about to blow. This is our Constitutional Judicial Due Process of Law.

"Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789, Section 342,FIRST CONGRESS, Sess. 1, ch. 20, 1789

All reasonable efforts was not made to prevent the removal of my child from my family".We have NEVER seen corroborating affidavits, nor any evidence of what those "reasonable efforts" were!

Judges, attorneys, caseworkers and officers, THE CEO OF CBC along with supervisors, the Attorney General, the Supreme Court, and the Governor, all in the state of Florida are KNOWING of our abuse and have refused to act to protect us.
also any officials who have knowledge of OUR case directly and are knowingly allowing the courts and agencies to violate OUR rights or protect criminal public servants be accountable for their silence and being corrupt. OUR CHILD IS BEING DESTROYED OVER THIS WHOLE CASE. WE WANT EVERYONE TO ACOUNTABLE FOR THIS.

Raul speakingMy Attorney K. Fletcher did not defend me, and did not object to testimony that incriminated me that is not credible evidence that the state has made on a lot of o cations, he allowed hearsay to go into the record, I also felt he led me into some self incrimination. I felt because I did not know my rights that this self incrimination has happened and
now let the record show this that I want a new hearing I HAVE A DISABILTY AND THIS NEEDS CONSIDERATION.

MY WIFE HAS A POA NOW (so she can speak or write for me).

NOW AT THIS TIME LET THE RECORD OF FLORIDA SHOW WE SEEK JUSTICE !!!!!!

Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry (SUI JURIS)
Raul Irizarry (SUI JURIS)
3405 HANNA AVE N
LEHIGH ACRES FL, 33971
PARENTS OF CAEDEN KENNETH RAUL IRIZARRY
SEMINOLE COUNTY FLORIDA CASE

Florida,

We know why you are OK with the abuse of children in foster homes our son is because they government funds this state with grants 60,000-90,000 per child a year in foster care. We pay taxes were does this money go? I KNOW EVERYBODY MAY WANT
ME TO STOP THE LETTERS But, That's not going to happen! I know my god given right and constitutional rights now pretty good I have done a lot of reading lately after all the pain and suffering I ind-err daily after Judge Galluzzo got done with me in court two weeks ago. I SHALL PRACTICE EVERY RIGHT I HAVE! My tax dollars fund these grants from the government to hold my son captive and I want this stopped. This state is corrupt and MY WHOLE FAMILY WILL EXPOSE THIS TO THE PUBLIC!

EVERY SINGLE PERSON I SEND A COPY OF THIS TO I HOLD ACCOUNTABLE EVEN WHEN I GET EMAILS BACK SAYING OH' WE
CANT DO ANYTHING!!!!!

WELL GUESS WHAT I WILL EMAIL YOU EVERY DAY UNTIL I DIE OVER THIS CORRUPTION!

Each person that reads this has the opportunity to fight this unjust system but most all of you will say Mr and Ms Irizarry we understand your concerns well if you understand help me out instead OF DOING NOTHING!!!!!!! I WILL NAME YOU IN A LAW
SUIT IF I haven't already......YOU CONTINUE TO DO NOTHING!!!

GIVE ME MY SON BACK NOW! ITS BEEN TO LONG! You pay for nothing for him.......... What has he gotten? Taken
from the only home he ever knew and abused in foster home's THANKS FLORIDA FOR ALL THE SUPPORT!!!!!!!

I know you don't care. You call immunity (well you have no immunity under GOD)

The Irizarrys
September 20,2011

To Whom it may concern,

Hello I am Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry and I am Raul Irizarry. We are the parents of Caeden Kenneth Raul Irizarry. We are going to let you know right away that WE send the same emails to every one. Sometimes we get a email and other times we
don't. The reason of this email is because our attorney said Ms and Mr Irizarry leave and make a paper trail so far WE have. In some of the emails that we have gotten back have said Confidentiality Notice:  This message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information that is exempt from public disclosure.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.
 If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender (by phone or reply electronic mail) and then destroy all
copies of the original message.
Well WE WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT AFTER THIS IS MAIL IS SENT AND WE GET ANOTHER EMAIL BACK THAT STATES THAT WE WILL DISREGARD THAT INFORMATION AND PUBLISH ALL FUTUTRE EMAILS SO THE PUBLIC AND SEE HOW OUR
government REALL WORKS

So let the record show WE let you know ahead of time!

Now
lets move on We want to know why the corrupt activities are still
happening and you wont do anything?

STOP SENDING US EMAILS THAT STATE OH' its somebody else's job.
WE CAN READ!!!!!! CAN YOU?

WE WILL NOW GIVE YOU A OUTLINE ON WHO DOES WHAT!!!!!!!

President- is the head of state and head of government of the United States. The president leads the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.

Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests the executive power of the United States in the president and charges him with the execution of federal law, alongside the responsibility of appointing federal executive, diplomatic, regulatory, and judicial
officers, and concluding treaties with foreign powers, with the advice and consent of the Senate.
The president is further empowered to grant federal pardons and reprieves, and to convene and adjourn either or both houses of Congress under extraordinary circumstances.[5] Since the founding of the United States, the power of the president and the
federal government have grown substantially[6] and each modern president, despite possessing no formal legislative
powers beyond signing or vetoing congressionally passed bills, is largely responsible for dictating the legislative agenda of his party and the foreign and domestic policy of the United States.[7] The president is frequently described as the most powerful person in the world.[8][9][10][11][12][13]

The president is indirectly elected by the people through the Electoral College to a four-year term, and is one of only two nationally elected federal officers, the other being the Vice President of the United States.[14] The Twenty-second
Amendment, adopted in 1951, prohibits anyone from ever being elected to the presidency for a third full term. It also prohibits a person from being elected to the presidency more than once if that person previously had served as president, or acting
president, for more than two years of another person's term as president. In all, 43 individuals have served 55 four-year terms.[15] On January 20, 2009, Barack Obama became the forty-fourth and current president.
Congress- is the bicameral legislature of the federal government of the United States, consisting of the Senate and
the House of Representatives. The Congress meets in the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Both senators and representatives are chosen through direct election. Each of the 435 members of the House of Representatives represents a districtand serves a two-year term. House seats are apportioned among the states by population.
Each state, regardless of population, has two senators; since there are fifty states, there are one hundred senators who serve six-year terms. The terms are staggered, so every two years, approximately one-third of the Senate is up for election. While it's theoretically possible to have total turnover in the House every two years and in the Senate every six years, actual turnover is much less, since most incumbents seek re-election, and their historical likelihood of winning subsequent elections exceeds 90%.[1] LEGISTATE is a kind of deliberative assembly with the power to pass, amend, and repeal laws.[1] The law created by a legislature is called legislation or statutory law.
In addition to enacting laws, legislatures usually have exclusive authority to raise or lower taxes and adopt the budget and
other money bills. Legislatures are known by many names, the most common being parliament and congress, although these terms also have more specific meanings.

In parliamentary systems of government, the legislature is formally supreme and appoints a member from its house as the prime minister which acts as the executive.[2] In a presidential system, according to the separation of powers doctrine,
the legislature is considered an independent and coequal branch of government along with both the judiciary and
the executive.[3] The primary components of a legislature are one or more chambers or houses: assemblies that debate and vote upon bills.
A legislature with only one house is called unicameral.
A bicamerallegislature possesses two separate chambers, usually described as an upper house and a lower house, which often differ in duties, powers, and the methods used for the selection of members. Much rarer have been tricameral legislatures;
the Massachusetts Governor's Council still exists, but the most recent national example existed in the waning years of caucasian-minority rule in South Africa.
In most parliamentary systems, the lower house is the more powerful house while the upper house is merely a chamber of advice or review. However, in presidential systems, the powers of the two houses are often similar or equal. In federations,
it is typical for the upper house to represent the component states; the same applies to the supranational legislature of the European Union.
For this purpose, the upper house may either contain the delegates of state governments, as is the case in the European Union and in Germany and was the case in the United States before 1913, or be elected according to a formula that grants equal
representation to states with smaller populations, as is the case in Australia and the modern United States.
Because members of legislatures usually sit together in a specific room to deliberate, seats in that room may be assigned exclusively to members of the legislature. In parliamentary language, the termseat is sometimes used to mean that someone is a member of a legislature. For example, saying that a legislature has 100 "seats" means that there are 100 members of the legislature, and saying that someone is "contesting a seat" means they are trying to get elected as a member of the legislature. By extension, the term seat is often used in less formal contexts to refer to an electoral district itself, as for example in the phrases "safe seat" and "marginal seat".
Attorney General-In most common law jurisdictions, the attorney general, or attorney-general, is the main legal advisor to the government, and in some jurisdictions he or she may also have executive responsibility for law enforcement or
responsibility for public prosecutions.

The term is used to refer to any person who holds a general power of attorney to represent a principal in all matters. In the common law tradition, anyone who represents the state, especially in criminal prosecutions, is such an attorney. Although a government may designate some official as the permanent attorney general, anyone who comes to represent the state in the same way is referred to as such, even if only for a particular case.
Inspector General-is an investigative official in a civil or military organization.
The plural of the term is Inspectors General Governor- is a governing official, usually the executive (at least nominally, to different degrees also politically and administratively) of a non-sovereign level of government, ranking under the head
of state. In federations, a governor may be the title of each appointed or elected politician who governs a constituent
state.
In countries the heads of the constitutive states, provinces, communities and regions may be titled Governor, although this is less common in parliamentary systems such as in some European nations and many of their former colonies, which use titles
such as President of the Regional Council in France and Ministerprsident in Germany, where in some states there are governorates (German:Regierungsbezirke) as sub-state administrative regions. Other countries using different
titles for sub-national units include Spain and Switzerland.
The title also lies, historically, to executive officials acting as representatives of a chartered company which has been granted exercise of sovereignty in a colonial area, such as the British HEIC or the Dutch VOC.
These companies operate as a major state within a state with its own armed forces.
There can also be non-political governors: high ranking officials in private or similar governance such as commercial and non-profit management, styled governor(s), who simply govern an institution, such as a corporation or a bank.
For example, in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth countries there are prison governors ("warden" in the United
States), school governors and bank governors.

The adjective pertaining to a governor is gubernatorial, from the Latin root gubernare.[1] The correct female form is governess,
though especially in the US, female officials are often referred to by the male form of the noun to avoid confusion with other
meanings of the word.
Judge- is a person who presides over court proceedings, either alone or as part of a panel of judges. The powers, functions,
method of appointment, discipline, and training of judges vary widely across different jurisdictions.
The judge is supposed to conduct the trial impartially and in an open court.
The judge hears all the witnesses and any other evidence presented by the parties of the case, assesses the credibility and arguments of the parties, and then issues a ruling on the matter at hand based on his or her interpretation of the law and his or her own personal judgment. In some jurisdictions, the judge's powers may be shared with a jury.
In inquisitorial systems of criminal investigation, a judge might also be an examining magistrate.

Jury- is a sworn body  of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgement. Modern juries tend to be found in courts to ascertain the guilt, or lack thereof, in a crime. In Anglophone jurisdictions, the verdict may be guilty, not guilty, or (in Scotland) not proven.
Juries are composed of jurors (also sometimes known as jurymen), who are by definition laymanfinders of fact, not professionals.
The old institution of grand juries still exist in some places, particularly the United States, to investigate whether enough evidence of a crime exists to bring someone to trial.

The jury arrangement has evolved out of the earliest juries, which were found in early medieval England. Members were supposed to inform themselves of crimes and then of the details of the crimes. Their function was therefore closer to that of a grand jury than that of a jury in a trial.
CEO OF CBC/ chief executive officer- (CEO, American English), managing director (MD, British English)[1] or chief executive,
is the highest-ranking corporate officer (executive) or administrator in charge of total management of an organization.
An individual appointed as a CEO of a corporation, company, organization, or agency typically reports to the board
of directors.

NOW WE ALL CAN SEE WHO DOES WHAT AND WHO CAN DO IT......... So lets see how fast you can move and do what we have asked for. We have no more time to wait around and see you pass this around and say isn't or wasn't your JOB. So you will make change and you are going to do it soon and do you know why?
BECAUSE ITS YOUR JOB!

You know what is terrible? Us having to write you this email telling you what your job is.

You see we don't get to drive around in those nice car's that WE the tax payers pay for to keep you in your job.

We want to ask you something and WE expect you to plead the fifth (Yea we will offer you your constitutional right which WE have never once got offered) or answer this what would you do sitting in your office today IN this unjust corrupt government and state did this to you?

You are where you are today because you fault for your job, Family CHILD OR CHILDREN Thats all we are doing to. You would expect the same from others as WE expect from you.

(FYI) this letter is going to be posted on the internet as well as every other letter, Intent etc.
The people of the USA and The state of Florida and residents of SEMINOLE COUNTY needs to know what you should be doing! Every day you don't write back and ignore us with out regard makes a VERY BAD NAME FOR YOU.
Hey you aired our dirty laundry NOW WE WILL AIR YOURS! The public has rights and WE STAND FOR ALL THE PUBLIC.

INCASE THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS WHY THIS LETTER IS BEING SENT PLEASE REFER TO THE INTENT TO SUE ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED IS THERE!

RETURN CAEDEN RETURN CAEDEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you,
The Irizarry's

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH OF CITIZENSHIP STATUS
For all cases in the USA
September 2011

Raul and Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry  avers the following as being the immutable law of this land respecting THEIR own rights, liberty and property;
 
Be it known to all governments, government sub divisions, courts, and CBC/DCF other parties, that WE, Raul and Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry  are a natural, freeborn Sovereign FLORIDA in possession of the birthright as described in 4 Wheat 402 as quoted by Bouvier's 14th edition law dictionary as it describes individual American sovereignty and Hale vs. Henkel as it describes the nature of Citizens of the several States. We are neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity subject
to us. WE neither dominate anyone, nor are we dominated.
We are expressly not a United States citizen residing in FLORIDA as comprehended by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America or the equivalent as represented in the contemporary FLORIDA Constitutions. No federal
or state declaration regarding the status of OUR nature can alter that fact without diminishing OUR individually held rights without OUR consent and without injuring US.
WE do not consent. WE state here that WE are of age of majority and competent and knowledgeable of the following facts and law sufficient to assert this affidavit.
 
fh
The nature of OUR status in America is described at 4 Wheat 402 as cited by Bouvier's 14edition in definition of 'Sovereignty", to wit; Bouvier's 14th edition Law Dictionary (quoting from 4 Wheat, 402): "It has been justly thought a matter of importance to determine from what source the United States derives its authority... the question here proposed is whether our bond of union is a compact entered into by the states, or whether the Constitution is an organic law established by the People.
To this we answer:
 
 We The People ... ordain and establish this Constitution" ... the government of the state had only delegated power (from the People) and even if they had an inclination, they had no authority to transfer the authority of the Sovereign People. The people in their capacity as Sovereigns made and adopted the Constitution; and Lit bjnds the state governments without the state's
consent. The United States, as a whole, therefore, emanates from the People and not from the states, and the Constitution and laws of the states whether made before or since the adoption of that Constitution of the United States, are subordinate to the United States Constitution and the laws made in pursuance of it. The people are the Fountain of sovereignty. The
whole was originally with them as their own.
The state governments are but trustees acting under a .'
derived authority, and had no power to delegate what is not delegated to them. But the Affidavit of
Truth of Citizenship Status     
                                      Page
1 of 1
 
 
 Mem aot#2
 
 people, as the original Fountain, might take away what they have lent and entrust to whom they please. They have the whole title and as absolute proprietors have the right of using or abusing. - jus utendi et abutendi. It is a maxim consecrated in public law as well as common sense and the necessity of the case that a Sovereign is answerable for his acts only to his God and his own conscience ,.. There is no authority above a Sovereign to which an appeal can be made. "4 Wheat, 402 (Bouvier's 14th edition Law Dictionary: "Sovereignty") "The words "People of the United States" and "Citizens" are synonymous terms, and mean
the same thing. They both describe the political body that, according to our Republican institutions form the sovereignty... they are what we familiarly call the "Sovereign people", and every citizen is one of these people and a constituent member of the
sovereignty..." Wong Kim Ark. P. 914, quoting Dred Scott vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 19 How 577. See also: Hancock vs. Carry Alcorn Mining Co., Inc., Ky., 503 S. W. 2 d 710 Kentucky Constitution section 4; Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hancock vs. Paxton Kentucky, 516 S. W. 2 d page 867(2) clause 

3. "A SOVEREIGN IS ANSWERABLE ONLY TO GOD AND CONSCIENCE" TAKE NOTICE: SOVEREIGNTY DESCRIBED HEREIN EXTENDS TO OUR LIFE, OUR LIBERTY AND OUR PROPETY INCLUSIVE OF OUR MEND, PREROGATIVE AND CHOICE OF
ACTION THAT HARMS NO OTHER, ALL OF WHICH EXISTS SOLELY WITHIN MY OWN PRIVATE DOMAIN WHICH IS MARKED AND SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THAT OF THIS STATE AND WHICH IS
BOUNDED BY A BRIGHT LINE BOUNDARY ACROSS WHICH NO MAN OR AGENT OF GOVERNMENT SHALL CROSS WITHOUT MY VOLUNTARY CONSENT. 

Rights retained by the people include but are not limited to those eluded to in the following U.S. Supreme Court case insofar as it
supports OUR sovereign birthright (accent added on point): "The individuals may stand upon their constitutional rights as a citizen. They are entitled to carry on their private business in their own way. Their power to contract is unlimited. We
owe no such duty [to submit their books and papers for an examination] to the State, since they receives nothing there from, beyond the protection of their life and property. Their rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken
 
Affidavit of Truth of Citizenship                                         
Status Page 2 of 2
 
Mem aot#2
 
 from them by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among their rights are a refusal to incriminate them selves, and the immunity of their selves and their property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. They owe nothing to the public so long as they do not trespass upon their rights." Hale v. Henkel. 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).
  
Rights possessed by us individually include but are not limited to; The right to carry on our private business in our
own way so long as that use does not harm or trespass on anyone. Thus, be it known to all that even though we recognize and respect those collectively held powers granted to governments, We reserve our individually held prerogative rights of action not to be compelled to perform under any contract or disability that we did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. A compelled state license to use OUR property upon the public right of way is one such disability.
As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to US, and are null and void acts when applied to US. If we have participated in any of the supposed "benefits" associated with these hidden contracts, We have done so under duress from coercion, miss-information, and ignorance of our true nature and rightful power. We correct that ignorance here. From our age of consent to the date affixed below WE have never signed a contract knowingly, willingly, intelligently, and voluntarily whereby We have waived any of our individually held natural Rights, and, as such, 
 
Take Notice that WE revoke, cancel, and make void, ab initio. OUR power of appointment on any and all contracts, agreements, forms, or any instrument which may be construed in any way to give any agency or department of any federal or state government authority, venue, or jurisdiction over US upon subject matter that is solely within our individual province; one being our Right to be free from all government restraint of our choice of action unless WE have first harmed or trespassed upon the rights of another.
This position is in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brady v. U.S.. 379 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970): "Waivers of
Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the
relevant circumstances and consequences." Declaration of Citizenship. Any document signed by us, in which WE answered
"yes" to the question, "Are you a U.S. citizen?" - cannot be used to compromise my status as a Sovereign,
 
Affidavit of Truth of Citizenship Status                                              
Page 3 of 3
  
Mem aot#2
 
nor obligate us to perform in any manner. This is because it was not disclosed to us that being a U.S. citizen altered my birthright and diminished my individually retained private rights through the "Doctrine of Selective Incorporation". WE are not a "United States" citizen residing in FLORIDA. We are an FLORIDA as comprehended by the birthright of "We the People" defined at 4 wheat 402. The United States is an entity created by the U.S. Constitution with jurisdiction as described on the following pages of this Affidavit. We are not a "resident of," an "inhabitant of," a "franchise of," a "subject of," a "ward of," the "property of," the "chattel of," or "subject to the jurisdiction of any corporate federal government, corporate state government, corporate county government, corporate city government, or corporate municipal body politic created under the authority of the U.S. Constitution nor the FLORIDA Constitution as that jurisdiction comprehends any subject matter that would dimmish
our individually held prerogative rights. We are not subject to any legislation, department, or agency created by such authorities, nor to the jurisdiction of any employees, officers, or agents deriving their authority there from as that jurisdiction comprehends any subject matter that would diminish our individually held prerogative rights. Further, We are not a subject of the Administrative and Legislative Article III Courts of the several states, or Article I Courts of the United States, or bound by precedents of such courts, deriving their jurisdiction from said authorities as that jurisdiction comprehends any subject matter that would diminish our individually held prerogative rights. 
 
Take Notice that we hereby revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio any such instrument or any presumed election made by any of the several states or the United States government or any agency or department thereof, that we are or ever have voluntary elected to be treated as a United States citizen, subject to its jurisdiction, or a resident of any territory, possession, instrumentality or enclave under the sovereignty or exclusive jurisdiction of any of the several states or of the United
States as defined in the FLORIDA or U.S. Constitutions.
 
Therefore, in addition to the fact that no unrevealed federal or state contract can obligate us to perform in any manner without my fully informed and un-coerced consent, likewise, no federal or state statutes or regulations apply to us or have any jurisdiction over our actions taken within us individually held prerogative rights where same harms no one. We hereby affirm that we do not reside or work in any federal territory of the "District" United States, and that therefore no U.S. federal government statutes or regulations have any authority over us.
  
Affidavit of  Truth of Citizenship Status                                
page 4 of 4
 
 Mem aot#2
 
Affidavit of Truth of Citizenship Status                                              
Page 5 of 5
 
Mem aot#2
 
 The use of notary does NOT grant any jurisdiction to anyone and as such none is necessary as we personally will be glad, in special appearance, to verify that all statements within are true to the best of my knowledge and that WE assert each and every one through this document as truth. OUR signature below is evidence of that fact.
 
 FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
 
Dated

Raul and Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
hereby certify that the above was copied and sent; mailed/faxed or delivered this day of              
to:
  
All Rights Reserved
r
by: Raul and Stacia Ann Adams II Irizarry
and real-party-in-interest
239-333-8836
Email [email protected]

Affidavit of Truth of Citizenship Status                                
 Page 6 of 6
 
Mem aot#2
 
Sworn and subscribed  before me _____________of this day________ year______
 
Notary Public
 
, Custodian of records         By;
_____________________Affidavit
 
Affidavit of Truth of Citizenship Status                                        
Page 7 of 7

OK, you've posted this twice without telling us how you were ripped off.  I'm going to assume that DCF took your child(ren) away from you and adopted them out, am I right?

Rather than a civics lesson, why not provide details about how you were ripped off?