;
  • Report:  #196226

Complaint Review: Creative Mouse - Joel Mottinger - Claire Mottinger - Portland Oregon

Reported By:
- del mar, California,
Submitted:
Updated:

Creative Mouse - Joel Mottinger - Claire Mottinger
7327 SW Barnes Rd, Suite 523 Portland, 97225 Oregon, U.S.A.
Phone:
866-6644343
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
We hired Joel Mottinger of Creative Mouse to develop a website for us. The scope of the work was outlined by us on a geekbidder.com and Creative Mouse bid on the project. A contract was signed stating that there would be 3 American Developers in Portland would be working on this project. We were paying roughly $75 per man hour.

We paid Creative mouse several thousand up front to get started on this project. As goals were met we continued to pay more money to creative mouse. A few months into the project it came to our attention that the project was outsourced to a company in India.

As the project was nearing completion the Indian development team stopped working. When we contacted them as to why the project had stopped they told us that Creative Mouse hadn't paid them yet. Creative Mouse refused to pay the money to the development team or to return the money to us.

We had to pay the Indian development team directly to get the source code for our website.

We came to find out that shortly after our contract was signed, Creative Mouse filled for bankruptcy but failed to tell us. Creative Mouse committed fraud by falsly portraying themselves as a company with over 50 employees.

Creative Mouse committed embezzlement by not paying the money to the Indian development team, but instead pocketing nearly %100 of the money that was paid to them. Creative Mouse committed theft by taking our money and not providing the services we paid for.

We have a list of several other victims of Joel Mottinger that cross several state lines, including the Indian development team that crosses national borders. We have filled a report with the Sherrif's department in Multnomah CO, Oregon because they were the only one that would take a report. No other agency would recognize this as a criminal report because they couldn't look past the breach of contract civil matter.

We are a start up company that is now out of over $28,000. Not the easiest thing to recover from. Other victims (including a church organization) claim losses of $2,000 - $20,000 each.

Adam

del mar, California
U.S.A.


7 Updates & Rebuttals

Ed

Portland,
Oregon,
U.S.A.
Still active

#2Consumer Comment

Mon, September 17, 2007

He's still at it. He scammed me out of doing work for three companies that had given him up front payments. I never got paid and the companies never got anything. He had promised them anything to get about $5000 per company. Even worse... he gave me a bad check. I'd called the bank before cashing it; they said the account had been closed 6 months prior. They also told me to contact the police, because he'd been running around writing bad checks. I met with him in person and confronted him about it. He actually sat across from me, looked me in the eye, and told me it was a good check and that everything would be ok... You cannot trust the guy at all.


Tim

Pasadena,
California,
U.S.A.
This guy is a fraud through and through!

#3Consumer Comment

Fri, September 08, 2006

Luckily I did not do business with him...But after finding his company and suspecting something, I had him researched and he committed a felony in CA, and was sentenced to probabtion for trying to pass off a forged check. Not a bounced check, but a check written fraudulently off of another persons account and made payable to him. I believe my source said he was arrested in El Monte, CA and went through the local court system there. Be very wary and don't trust anything this guy has to say!


Jim

Flagstaff,
Arizona,
U.S.A.
Bankruptcy court would be interested in knowing that

#4Consumer Suggestion

Tue, June 27, 2006

I bet the Bankruptcy court would be interested in knowing that you were paying him while he was in bankruptcy. I bet he didn't list any of the money you paid him and I bet you didn't get a letter from the trustee instructing you to pay the trustee instead of him. Verrrrrily interrresting.


Jim

La Canada,
California,
U.S.A.
Creative Mouse not very clever at lying

#5REBUTTAL Owner of company

Tue, June 27, 2006

What Mr. Joel Mottinger did not disclose is that his company is not a company at all. He filed for bankruptcy in August of 2005 only two days before sending our company a contract listing names phony employees who would be working on the roomq22.com project. Without telling any of our staff, he then proceeded to outsource us to an Indian company, even though we had explicitly told him that we wanted to work with a company in the United States and not in India as we already had a bad experience over there. As for the work to be completed. He detailed on the contract exactly what his team would do. They did none of the work, since he did not have a team at all. Instead, as we found out three months into the project that he had outsourced our work to India and that the team working on that project did not answer to Creative Mouse at all. While we continued to pay for "billable hours," by the developers, Mr. Mottinger refused to use that money to pay the developers, even though this was his reasoning for billing us even more than the initial $5,000 the project was projected to cost. The end result was that our company was held blackmail by the Indian company AIVEA and we had to pay there developers an additional $8,000 that Mr. Mottinger refused to pay just to get our source code back, and we did not even hire them, nor did Joel Mottinger let us know about his plans to outsource to them. Buyer beware, these piranhas are out there and Creative Mouse LLC is one of the worst. Joel is right about one thing: there are two sides to every story, but in this case, his side is not telling the truth, and we have the documents to prove it.


Jim

La Canada,
California,
U.S.A.
Creative Mouse not very clever at lying

#6REBUTTAL Owner of company

Tue, June 27, 2006

What Mr. Joel Mottinger did not disclose is that his company is not a company at all. He filed for bankruptcy in August of 2005 only two days before sending our company a contract listing names phony employees who would be working on the roomq22.com project. Without telling any of our staff, he then proceeded to outsource us to an Indian company, even though we had explicitly told him that we wanted to work with a company in the United States and not in India as we already had a bad experience over there. As for the work to be completed. He detailed on the contract exactly what his team would do. They did none of the work, since he did not have a team at all. Instead, as we found out three months into the project that he had outsourced our work to India and that the team working on that project did not answer to Creative Mouse at all. While we continued to pay for "billable hours," by the developers, Mr. Mottinger refused to use that money to pay the developers, even though this was his reasoning for billing us even more than the initial $5,000 the project was projected to cost. The end result was that our company was held blackmail by the Indian company AIVEA and we had to pay there developers an additional $8,000 that Mr. Mottinger refused to pay just to get our source code back, and we did not even hire them, nor did Joel Mottinger let us know about his plans to outsource to them. Buyer beware, these piranhas are out there and Creative Mouse LLC is one of the worst. Joel is right about one thing: there are two sides to every story, but in this case, his side is not telling the truth, and we have the documents to prove it.


Jim

La Canada,
California,
U.S.A.
Creative Mouse not very clever at lying

#7REBUTTAL Owner of company

Tue, June 27, 2006

What Mr. Joel Mottinger did not disclose is that his company is not a company at all. He filed for bankruptcy in August of 2005 only two days before sending our company a contract listing names phony employees who would be working on the roomq22.com project. Without telling any of our staff, he then proceeded to outsource us to an Indian company, even though we had explicitly told him that we wanted to work with a company in the United States and not in India as we already had a bad experience over there. As for the work to be completed. He detailed on the contract exactly what his team would do. They did none of the work, since he did not have a team at all. Instead, as we found out three months into the project that he had outsourced our work to India and that the team working on that project did not answer to Creative Mouse at all. While we continued to pay for "billable hours," by the developers, Mr. Mottinger refused to use that money to pay the developers, even though this was his reasoning for billing us even more than the initial $5,000 the project was projected to cost. The end result was that our company was held blackmail by the Indian company AIVEA and we had to pay there developers an additional $8,000 that Mr. Mottinger refused to pay just to get our source code back, and we did not even hire them, nor did Joel Mottinger let us know about his plans to outsource to them. Buyer beware, these piranhas are out there and Creative Mouse LLC is one of the worst. Joel is right about one thing: there are two sides to every story, but in this case, his side is not telling the truth, and we have the documents to prove it.


Joel

Portland,
Oregon,
U.S.A.
Two Sides To Every Story

#8REBUTTAL Individual responds

Mon, June 26, 2006

Creative Mouse inititally responded to an ad to finish the last 5% of project that had been completed in India by another group of programmers. It seemed like a fairly easy project and we began work immediately. Upon recieving the contract we began to get into some serious issues. We found out that the Client lied and misrepresented the project. No work had been done or what was done was not given to them for us to complete. We had to start from scratch. We use some outside resource from a company located in Portland Oregon to assist us in programming that went beyond our scope, they worked under our company name. The client was very difficult to work with due to their inexperience and lack of programming knoweledge. They based assumptions on input that was incorrect or invalid. We worked very hard to make this client happy and to deliver a quality product. We have been in business since 1989 and have very few complaints. We regret that there is a difference in opinion however we have references from many other clients that say the exact opposite regarding Creative Mouse.

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//