Will President Melvin Oliver, inform parent and student groups of the track record of Sandra Vasquez? Since colleges are all about limiting risk factors, hiring Sandra Vasquez shows that Pitzer is poised to undermine student & parent rights, because that's how Vasquez' rolls. When the sh***t hits the fan, their psychopath, Sandra Vasque, will dramatically become the victim of all of Vasquez's misdeeds against students. Vasquez endangers students and staff.

V.P of Student Affairs, Brian Carlisle, who unbelievable after a national search ended up with Sandra Vasquez, what will the VP do?. Ol Brian is the cat that brought the dead animal to your feet and proudly shows it off. Brian's career trajectory just took a dive, unless he has the stones to kick Sandra Vasquez to the curb.

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Prof. Jake <[email protected]>

Date: Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:17 AM

Subject: Sandra Vasquez' Criminal Cover-Up at CSUSB

To: [email protected], [email protected]

Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Greetings President Oliver, VP Carlisle, Student Body, Senate Faculty, the Board of Trustees, & Parents, 

This communication serves the interests of the student body, faculty, administration and the parents at Pitzer, UC Santa Barbara & Cal State San Bernardino. V.P. Brian Carlisle, is already aware that the VP's national search selection now exposes Pitzer to liabilities. Vasquz is named in a legal suit at UCSB for violating the Regents law and the fundamental student rights of a black male freshman. Here's what another UCSB student had to say about Vasquez. 

If CSUSB's federally mandated accredidiation agency, WASC Senior, is on their game, CSUSB's 10-year accredidation will be null & void. This will place CSUSB in a suspension limbo status, and an authenic accredidation process will see the house of cards fall. 

Just relieved of his VP position, Rong Chen, acting as WASC Liasion, defradued the federal 10-years reaccredidiation process in 2015, because Rong Chen was concurrently opertaing an academic scam at a Chinese college. While operating the cash 4 credits swap in China and illegally bringing Chinese nationals on US soil under document tamepring, international student visa fraud, wire fraud, other. Chen also concealed the Korean MA Ed. TESOL fraud and concealed two former grievnaces.

Pres. Tomas Morales with VP Student Affairs, Brian Haynes (L).

Tomas Morales is just a shell of a man. How much longer can Morales hold the fraud in place? California hired Morales from Staten Island College, just before a second vote of no confidence was coming. Morales will be out before Christmas. 

We have Haynes coverning up a formal grievnace even after the Office of the Chancellor noticed CSUSB. Haynes likes to have subordinte state female employees like Sandra Vasque, do the dirty, while Haynes hides in the shadows.  Haynes will be removed from the VP of Student Affairs by years end and he will retire in disgrace and discredited. 

Back left, Rong Chen, CEL Dean Karmanova (red), Pres. Tomas Morales, these are three key architects in the Korean MA TESOL, Vietnam MBA, Chinese Cash for Credits, swap. Looks like they are cooking up another fraud with Seoul Cyber University.

Online education widens options for students

Posted : 2016-11-16 12:34

Updated : 2016-11-16 17:08

As the WASC Senior investigation crumbles into pieces with the revelation that CSUSB WASC Liaison, Rong Chen, was concurrently operating a Chinese cash 4 credits scheme at the same time that Rong Chen was submitting doctored stated documents in 2015 to WASC Senior to fight the fraud allegations. Looks like we may go full circle. 

As we reported earlier, Rong Chen, interim Associate Provost for Academic Programs, & President Tomas Morales, were selling CSUSB credits to Chinese nationals in a scam to generate cash for credits. In their fraud scheme, Chen & Morales, had Chinese nationals taking 33 credits per semester, as reported by Chen’s & Morales’ subordinate a 28-year CSUSB employee.

Morales has now removed Chen because the fraud has been exposed and Chen represents a huge liability to the Morales administration. Back to the classroom you go, Chen, as ordered. Not to worry, Tomas Morales has your back until he does not.

Title:Professor

College:College of Arts and Letters

Department:English

Email:[email protected]

Phone:(((REDACTED)))

Office:UH 301.33

Education:Ph.D. Ball State University, Linguistics

Specialization:Linguistics

As the Sandra Vasquez crime waves rips across Southern California from San Bernardino, Santa Barbara and soon Claremont, who’s going to put an end this?

As we reported the civil & criminal acts of public officials in the California State University system and their federal overseer, Western Association of Senior Colleges, WASC Senior, we continually pondered who is behind the issues at CSU & WASC Senior.

*Is Vasquez simple a willing co conspirator?

*Is Vasquez's employment based on limiting liabilities any way possible?

*Is Vasquez’ employment based on a concealed ‘playbook’? It would make a great defense that Vasquez was simple acting on behalf of her employer, the great state of California.

As the likely psychopath arrives at Pitzer College on July 17 there is every reason now to believe that the Pitzer College Board of Trustees are clearly aware of Vasquez' expected role at Pitzer. Vasquez will continue to undermine state/federal laws and oppress students to limit the liabilities of Pitzer College. There would be no other reason to have employed Sandra Vasquez after a supposed national search took place, but Pitzer now knows, so let's see what happens.

Jason Andrew Garshfield

The Judicial Affairs process at UCSB is badly abusive of students’ basic rights. Not surprised that this happened and I’m glad that Vasquez was included in the lawsuit. I’ve heard several stories on the quiet about her violating students’ rights and using Judicial Affairs as a weapon. You can only do that for so long before it comes back to you.

nonymous

Our collective job is to not have any other students exposed to the vicious and cunning, Sandra Vasquez. Devil incarnate, barely describes Vasquez ‘joy’ and ‘excitement’ that Vasquez appears to gain through these illegal manipulations. This is why Vasque is so dangerous, Vasquez lives for the staged events and shattered lives left in the wake.

April 2017

Ottilie also said he will continue to investigate abuses of the particular code in the Regents’ laws that the university has used to keep Doe and students in similar situations from attending school.

Ottilie said new information has come out that suggests the university withheld information during the judicial process, so he also plans to amend the lawsuit to include four UCSB staff members involved in Doe’s 200-day suspension.

Included in the proposed amendment are Kristi Johnson, principal investigative analyst of the Title IX office; Margaret Klawunn, vice chancellor for student affairs; Sandra Vasquez, associate dean of judicial affairs; and Brian Quillen, also principal investigative analyst of the Title IX office.

 http://dailynexus.com/2017-04-06/embattled-students-suspension-lifted/

So much for gender equity at Cal State University. Women are significantly more likely to be the ‘face’ of fraud, civil and criminal misconduct, on campus, while the men who gave the orders are hidden and protected.

Here at the Tomas Morales administration where ol’ Tomas is being picked on because he’s Latino, Morales has no qualms with bullying/pressuring subordinate female employees to conduct themselves from simple unprofessional acts into criminal acts. Or do female employee as public officials willingly go along with the fraud to keep their pension?

The Cal State Men are the Californian Raisins. No Walnuts in this group of emasculated men.

Milton Clark’s fraud and fingerprints all over the concealment and it is well documented. But Clark, subverted two formal grievances, even after the chancellor’s office noticed and identified Clark as the responsible party. Clark likes to operate in the shadows and like his co conspirators has a huge ego and little actual accomplishments, accept full membership of the state employee welfare program. Milton Clark after subverting the grievances and lying to the Dept of Justice, then retires and is rehired as the Ombuds, at a higher salary, because that's the deal he struck with Tomas Morlaes.  Clarks is discredited.

Brian Haynes loves Brian Haynes. Still barely intact as the VP of Student Affairs, Haynes hid behind Sandra Vasquez, as he called the shots with Tomas Morales, that saw the two plotting and implementing criminal acts as a diversionary tool to conceal the academic frauds. Haynes was Sandra Vasquez’ main handler. Haynes refused to show up at the student suspension hearing after Haynes wrote the interim suspension notice. Haynes is discredited and continues employment through the entangled fraud coverup at CSUSB. 

Bodman, apparently the inertia behind the president’s vote of no confidence used the position of provost to obstruct and then conceal an investigation on an academic fraud in our master’s program.  As provost, Bodman, can decide whether to act per policy based on Bodman’s personal belief system.  Bodman needs to thank Chancellor Tim White, who offered the professional courtesy of a cover up. Student rights and CSU policy can be trampled when your name in Andrew Bodman, and you, and only you, hold the truth.

Tomas Morales displayed his ethics when Morales opted to conceal multiple academic fraud complaints and then embarked on a series of criminal acts to conceal it. Morales does not abide by the laws of the common man.  Morales has assurances that anything Morales does will not be investigated. Regardless, going back to Morales in 2012 in New York, pre CSU’ vote of no confidence; Morales is our loser, our liability, and ours to dispose of.

None of these women are aesthetically or spiritually pleasing. They all look like hardened, heartless, but not hapless beings, and for good reason; they are.

Lyn Diaz-Ricco, is of particularly low energy and vibrancy.  Ricco designed the MA TESOL So. Korean scheme. We can only assume as a Ph.D. that Ricco knew and has known that CSUSB planned to ‘sell’ the program in Korea to maintain cash paying enrollments and the very existence of the program, which has now been shipped off campus..

We already did an expose on CEL Dean Karmanova. Karmanova has concealed the MA TESOL fraud from day one. The dean’s third party suspension/expulsion inflammatory testimony that the campus police, students and a faculty member disputed, has never been made public. Karmanova is untrustworthy and no longer fit to serve as a dean.

This picture of Alysson Satterlund, speaks volumes. Looks like she sold her soul long ago. Nevertheless, Dean Satterlund knowingly facilitated two hoax student hearings, withheld information, threatened the complainant, tampered with state documents, witness tampering and intimidation. Enough said, Satterlund is peddling the “See Something, Say Something’, while simultaneously involved in a fraud coverup..

Sandra Vasquez, while facilitating a fraud with Tomas Morales and Brian Haynes, as the ethics compliance officer, quietly exited CSUSB April 8, 2016. Vasquez resurfaces at UC Santa Barbara, May 21, 2016 and UCSB just kicked Vasquez to the curb. Pitzer College, apparently unaware of the liability that Vasquez encompasses have employed Vasquez.

Vasquez’ misconduct is unbelievable from manufacturing facts, violating student confidentiality, coaching false third party witnesses, destroying/doctoring state documents, witness intimidation. Failure to attend scheduled conference calls, and failure to amend complaints and allow other students to join complaints.  Used campus police services to deceive.

We reported just a little on CSUSB ethics and compliance officer, Sandra Vasquez, to date. Let’s take a good look at Sandra Vasquez, as she stumbles out the backdoor at CSUSB into UC Santa Barbara, where Vasque is kicked to the curb after a year and takes a lesser position at Pitzer College. 

Students and parents all agreed that Sandra Vasquez, was the most dangerous person to have any position of responsibility. UC Santa Barbara, has Vasquez as a judicial officer overseeing compliance issues. Vasquez at CSU San Bernardino, commonly misinformed students of their rights, tampered with evidence, committed perjury in student hearings and wrote false and misleading state documents.  Vasquez coached others on how to sway hearings, manipulate information and protect CSU from liability

Pitzer College, VP Student Affairs, Brian Carlisle, Search Committee Chair

Pitzer College appoints Sandra Vasquez as dean of students

By City News Service

POSTED: 05/11/17, 10:22 AM PDT | UPDATED: ON 05/11/2017

0 COMMENTS

CLAREMONT >> The associate dean of students and director of judicial affairs at UC Santa Barbara will become Pitzer College’s assistant vice president for student affairs and dean of students this summer.

Sandra Vasquez will begin her position on July 17, it was announced Wednesday.

“I am truly honored and excited about this opportunity to work collaboratively with students, faculty and staff to advance student success initiatives at Pitzer,” Vasquez said.

Cal State University, hired Tomas Morales out from under a second upcoming vote of no confidence. That Faculty Senate, described the same unprofessional conduct and collusion of Tomas Morales.

The allegations that the chancellor's office & CSU Board of Trustees are corrupted is further supported through exposing Caliiforians to Tomas Morales'  destructive and illegal conduct.  Morales took the job for family reasons. 

The strong statements by trustees and the chancellor came in response to a resolution of no confidence in President Morales and CSI Provost William Fritz that won support at the CSI Faculty Senate meeting on March 22, 2012.

The resolution, backed by 31 of 54 senators, said that Morales and Fritz had “proven themselves incapable of effectively leading the College of Staten Island.” It criticized the choice and evaluation of administrators, the rejection of elected chairs of academic departments, and a failure to “provide responsible and effective leadership during the Pathways initiative.”

http://www.psc-cuny.org/clarion/june-2012/csi-president-morales-announces-departure

The resolution said that Drs. Morales and Fritz had failed to follow the spirit of shared school governance and had not provided leadership for implementation of the controversial City University of New York (CUNY) "Pathways to Degree Completion Program."

While 31 members of the 54-member Faculty Senate voted in favor of the resolution, another 37 faculty members later signed a letter slamming how the resolution was handled during the March meeting and backing Dr. Morales.

http://www.silive.com/news/index.ssf/2012/04/faculty_senate_at_college_of_s.html

One professor at Cal Poly Pomona, reacted this way to the hiring of new CS San Bernardino President Tomas Morales: "Given his circumstances (in his old job heading the College of Staten Island, N.Y.), it probably wasn't necessary to raise the pay to obtain Morales' services." The reader noted that Morales just months before his new hire received of a no-confidence vote from his former school's faculty senate.

http://archive.redding.com/opinion/tom-elias-csu-trustees-legislature-dont-get-it-ep-374939909-354269981.html

Senate Faculty Comm: New President sought;  central administration operates in secret. Compliance is valued over competence, dissent is not tolerated. No transparency, integrity and openness. President Tomas Morales’  behavior jeopardizes CSU’ mission

We, the students of Cal State San Bernardino, applaud the Senate Faculty Committee’s commitment to the values that CSU and the state of California hold dearly.

It’s much easier now for any skeptics to see the likelihood of the academic frauds and cover-ups of President Morales and other state employees that were co opted or intimidated to operate within Tomas Morales;, criminal enterprise. Through the lense of Cal State San Bernardino’s, Senate Faculty.

How much longer can CSU operate like this?

AS we reported in the Rip Off Report, titled; CSU Board of Trustees, Chancellor Tim White and General Council, Framrose Viirjee, knew of Tomas Morales', lawless conduct because they concealed a myriad of criminal acts and later, the board & chancellor appointed Morales for another tenure in 2016.

RESOLVED: that copies of this resolution be sent to Chancellor White, the Board of Trustees, the Academic Senate of the California State University, CSU campus senate chairs, Associated Students Inc. at CSUSB, and CSU President Tomás Morales.

×

1 / 3

2 / 3

3 / 3

4 / 3

❮ ❯

[email protected]

Dean Tainted Karmanova, College of Extended Learning

Let’s meet Dean Karmanova.

Imagine, your dean, a state public official lying at your hoax suspension hearing as a ruse to conceal the dean’s criminal acts of operating an international pay to play diploma scheme at Cal State San Bernardino.

Welcome to Cal State San Bernardino, College of Extended Learning.

Let us introduce, our esteemed dean, Tainted Karmanova.

Your dean tells unsubstantiated and reckless accounts of your misconduct, under an oath to tell the truth, that was a complete fabrication, because you filed two academic grievances & an Executive Order 1097 Retaliation complaint that your dean had already covered-up. The dean also covered up an informal complaint and threw you off the college's Facebook for discussing the problems in the MA TESOL program. Let's not forget Karmanova's federal financial aid & US international student visa frauds, that many American's and for profit colleges have been held accountable for.

CSU Chancellor, Tim White & General Council, Framrose Virjee, initiate a Dept of Justice investigation, after you prove the dean (& Pres. Tomas Morales) subverted complaints, then the chancellor & general council, conceal the investigative results and cover-up the dean’s gross misconduct through a false investigative narrative.

CEO Magazine ranks CSUSB MBA program among the best business schools in the world

CSUSB’s online MBA program is yet another diploma mill masked as an authentic accredited program. We have seen CSUSB & WASC, their CSU operated federally approved accreditation agency conceal the Korean MA TESOL fraud and the Chinese cash scheme for 33 semester units at a time.

Here we have the MBA fraud, with Dean Karmanova, travelling over Asia on our dime ‘selling’ our public university to foreign nationals. CEO Magazine!  Who’s pulling whose leg. CEO Magazine exposes itself for the charlatans they are.  Are students in the know or some far flung rag being spoon fed from these colleges?

Jack H. Brown (College of Business and Public Administration). Shame that Jack’s ego got the best of him as he paid out how many millions to a campus that is riddled with corruption, backslapping and favoritism. Jack’s trustees should pull any monies they can from CSUSB and make another investment.

Did Pres. Tomas Morales, pay-off CEO Mag to run this piece as pure advertising hype? Enrollments runnimg low?

If you are thinking about and MBA avoid this program. It looks like MBA’s maybe a complete waste of time and money.

Business Insider: Actually, 40 Years Of Data Show The MBA Effectively Does Nothing -- It Has No Impact

Financial Times: The MBA is losing its majic

×

1 / 0

❮ ❯

Here we have the reporting on the Cal State San Bernardino campus climate survey a year later. Compliments of the Senate Faculty; dated 17 March 2017.

We now know that Chancellor White ignored and hid an array of very serious acts of misconduct committed by Pres. Tomas Morales and Morales’ Administration. Here we have the Faculty Senate, outlining very similar misconduct and behaviors that Tomas Morales’ administration is currently involved in; this mirrors the ongoing concealment of criminal acts to hide at least three academic fraud schemes in China (selling accredited college credits), Vietnam (MBA), Korea (MA TESOL).

The Faculty Senate should deliver a death blow to Tomas Morales by conducting due diligence, exposing Morales’ illegal activity and conduct a vote of “no confidence”. It begs the question; why is the Senate Faculty playing patty cakes with Tomas Morales? It’s clear from this survey report that Morales is a miserable administrator and is running the university like a criminal enterprise.

The list of Morales false pledges, top-down governance, obstruction of policies over mission statements, micro agressions vs a sound anti bullying policy, gross failures to address deep pathologies that Tomas Morales brought with him, are still festering and CSU is facing extensive liabilities for each additional day Tomas Morales is an appointee of the Chancellor & Trustees.

Since Morales is opposed to an anti bullying policy which includes the office of the president, it begs an earlier question of how complicit Brian Haynes, Milton Clark, Andrew Bodman, Tainted Karmanova, Alysson Satterlund, Cesar Portillo, & Sandra Vasquez, were/are in the academic fraud cover up.

*Did Morales bully subordinate public officials into committing criminal offenses?

*Were Tomas Morales’ handpicked subordinates already compromised and posied to take over the university?

*Were these public officials bribed or offered some type of kickback?

*Are these public officials just willing participants in Tomas Morales’ fraud schemes?

Here’s a quick laundry list.  

• Morales admitted that ‘problems exists’ but has done nothing to mitigate them.

• No shared governance.

• Leadership unaccountable in poor campus climate survey mitigations.

• Favoritism: we have seen examples of Morales using subordinate public officials as toons & tools and then paying them off (Milton Clark as Ombuds, Brian Haynes, #2 after hoax suspension and concealing the academic fraud allegations, DHR Cesar Portillo, promoted after sabotaging an EO 1097 investigation on the Morales administration, Sandra Vasquez 'disappeared' to another CSU campus)

• Mission statement of ‘ desirable behaviours’ vs. an enforceable anti bullying policy that respects the complainant, is fair, swift and unbiased.

• “Listening Tour” Morales is completely off the rocker and discredited by now. It’s simple unbelievable and incredible that after a scathing campus climate survey that conveyed Morales governing style, Morales is now on tour to “listen” after over four years on the campus.

• No open town meeting since the campus climate survey last year Morales has been in the bunker right after the Chancellor & Trustees “gave” Morales a second term.

• Budget transparency. We know that Morales had state/federal reporting requirements over the illicitly gained money through the frauds. An EO 1104,(financial irregularities) was filed with the Chancellor/Trustees, state controller's office that CSU buried.

×

1 / 11

2 / 11

3 / 11

4 / 11

5 / 11

6 / 11

7 / 11

8 / 11

9 / 11

10 / 11

11 / 11

12 / 11

❮ ❯

We need to take a much closer look at Dean Alysson Satterlund and the dean’s connection to concealing the academic and financial fraud. Make no mistakes about it, Alysson Satterlund played a significant role in toppling the Formal Grievance procedure and disemboweling the interim suspension hearing that Alysson Satterlund assured went to full suspension mode, as planned.

Dean Satterlund was appointed to oversee the suspension hearing because Satterlund had just arrived on the campus and was not accused of having previously acted unprofessionally and, we were assured that Satterlund was unbiased.

What about Satterlund’s ethics and trustability?

Alysson Satterlund would have been coached by Sandra Vasquez, who later was ‘disappeared’ off the campus by Tomas Morales. The hearing was fully scripted and rigid. Satterlund was defensive, cold and controlling. Satterlund made multiple threats to end the hearing and remove this student if I whispered a word of the diploma mill complaints and the concealed formal grievances (which was the factual basis of the suspension). The August 7, 2014, suspension was issued by Brian Haynes, who had just shook down the HR investigator that was investigating Haynes, Milton Clark, Andrew Bodman and Tomas Morales for concealing the formal grievances.

Haynes was under an EO 1097 retaliation investigation when he suspended this student for what later was revealed by campus police, a faculty member, and a student as completely false accusations. They were so false and contrived that Satterlund created a deception of threats, fake witnesses and concealed facts to conceal the academic fraud that is still going on. Satterlund edits the transcripts for over five months concealing the threats and lies after stating they would be available in 20-business days.

The Morales administration was counting on this new comer from Dartmouth, Alysson Satterlund, to maintain the fraud and continue retaliating and harassing this student for filing the grievances. Satterlund’s offenses are incriminating. We can see that Satterlund has no investment in the well being, safety or academic success of students.

The staged hoax suspension hearing wasn’t enough for Satterlund. Two months later, Satterlund convenes an expulsion hearing (Nov. 2014) and in order for this farce to work, Satterlund ignored all the facts in the suspension hearing with Tainted Karmanova and Sandra Vasquez, repeating the same lies as earlier that were proven falsehoods, while Satterlund cheered them on and facilitated this fraud. The Chancellor’s Office covered up Satterlund’s misdeeds but Morales indoctrinated another gang member or maybe that’s how they roll at Dartmouth.

Satterlund needs to be kicked to the curb like the rest of the gang. In the meantime, fellow students, avoid Satterlund at all expense.

Satterlund’s message to unwitting students.

Welcome to CSUSB! We are so glad to have you as a member of the Coyote Family.

As you explore our website, we hope that you will find helpful information that will assist you in navigating our beautiful campus, its services and opportunities for your engagement with clubs, recreation, and student success resources. You may also find useful links to a number of programs and services offered through other Student Affairs departments.

The Dean of Students Office is here to ensure students’ safety and well-being as well as provide, in partnership with our student community and colleagues, meaningful experiences in and outside of the classroom.

Please know we are committed to your personal and intellectual growth whether you live on campus or commute to CSUSB for evening classes, we are here to help you make the most of your CSUSB experience. With this in mind, if you have an idea to improve CSUSB (resign Satterlund) or have a question about how to get connected to programs, activities or events, we would love to hear from you.

Go ‘Yotes!

Alysson Satterlund, Ph.D.

Associate Vice President & Dean of Students

Email: [email protected]

The Morales Administration & the Culprits that are concealing academic and financial frauds. From the President's Office, Provost, V.P. Student Affairs, Assoc. Dean of Students, Ethics Compliance Officer, Dean of the College of Extended Learing, WASC Liason, campus police dept.. 

Every procedural process steeped in California law and California State University, laws and ethos were violated.

MA TESOL candidate, Jake Wallace, set to graduate in 2015, but suspended and attacked for filing fraud allegations at Cal State San Bernardino. Academic status is in Limbo with mounting fradulent debt.

Tomas Morales' misconduct on the campus is now legendary. Morales entangled an array of subordinate public, WASC & CHEA officials and state police officers into Morales' fraud scheme. Morales has no moral GPS, there's an evidentary trail showing an array of criminal acts that most citizen's would be held accountable for. The campus is unsafe for any sudents, faculty and the public, until Morales is removed.

V.P of Student Affairs, Brian Haynes aka as Pres. Morales' right hand man and #2 on the campus is a major player in the hoax suspension and fraud cover up. Haynes is a a narcissist and arrogant man, which allows Morales to play him.

Milton Clark's like a woollymammoth. Clark's been gourging at the public trough all his life. Clark's a great example of a public official who's off his chain and accountable to no one. Clark conceals the formal grievances (Feb 2014) retires and Morales appoints him ombuds at a higher salary. Bribes, payoffs anyone?

Assoc. V.P Dean of Students, Alysson Satterlund, joined CSUSB from Dartmouth College in 2014. Satterlund fresh off the plane, embarked in a series of frauds starting with overseeing the hoax suspension August 2014, hearing; witness intimidation, witness tampering, state records document tampering, concealing criminal evidence, threatening this student for discussing the fraud allegations, knowingly allowing false testimony, ignoring sworn peace officer testimony. Satterlund is ruthless and oversaw a Nov 2014, hoax expulsion hearing. Satterlund ignored prior testimony from officers, colluded with Vasquez and Karmanova and repeated acts as described. 

Bodman is another arrogant professor and a Pommie to boot. Bodman stated to me he wouldn't follow the CSU formal grievnace provedures as Provost because Bodman simple did not believe the allegations. Bodman was mandated to follow procedure but the mighty Provost failed us. The DOJ and Chancellor's Office concealed Bodman's misconduct. At CSUSB all a student needs is a nut job like Bodman, who by the way, Morales later kicked to the curb.

Ethics Compliance Officer, Sandra Vasquz is evil incarnate. Vasquez's misconduct and criminal acts were so obvious and undeniable that Morales disappears Vasquez. Vasquez is quietly coexisting on another CSU campus. 

CSUSB WASC Liason, Rong Chen, is involved in a littany of wrongdoing that goes to the core of the cover up. Chen concealed the Korean fraud with WASC (see WASC ROR link) Senior and CHEA through audit and academic state records fraud. Chen was outed in July 2016, for masterminding the China fraud with Tomas Morales, via another state employee. The China fraud included fake transcripts, inflated credits, and wire fraud.

College of Extended Learning, Dean Taintia Karmanova (think Tainted) embarked on a massive cover up of the Dean's Korean MA TESOL fraud. The fraud started with blocking students from discussing it, patently false and libalous testimony in the hoax suspension/expulsion hearings. State records document tampering, misuse of the CSU name/trademark for personal profit, wire fraud, student visa fraud, collusion, giving false testimony to the DOJ. The Tainted One is also operating a MBA fraud in Vietnam.

Below was a solicted final summary from California Attorney, DOJ, General Kamala Harris. Harris had no record of holding public officials accountable. 

1

Feb. 11. 2015

EO 1097

RE: AG email Feb 10, 2015; Requested Examples of Retaliation_Haynes/Karmanova

1. Adverse Action means an action that has a substantial and material adverse effect on the Complainant's ability to participate in a University program or activity free from Discrimination, Harassment or Retaliation, as those terms are defined below. Minor or trivial actions or conduct not reasonably likely to do more than anger or upset a Complainant does not constitute an Adverse Action.

The acts of the actors, Brian Haynes, Sandra Vasquez, Tainta Karmanova, Andrew Bodman, Tomas Morales, Milton Clark, DiazRico

and later, Allyson Satterlund and Cesar Portillo,

(acting as President, Vice President of Student Affairs, Student Conduct and Ethics Officer, Provost Office, College of Education, College of Extended Learning, Dean of Students, appointed formal grievance officer, HR, and other) coordinated themselves through an agreement and intent to engage in acts, which subverted and minimized policies, procedures and executive orders to conceal the allegations that the CSUSB CEL was/is allegedly

habitually admitting unqualified MA TESOL applicants from South Korea.

Through an academic and financial fraud to enrich themselves through the abuse of public resources, the actors abused their public positions of trust and power to initiate and maintain these subversive retaliatory acts. As a result, the intention of subversive, retaliatory and criminal acts increased and this resulted in danger and material damage to this graduate student.

There were and are ongoing substantial and material adverse effects on this graduate student for filing the informal and formal grievances, the retaliation complaints and being subjected to an interim suspension, and later, a staged interim suspension hearing, for filing complaints over an alleged financial and academic fraud that has never been investigated.

Even if Morales had the luxury of not being aware of the potential fraud. From 2013/14 , onwards, Morales should have known that the program was ineligible as CSUSB is/was allegedly in violation of their WASC accreditation. CSUSB President Morales’ knowledge of the fraud is apparent as the key prominent actor in concealing the academic and financial fraud

allegations through cojoining and authorizing subversive retaliatory acts through appointed and/or employed actor subordinates like Milton Clark, Haynes and Karmanova, and through Vasquez, who works under Haynes and thorough the interim HR (Portillo) and dean of students (Satterlund).

Wallace EO 1098 February 11, 2015: Response to EO Questions.

2

1

In 2012, CSUSB President Morales, lobbied the US Department of Education for access to student federal loans for the MA TESOL program. Morales had to assure federal officials that the program was accredited and met stringent requirements for federal student loan dollars. Morales either knew or should have known that CSUSB was defrauding the US Department of Education and each and every graduate student that received said federal financial aid and

enrolled in that program. If Morales did not know in 2012, the president certainly knew in 2013/14, as the president’s subordinates scrambled through subversive retaliatory acts to conceal the fraud allegations with Morales’ knowledge of the allegations, first hand.

The receipt of federal financial aid was an inadvertent federal offense and an adverse and material act, as this graduate student would have had no idea that the MA TESOL program through a publicly funded California state university was admitting unqualified candidates from South Korea. And that all attempts to address it through California State University, policies,

procedures and executive orders, would result in retaliatory acts and the failure of University officials to act within the scope of their positions as public employees.

The actors not only retaliated through subverting the informal and the CSU formal grievance procedure, but the actors also issued an April 29, 2014, directive signed by Haynes’ subordinate, Vasquez. As this student placed calls to the Office of the President, Provost Office, Ombuds Office, Student Affairs Office, to report that the actors were subverting two

formal grievances, the actors then, through a written non descriptive directive banned this graduate student from contacting said actors (themselves) as the student’s calls exposed the subversive and retaliatory acts of the actors to subordinate staff.

The retaliatory directive was written after the actors had failed to comply with the CSU formal grievance procedure. A March 2014, letter from associate vice chancellor, John Swarbrick, documented that CSUSB had an active grievance procedure and that Milton Clark was the CSUSB personnel responsible. With 30days remaining to address the two formal grievances the actors

wantonly with complete disregard of their positions and CSU policies and executive orders, ignored the chancellor's letter and maintained the retaliation through the intentional failure to follow the procedural processes with the grievance procedure and then cooperatively issued the April directive to muzzle the student from blowing the whistle. The overt acts were

subverting the chancellors informational letter, subverting the grievances, and issuing the April directive to further the concealment of the underlying allegations of the academic and

financial fraud.

1

Wallace EO 1098 February 11, 2015: Response to EO Questions.

3

This graduate student then filed a retaliation complaint against said actors for subverting the grievances and issuing the directive (EO 1097: April 2014). The actors with full control and powers of the University, and through an overt act to maintain prior subversive and retaliatory acts refused to allow a neutral party off of the CSUSB campus to facilitate the retaliation investigation. The actors appointed a subordinate interim human resources director to

investigation with the prior knowledge that the actors would control and subvert that retaliation investigation through the furtherance of additional retaliatory acts, coercion and subversion of Executive Order 1097.

This subordinate stated in writing that HR was capable of conducting said retaliation investigation but HR sabotages the investigation after HR offers a resolution without any details. This graduate students resolution to HR is to ensure CSUSB would investigate the two formal grievances of which, HR assured would take place earlier in the investigation (because “they have too”). HR’s findings reported that CSUSB had conducted the grievance

investigation but HR failed to produce those findings (August 2014). HR at some point in the retaliation investigation starts to subvert and misrepresent the facts. Then, in a confidential August 6, 2014, phone call, HR violated the confidentiality of the call and contacted the very actors that HR was investigating under Executive Order 1097, to report allegations that have

since been revealed through testimony to be manufactured by said actors in that this graduatestudent was falsely accused of stating a “showdown”

 and the “f**kyou, Vasquez, in the continuum of retaliatory acts to undermine this graduate student and conceal the fraud allegations.

The actors under a thwarted Executive Order 1097 retaliation investigation then issued an August 7th, 2014, interim suspension (Executive Order 1098) based on misrepresenting what HR reported to the actors, which was another in an ongoing series of retaliatory acts to conceal prior retaliatory and subversive acts and the underlying allegations of the financial

fraud. The actors then staged an August 25, 2014, IS hearing and shielded one another through allowing select actors who were unable to offer anything beyond revolving scripted hearsay testimony and concealed access to the actual accusers who were never identified; and concealed access to University staff, faculty and other MA TESOL graduate students, that had first hand knowledge that would expose the actors subversive acts and disregard for

the facts.

The actors played triple subversive and retaliatory roles of, first, setting up and staging the alleged incidents (accusers), second, they then took punitive administrative acts (policy, EO, implementers), and third, retaliated and punished, suspended, this graduate student in the absence of any check and balances and any neutral oversight (trier of the facts). The actors violated EO 1098 through issuing a hearing notice 2.1 days prior to the hearing. The testifying actors (Vasquez and Karmanova) had been earlier accused of

Wallace EO 1098 February 11, 2015: Response to EO Questions.

4

retaliation through the concealment of the grievances and subverting an amended complaint with Robert Green, which was never investigated.

The actors ( Morales, Haynes, Satterlund, Vasquez, Karmanova) had full control of the IS hearing and (Bodman, Milton Clark, Haynes, Diaz, Vasquez and Karmanova) earlier controlled and concealed the informal and formal grievances. The IS hearing was an overt act to control the factual narrative and to assure that prior retaliatory acts, while committing new retaliatory acts, were concealed and that this graduate student was punished for exposing CSUSB’s ATM.

In furtherance of the agreement, the actors retained the August 25th transcripts for over five months after testimony that the audio record would be released in 20 business days with the findings (Satterlund). The actors then tampered with the August 25, 2014, audio recording and transcripts. The tampering of the transcripts included the alteration of the testimony of HR

with regard to the f**k you, Vasquez showdown’ allegations and the testimony of the ethics development officer (Vasquez) who took a call from the CSUSB police during testimony to report that this student was physically outside her campus office at that time.

HR’s testimony  flip flops from August to the November, 2014, hearing and shows gross inconsistencies. HR’s August 25th testimony and those transcripts have been altered. The audio record file’s chain of custody should have been hearing officer, Wallace and Dean Douglas Freer. The IS hearing coordinator (Satterlund) concealed prior testimony in the August 2014, hearing and maintains a false narrative as the hearing coordinator in the November hearing acting on behalf of all actors and identical to Karmanova and Vasquez’s ever expanding narrative. The roles of the actors are maintained and never switched in furtherance of the agreement to

place University policies on their head, retaliate against this graduate student and conceal the underlying fraud allegations.

This false hearsay testimony of Vasquez and Karmanova conflicts with the testimony of actual firsthand witnesses to include a CSUSB police officer, HR, a faculty member (November 2014) and another MA TESOL graduate student in the August 2014, hearing. The CEL dean (Karmanova) retaliated through coordinating with the other actors in the subversion of the informal and formal grievances with Vasquez, Haynes, Bodman, Clark and

Morales.

The dean’s hearsay testimony is in opposition of the testimony of credible witnesses and the evidence of two CSUSB police officers, HR and colleagues, and later is in opposition of a faculty member (Turpin) under Karmanova, in the November hearing. That faculty member is not called in as an August 25th witness as requested. Karmanova regurgitates the falsely proven narrative in August, again in November, to retaliate against me for attempting

Wallace EO 1098 February 11, 2015: Response to EO Questions.

5

to expose Karmaova’s alleged illegal operations on the University with the other actors. Turpin also violated a Vasquez verbal directive to call the CSUSB police if this graduate student was on campus.

Note: Sandra Vasquez, assumes the role of being the primary victim of this graduate students allegations of threats. Vasquez, was never targeted nor did this graduate student ever see Vasquez as the primary focus or key offender. Vasquez was another actor in the fraud and retaliation and no more significant than Haynes, Karmanova, Bodman or DiazRico, for example.

CSUSB President Tomas Morales, has always been the primary focus of these issues. Morales is solely responsible for what takes place at the University and the sound implementation of executive orders and policies. Virtually all calls were made to the Office of the President and not the Student Affairs Office or the College of Extended Learning, with the exception of the Ombuds Office, much earlier on. Vasquez captured the role of the primary victim proven through testimony transcripts in the August 25, 2014, hearing where Vasquez had electronic and telephonic contact with HR Portillo on August 6, 2014, based on the testimony of Vasquez. Again, at that time, Vasquez was under an Executive Order 1097 retaliation investigation through HR.

This is a crucial distinguishing fact. Because Vasquez testified and makes it abundantly clear how fearful she was with their building on “lockdown”

and a police presence via Morales.

Vasquez claimed she received an August 25, 2014, phone call from the CSUSB police while testifying. Vasquez stated I was outside Vasquez’ campus office when I was in Northern California this fact has been concealed through the tampering of the transcripts. And that this graduate student is the most dangerous person Vasquez has ever encountered. Vasquez

has every right to feel threatened because Vasquez actions are actionable and exposes criminal offenses, if the system took action and actually worked.

Vasquez stated fears are a ruse to ruin my education and wellbeing because the actors careers and wellbeing are more important. The financial and academic fraud is the smoking gun.Vasquez dramatized the alleged threats but cannot be specific nor does Vasquez offer any witnesses or written evidence to prove Vasquez’ production. Vasquez’ reliance on that false

narrative is based on Vasquez’s position as the “Student Conduct and Ethics Development Officer” and that Vasquez is beyond reproach and that President Morales is enabling Vasquez. Vasquez assumed the primary victim role to protect Morales and the other actors and control the “facts.”

Director of Human Resources, Cesar Portillo.  Morales promoted Portillo from interim after Portillo assisted Morales in a log list of offenses to conceal the frauds. Portillo botched an EO 1097 investigation on Morales and subordinates by colluding with the parties that Portillo was investigating. Portillo worked with Morales, Milton Clark, Brian Haynes & Andrew Bodman, to conceal the grievances.

Just a nasty inconsiderate player on the campus. fockers csusb

We know from a longtime CSUSB employee (June 2016) that WASC liason, Rong Chen & Pres. Tomas Morales, cooked up a mighty academic fraud with Chinese nationals. That fraud included accepting fraudlent transcripts, student visa fraud, 33 credits earned per semester, and wire fraud. Unidentified Chinese agents are calling the shots & Tomas Morales is being gifted like below.

Tomas Morales refused to meet with a group of graduate students over our Korean MA TESOL fraud allegations but here he is accepting gifts from Chinese students.

March 24, 2017

CSUSB Chinese Student Association presents president with gift in gratitude of his support

 

Cal State San Bernardino President Tomás D. Morales welcomed several impromptu visitors to his office on March 24 when members of the CSUSB Chinese Student Association presented him with a gift in appreciation of his ongoing support of the club and this year’s Chinese New Year celebration last month.

“Thank you for your support. Thank you for attending our Chinese festival and thank you for your support of Chinese programs,” said Jingjing Li, the club’s president. “Chinese students think CSUSB is very comfortable and we tell our friends in China who also want to join CSUSB.”

The recent appointment of Ms. Carthen is a Red Flag on the field and another reason to not enroll at CSUSB. The ombuds office is a crucial first point of contact for most students if they have any problems on the campus. Here's why it is frightening and not shocking that a complete insider would be appointed. Regardless of Carthen's qualifications her most important qualification would be a sworn oath to Tomas Morales to conceal illegal activity, misguide students, tamper out any hornets nests and assure no blood spatter on the Morales administration. The Morales ombuds office is to gatekeep information and dis empower students. 

CSUSB officials to speak at African American churches as part of CSU Super Sunday outreach

FACULTY AND STAFF, NEWS RELEASES, STUDENTS February 6, 2017, by Office of Strategic Communication0 Comment

CSUSB officials to speak at African American churches as part of CSU Super Sunday outreach

FACULTY AND STAFF, NEWS RELEASES, STUDENTS February 6, 2017, by Office of Strategic Communication0 Comment

Senate faculty Committee: 

"Maintaining Academic Quality and Integrity" their mission statement. "The Senate will continue to address polices on retention, promotion, and tenure, curriculum, budgeting, graduate education.  The faculty Senate is mandated to invesigate the diploma mill allegations but they won't follow procedure. This is a common thread through the administration and faculty at CSUSB and another reason to avoid this campus. 

Office of the President:

President Tomas Morales, as evidenced through documentation from the Chancellor's office, the DOJ investigation and the WASC accredidation and compliance investigation, Morales has sullied the CSUSB campus, toppled federal/state laws and is operating and concealing international frauds that private universities have been held accountable for. Morales is so devoid of sound ethics, integrity and goodwill that Morales endangers the faculty, students and his direct subordinates each day he sits on that throne. 

Office of the Chancellor:

The second Chinese nationals diploma mill (operated by CSUSB WASC Liason, Rong Chen & President Tomas Morales) surfaces in June 2016, well after the chancellor, WASC/CHEA and CSUSB concealed the Korean diploma mill. That international fraud is also being concealed. 

Chancellor Tim White and subordinates accepted the fact that Tomas Morales had corrupted the fraud investigations and ushers in the DOJ (September 2014-April 2015). Tim White never releases the DOJ investigation and the chancellor investigtaive results are inaccurate, deceptive, patently false, superficial, and conceal the criminala acts orchastarted by Tomas Morales. We can see this in Vice Chancellor John Swarbricks' letter (March 2014-posted on the CSU ROR link) through the concealment of the grievance procedure complaints that started at CSUSB, then, WASC/CHEA concealed it, next, the chancellor's office concealed it. Then, later, WASC aka CSU (posted on this site) claimed that CSUSB & the chancellor have functional complaint procedures, which was another blatant falsehood.

The chancellor then corruots the appeals process through subordinate Vice Chancellor Mark Crase. That fraud will be posted on the CSU link. 

Director of Human Resources: 

Ceasr Portillo, stated he was threatend and intimidated to subvert the investigation on Morales and subordinates. Portillo is a malable moralless imp and that's why Tomas Morales appointed him. This is a common theme in the moralless Morales administration, the bevy of public officials who act recklessly.

Forwarded message ----------

From: Prof.>[email protected]

Date: Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:20 AM

Subject: Fwd: EO 1140: Fiscal Improprieties: CSUSB

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Jack Paduntin <[email protected]>, Tatiana Karmanova <[email protected]>, Changhee Song <[email protected]>, Brian Haynes <[email protected]>, Elisabeth Frater <[email protected]>, Sandra Vasquez <[email protected]>, "Alysson M. Satterlund" <[email protected]>, "Swarbrick, John" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, TESOL programs at CSUSB <[email protected]>, Andrew Bodman <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Mark Groen <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Nena Torrez <[email protected]>, [email protected], Amanda Herzog <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Milton Clark <[email protected]>

At this point, Tomas Morales, should immediately go out on paid leave to stop the destruction of material evidence and influence peddling. The faculty could report him to the campus police post haste for criminal allegations or to state police.  We know the president will not act with regard to CSU. How many state employees has the president's office entangled? How much longer will the office of the president be used in such a manner? When will the faculty senate rise above, stand tall and implement its mandate?

When CSUSB President Tomas Morales has free time from staging student suspenions, altering suspension hearing transcripts, witness intimidation, concealing WASC investigations and controlling internal criminal investigations on his administration; he's using students as pawns to create diversionary racial tactics. 

Dear Colleagues,

As I have been going through the retirement process—and it is quite a process—I have been drawn to think about the past twenty-six years and what I have been trying to do here.  The answer, I think, is trying to help students become better citizens of this great country of ours.

I am doubtless influenced in this belief by Thomas Jefferson, who devoted his final years to founding the University of Virginia, where I earned my doctoral degree.  Jefferson wrote, “I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society, but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is, not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education.  This is the true corrective of abuses of . . . power” (1820).  Jefferson wrote in another letter, “If the nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was & never will be” (1816).   It did indeed take far too long for this country to include non-whites and women in this vision, and we still, admittedly, have a long way to go to make our universities truly open to all.

But the original purpose has not changed—to provide our students with the education they need to be good citizens in a democratic republic.  That is the thinking behind the so-called “Golden Four” General Education requirements—algebra, oral communication, written communication, and critical thinking.  These skills are especially in need today when so much of our political discourse rejects any effort at genuine communication with other citizens, but attempts chiefly to disarm their critical faculties and thus gain easy acceptance.  We must try to teach our students not to accept fallacious, incendiary discourse, and to resist the temptation to practice it themselves. We must try to teach our students honestly to engage with those with whom they have disagreements, rather than simply to assume that anyone who disagrees them with is just plain wrong.   We must try to teach our students that it is not enough merely to assert one’s own opinion as forcefully as possible--on social media, from a lectern, at a press conference, or elsewhere--without first subjecting that opinion to critical analysis.  This is what, I believe, the vast majority of the faculty here attempt, day in and day out, to do.

We have not always succeeded, unfortunately, as was demonstrated just yesterday by a “press conference” where a number of our students attacked faculty and their representatives.  The ignorance and incoherence of the charges aired were disturbing enough.  For example, they claimed that there have been “racist” attacks on Dr. Morales because he is a Latino.  First, I am completely unaware of any attacks on Dr. Morales because he is a Latino.  But even if there had been, the attacks could not be “racist” by definition, since “Latino” is not a racial category: Latinos belong to many races.  (I am treating “Latino” and “Hispanic” as synonyms, though some distinguish the two and would describe Dr. Morales as “Hispanic” rather than “Latino.”)  The point is that students were not expressing genuine student concerns.  They had been coopted somehow into participating in an attempt to distract attention away from a professionally produced faculty report that had used data rather than insinuation to determine the status of the morale of faculty and staff on this campus.

But what I found most profoundly distressing in the newspaper article about the event was the photograph of bright, attractive students holding up signs for what I can only assume is a front organization, #studentssupportpresidentmorales.  Our students deserve better than to be used as pawns in an intramural quarrel among administrators, faculty, and staff. 

Therefore, if a retiring faculty member may be allowed to make a final plea, mine is that faculty and administrators renew their commitment to modeling and teaching good citizenship to our students.  Jobs change and transform over the years, but the principles of democratic self-governance must be preserved intact if our nation is to endure.

Ted

Treadwell Ruml

Professor of English and Faculty Senate Chair

California State University, San Bernardino

5500 University Parkway

San Bernardino, CA 92407

At the time of the chancellor's letter alerting CSUSB of thier official duties 30-days remained on the clock for Tomas Morales to abide by the grievance procedure process. Morales then implements a series of subversive actions.

Cal State San Bernardino ignored the CSU chancellor's office who formally called attention to CSUSB's requirements to implement the CSU systemwide grievance procedure. Later, the chancellor's office 'forgot' those requirements and failed to cite the complete failure and cover-up of the diploma mill allegations in the filtered Calif Department of Justice's civil investigation completed in March 2015.

Milton Clark ignored the chancellor's office and thus the procedure.  Clark effectively concealed those allegations and was later, after retirement, appointed the Ombuds position, which was elevated to a VP position thereby becoming a certified double dipping gatekeeper. If you'd ever worked with Milton Clark, it would become evident that incompetence is rewarded in the Morales administration.

a:!ffl The California State University

×

1 / 1

2 / 1

❮ ❯

Compelling evidence that CSUSB President Tomas Morales is behind at least two academic frauds on this public campus. Morales orchastrated the Korean diploma mill cover up through a series of remakable actions that exposed the university and subordinates to  liabilities. 

Here we have the CSUSB WASC Senior campus liason being accused of an incredible scheme that would involve a littany of federal offeness like wire fraud, issuing false student visas and 'selling' CSU to foreign nationals.

vvvTue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:59 AM

To: Rong Chen <RChenxxx

Cc: campus <[email protected]>

Hi Ron,

I was privileged and honored to spend 29+ year of my life at CSUSB. It is time for me to close the CSUSB chapter and step into my retirement. I will eternally be grateful for the opportunities and experiences I have had at CSUSB and will always appreciate the wonderful family at CSUSB that have been a part of this journey with me. I truly treasure the incredible people I have worked with; whose integrity, hard work, dedication, commitment, and caring spirits have enriched student’s lives, as well as mine.

There have been some very unpleasant days, if any; as I tried to do my part to positively impact CSUSB and the students we serve.

With that being said, I certainly feel guilty for leaving my team and CSUSB without finding the truth about your academic integrity. Under your leadership, CSUSB has become the degree mills for international students from China. Instead of working with IA team, you chose to work with Chinese agents; accepts agent’s recommendation for admission, demands IA to accept questionable academic records submitted by Xiwen Zhang (reference Liberian), and recruit/accept non-University Chinese students to CSUSB. I have tried so hard to stop the unethical admission practice that you and Xiwen have bestowed upon us and had a hope that I will prevent CSUSB from “Chinese students cheating their way into the American university” status. Where is the integrity?

I read President Morales’ e-mail dated 5/11/2016, in regards to the Campus Climate Survey.  I did not participate in the survey, but I wish I did. It is never too late. This is the reason I send this e-mail to you and the CSUSB family. There is clear evidence that you are so focused on attracting Chinese students (#where the money is) that you and Xiwen cut corners to build the international enrollments. One of the best examples is the 2+2 program you and Xiwen encouraged Dr. Morales to endorse his name on the agreement with Overseas Education School. This school is set up by the Chinese agent supposedly on the grounds of the Soochow University. It is in charge of its own admission, finances, teaching and administration, yet the students are not eligible to transfer from this program to Soochow University. In addition, their transcripts come in many shapes and sizes. CSUSB has a 1+2+1 agreement with Soochow University. The transcript format and seal are totally different than the 2+2 program. President Morales was invited to visit Soochow University last August. Did you tell him the truth about this 2+2 program?

Based on the Campus Climate Survey, President Morales is committed to addressing many issues in a “thoughtful and transparent way.”  I hope he will take some time to have a one-on-one interview with the 2+2 students. Also, he needs to interview the people who were involved with the 2+2 agreement, such as: Dr. Rowena Santiago. She had a face-to-face conversation with the Chinese agent about the background of those students. The agent told Dr. Santiago: Those students are not Soochow University’s students and their coursework (over 100 baccalaureate units) cannot be transferred to the Soochow University.

The new group of students (total of 33) is coming for the fall 2016; they are currently enrolled in 30 semester units at this “tailor-made program for CSUSB” in China. IA team asked you to find out the reason for taking excessive course overload. Instead of sending our question to the Department Chair (business administration) for an explanation, you sent the question to the agent. Here is the answer you received from the agent and then forwarded to IA: “Those students have nothing to do, and decided to take more courses.” Wow.

Although I retired, I cannot leave without telling the CSUSB family all the money-making business you and Xiwen have made through Chinese agents.

The new group of students (total of 33) is coming for the fall 2016; they are currently enrolled in 30 semester units at this “tailor-made program for CSUSB” in China. IA team asked you to find out the reason for taking excessive course overload. Instead of sending our question to the Department Chair (business administration) for an explanation, you sent the question to the agent. Here is the answer you received from the agent and then forwarded to IA: “Those students have nothing to do, and decided to take more courses.” Wow.

Although I retired, I cannot leave without telling the CSUSB family all the money-making business you and Xiwen have made through Chinese agents.

-Cxxx

The issue isn’t about race & culture and that Koreans do or do not deserve an education. You have every right to agree that foreign nationals can enter US territories on an illegal visa, be admitted through a backdoor admissions process and that CSUSB can defraud California State University policies, procedures, wire fraud, violate the law, accreditation that authorizes FSA, and that makes the degrees worthless, but I  would have to disagree with you.

Cal State San Bernadrino is a publicly funded university, federal student aid (FSA) is aso funded through taxes. President Tomas Morales, VP of Student Affairs, Brian Haynes, Ombuds, Milton Clark and my dean, Taintia Karmonova, are ‘selling’ our public university to cash paying Koreans who are academically unqualified to attend in a scheme. My receipt of FSA is a felony under 20 U.S.C 1097, I am obligated to report or I am willfully participating in the fraud.

"Unfortunately, a few unscrupulous individuals view Title IV Federal Student Assistance funding as a way to line their own pockets—not to get an education. According to a recent assessment by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General, the number of aid recipients potentially taking part in criminal fraud rings is increasing".

fbi.gov/news/stories/investigating-student-aid-fraud-2

 What does any part of what you posted have to do with tea in Korea?? What it sounds like is youre scared or a biggot. Probably both. So what if they are from SOUTH KOREA! So what if they dont have a great grasp of the english tounge. THEY WILL LEARN! Face it if they have a BA and want to get a masters they MUST end up coming to the states. Your complaint reads as if a white supremist wrote it. OOOO the BAD KOREANS! THEY are going to get a masters! That probably wont matter what so ever as they go forward in thier life. Im sure if YOU learned thier tounge that YOU would have a better understanding of what THEY have to go through. I appluad ANY person who seeks to better themselves through education, more so when its a visitor to our country. It REALLY sounds like YOU have the problem. YOU have exactly ZERO idea of these ppls education and YOU should be ashamed.

I am not here to rebutte your posting but, more to discuss it. The MA TESOL, MBA and another with Chinese students is a hybrid online program with some classes on the CSUSB campus.  I can bear witness to  the percentage of Koreans in the master's program I am now enrolled in. That program was set up in 2009, and marketed to Koreans in Korea. What we learned was that at least 80% of the Korean enrollement were not academically suited for a MA program in English. In know way does this questions their intelligence, it's just that CSUSB had a backdoor admissions process for these cash paying students. The Koreans were to leap frog from their BA from Korea into an MA in English. 

You may find newspaper, Youtube & Facebook postings if you look. CSUSB has never investigated the diploma mill accusations, they opted for a diversionary tactic that ended up exposing their antics but even after that they attempted to cover it up through suspension hearing transcript tampering, witness intimidation and third party testiminy w/o documentation. It was a circus orchastarted through the office of the president, Tomas Morales. CSUSB has tremendous powers and resources.

sbsun.com/social-affairs/20160616/csusb-student-protesters-faculty-attacks-on-president-are-racist

Below is a narrative to the state attorney general's office, civil division. We have Kamila Harris on record discussing the harm of diploma mills and her staffers who condcuted a civil investigation on behalf of the chancellor's office, after I pleaded for help, that has never been released to the public. It was barely disclosed that the president's # 2, Brian Hayes, suspended me at the same time that he, the president and others were under an EO 1097 investigation for corrupting the diploma mill complaints. 

Feb. 11. 2015

EO 1097

RE: Attorney General  email Feb 10, 2015; Requested Examples of Retaliation_Haynes/Karmanova

Adverse Action​means an action that has a substantial and material adverse effect on the Complainant's ability to participate in a University program or activity free from Discrimination, Harassment or Retaliation, as those terms are defined below. Minor or trivial actions or conduct not reasonably likely to do more than anger or upset a Complainant does not constitute an Adverse Action.

The acts of the actors, Brian Haynes, Sandra Vasquez, Tainta Karmanova, Andrew Bodman, Tomas Morales, Milton Clark, Diaz­Rico and later, Allyson Satterlund and Cesar Portillo, (acting as President, Vice President of Student Affairs, Student Conduct and Ethics Officer, Provost Office, College of Education, College of Extended Learning, Dean of Students, appointed formal grievance officer, HR, and other) coordinated themselves through an agreement and intent to engage in acts, which subverted and minimized policies, procedures and executive orders to conceal the allegations that the CSUSB CEL was/is allegedly habitually admitting unqualified MA TESOL applicants from South Korea. Through an academic and financial fraud to enrich themselves through the abuse of public resources, the actors abused their public positions of trust and power to initiate and maintain these subversive retaliatory acts. As a result, the intention of subversive, retaliatory and criminal acts increased and this resulted in danger and material damage to this graduate student.

There were and are ongoing substantial and material adverse effects on this graduate student for filing the informal and formal grievances, the retaliation complaints and being subjected to an interim suspension, and later, a staged interim suspension hearing, for filing complaints over an alleged financial and academic fraud that has never been investigated. Even if Morales had the luxury of not being aware of the potential fraud. From 2013/14 , onwards, Morales should have known that the program was ineligible as CSUSB is/was allegedly in violation of their WASC accreditation. CSUSB President Morales’ knowledge of the fraud is apparent as the key prominent actor in concealing the academic and financial fraud allegations through co­joining and authorizing subversive retaliatory acts through appointed and/or employed actor subordinates like Milton Clark, Haynes and Karmanova, and through Vasquez, who works under Haynes and thorough the interim HR (Portillo) and dean of students (Satterlund).

Wallace EO 1098 February 11, 2015: Response to EO Questions.

In 2010, CSUSB President Morales, lobbied the US Department of Education for access to student federal loans for the MA TESOL program. Morales had to assure federal officials that the program was accredited and met stringent requirements for federal student loan dollars. Morales either knew or should have known that CSUSB was defrauding the US Department of Education and each and every graduate student that received said federal financial aid and enrolled in that program. If Morales did not know in 2010, the president certainly knew in 2013/14, as the president’s subordinates scrambled through subversive retaliatory acts to conceal the fraud allegations with Morales’ knowledge of the allegations, first hand.

The receipt of federal financial aid was an inadvertent federal offense and an adverse and material act, as this graduate student would have had no idea that the MA TESOL program through a publicly funded California state university was admitting unqualified candidates from South Korea. And that all attempts to address it through California State University, policies, procedures and executive orders, would result in retaliatory acts and the failure of University officials to act within the scope of their positions as public employees.

The actors not only retaliated through subverting the informal and the CSU formal grievance procedure, but the actors also issued an April 29, 2014, directive signed by Haynes’ subordinate, Vasquez. As this student placed calls to the Office of the President, Provost Office, Ombuds Office, Student Affairs Office, to report that the actors were subverting two formal grievances, the actors then, through a written non descriptive directive banned this graduate student from contacting said actors (themselves) as the student’s calls exposed the subversive and retaliatory acts of the actors to subordinate staff. The retaliatory directive was written after the actors had failed to comply with the CSU formal grievance procedure. A March 2014, letter from associate vice chancellor, John Swarbrick, documented that CSUSB had an active grievance procedure and that Milton Clark was the CSUSB personnel responsible. With 30­days remaining to address the two formal grievances the actors wantonly with complete disregard of their positions and CSU policies and executive orders, ignored the chancellor's letter and maintained the retaliation through the intentional failure to follow the procedural processes with the grievance procedure and then cooperatively issued the April directive to muzzle the student from blowing the whistle. The overt acts were subverting the chancellors informational letter, subverting the grievances, and issuing the April directive to further the concealment of the underlying allegations of the academic and financial fraud.

This graduate student then filed a retaliation complaint against said actors for subverting the grievances and issuing the directive (EO 1097: April 2014). The actors with full control and powers of the University, and through an overt act to maintain prior subversive and retaliatory acts refused to allow a neutral party off of the CSUSB campus to facilitate the retaliation investigation. The actors appointed a subordinate interim human resources director to investigation with the prior knowledge that the actors would control and subvert that retaliation investigation through the furtherance of additional retaliatory acts, coercion and subversion of Executive Order 1097.

This subordinate stated in writing that HR was capable of conducting said retaliation investigation but HR sabotages the investigation after HR offers a resolution without any details. This graduate students resolution to HR is to ensure CSUSB would investigate the two formal grievances of which, HR assured would take place earlier in the investigation (because “they have too”). HR’s findings reported that CSUSB had conducted the grievance investigation but HR failed to produce those findings (August 2014). HR at some point in the retaliation investigation starts to subvert and misrepresent the facts. Then, in a confidential August 6, 2014, phone call, HR violated the confidentiality of the call and contacted the very actors that HR was investigating under Executive Order 1097, to report allegations that have since been revealed through testimony to be manufactured by said actors in that this graduate student was falsely accused of stating a “show­down” and the “f**k­you, Vasquez, in the continuum of retaliatory acts to undermine this graduate student and conceal the fraud allegations.

The actors under a thwarted Executive Order 1097 retaliation investigation then issued an August 7th, 2014, interim suspension (Executive Order 1098) based on misrepresenting what HR reported to the actors, which was another in an ongoing series of retaliatory acts to conceal prior retaliatory and subversive acts and the underlying allegations of the financial fraud. The actors then staged an August 25, 2014, IS hearing and shielded one another through allowing select actors who were unable to offer anything beyond revolving scripted hearsay testimony and concealed access to the actual accusers who were never identified; and concealed access to University staff, faculty and other MA TESOL graduate students, that had first hand knowledge that would expose the actors subversive acts and disregard for the facts. The actors played triple subversive and retaliatory roles of, first, setting up and staging the alleged incidents (accusers), second, they then took punitive administrative acts (policy, EO, implementers), and third, retaliated and punished, suspended, this graduate student in the absence of any check and balances and any neutral oversight (trier of the facts). The actors violated EO 1098 through issuing a hearing notice 2.1 days prior to the hearing. The testifying actors (Vasquez and Karmanova) had been earlier accused of retaliation through the concealment of the grievances and subverting an amended complaint with Robert Green, which was never investigated.

The actors ( Morales, Haynes, Satterlund, Vasquez, Karmanova) had full control of the IS hearing and (Bodman, Milton Clark, Haynes, Diaz, Vasquez and Karmanova) earlier controlled and concealed the informal and formal grievances. The IS hearing was an overt act to control the factual narrative and to assure that prior retaliatory acts, while committing new retaliatory acts, were concealed and that this graduate student was punished for exposing CSUSB’s ATM.

In furtherance of the agreement, the actors retained the August 25th transcripts for over five months after testimony that the audio record would be released in 20­business days with the findings (Satterlund). The actors then tampered with the August 25, 2014, audio recording and transcripts. The tampering of the transcripts included the alteration of the testimony of HR with regard to the ­f**k­you, Vasquez­show­down’ allegations and the testimony of the ethics development officer (Vasquez) who took a call from the CSUSB police during testimony to report that this student was physically outside her campus office at that time. HR’s testimony flip flops from August to the November, 2014, hearing and shows gross inconsistencies. HR’s August 25th testimony and those transcripts have been altered. The audio record file’s chain of custody should have been hearing officer, Wallace and Dean Douglas Freer.

The IS hearing coordinator (Satterlund) concealed prior testimony in the August 2014, hearing and maintains a false narrative as the hearing coordinator in the November hearing acting on behalf of all actors and identical to Karmanova and Vasquez’s ever expanding narrative. The roles of the actors are maintained and never switched in furtherance of the agreement to place University policies on their head, retaliate against this graduate student and conceal the underlying fraud allegations.

This false hearsay testimony of Vasquez and Karmanova conflicts with the testimony of actual firsthand witnesses to include a CSUSB police officer, HR, a faculty member (November 2014) and another MA TESOL graduate student in the August 2014, hearing. The CEL dean (Karmanova) retaliated through coordinating with the other actors in the subversion of the informal and formal grievances with Vasquez, Haynes, Bodman, Clark and Morales. The dean’s hearsay testimony is in opposition of the testimony of credible witnesses and the evidence of two CSUSB police officers, HR and colleagues, and later is in opposition of a faculty member (Turpin) under Karmanova, in the November hearing. That faculty member is not called in as an August 25th witness as requested. Karmanova regurgitates the falsely proven narrative in August, again in November, to retaliate against me for attempting  to expose Karmaova’s alleged illegal operations on the University with the other actors. Turpin also violated a Vasquez verbal directive to call the CSUSB police if this graduate student was on campus.

Note: Sandra Vasquez, assumes the role of being the primary victim of this graduate students allegations of threats. Vasquez, was never targeted nor did this graduate student ever see Vasquez as the primary focus or key offender. Vasquez was another actor in the fraud and retaliation and no more significant than Haynes, Karmanova, Bodman or Diaz­Rico, for example. CSUSB President Tomas Morales, has always been the primary focus of these issues. Morales is solely responsible for what takes place at the University and the sound implementation of executive orders and policies. Virtually all calls were made to the Office of the President and not the Student Affairs Office or the College of Extended Learning, with the exception of the Ombuds Office, much earlier on. Vasquez captured the role of the primary victim proven through testimony transcripts in the August 25, 2014, hearing where Vasquez had electronic and telephonic contact with HR Portillo on August 6, 2014, based on the testimony of Vasquez. Again, at that time, Vasquez was under an Executive Order 1097 retaliation investigation through HR.

This is a crucial distinguishing fact. Because Vasquez testified and makes it abundantly clear how fearful she was with their building on “lock­down” and a police presence via Morales. Vasquez claimed she received an August 25, 2014, phone call from the CSUSB police while testifying. Vasquez stated I was outside Vasquez’ campus office when I was in Northern California­­this fact has been concealed through the tampering of the transcripts. And that this graduate student is the most dangerous person Vasquez has ever encountered. Vasquez has every right to feel threatened because Vasquez actions are actionable and exposes criminal offenses, if the system took action and actually worked. Vasquez stated fears are a ruse to ruin my education and wellbeing because the actors careers and wellbeing are more important. The financial and academic fraud is the smoking gun.

Vasquez dramatized the alleged threats but cannot be specific nor does Vasquez offer any witnesses or written evidence to prove Vasquez’ production. Vasquez’ reliance on that false narrative is based on Vasquez’s position as the “Student Conduct and Ethics Development Officer” and that Vasquez is beyond reproach and that President Morales is enabling Vasquez. Vasquez assumed the primary victim role to protect Morales and the other actors and control the “facts.”

Wallace EO 1098 February 11, 2015: Response to EO Questions.

Jake  Al Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

I searched around the Internet to try and find these reports you talk about or anything about a Korean MA TESOL diploma scheme. So can you please post some links we can see.

But one thing I did find was the Demographics of CSUSB.

They had approximatly 20,000 students, actually 20,767 enrolled.

9% of the students are in a Master Program.  6% of the total enrollments are Asian.

Now, employing some simple math.

9% of 20,767 is 1869 students

If 70% of those are Korean, that means that there would be about 1308 Korean students enrolled in your program

However, the total enrollment of Asians is only 1246 students. So not only would every Asian have to be enrolled in a Masters program, every Asian would have to be Korean.  They would still need an additional 62 students to hit your 70%.

I think the actual issue here is what is the REAL reason you got suspended for 9 Months.