Complaint Review: Alterra - Anaheim California

 RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION

SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION

Alterra Pest Control, Complainant

v.

Author of Ripoff Report #1021721

________________________________________________________________________

Complainant Alterra Pest Control (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Anonymous (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com, on February 28, 2013, identified as Ripoff Report No. 1021721 (the “Report”). The Author accused the Complainant of providing ineffective pest control services. The Complainant denied the allegations and contends that the Author is not a former customer, but a competitor. The Author did not submit a response to the Complainant or any contact information. Therefore, in accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration.

In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.

In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included Ripoff Report #1021721 and several Witness Statements provided by the Complainant.

Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement.  The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.     

The Arbitrator determined that the statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.

Decided July 31, 2013

Bruce E. Meyerson, Arbitrator

* A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request.  Please e-mail [email protected] with the name of the Complainant and Report number.

________________________________________________________________________

((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). He definitely used the PG Girlfriend as a distraction to what I thougt I was getting.

((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). (BIG MISTAKE TO PAY BY AUTO CHECK). You lose all leverage if they can simply go to your account and debit for their supposed services.

((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). These guys can do whatever they please when they get access to your bank account,

((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).

In summary, don’t sign any contracts. Check out the com

Thank you.