Print the value of index0
Gregory D. Lee, Mr. Lee was paid $6,500 to write an expert report and affidavit to be used in court. He never followed through or sent either of those things. Sequim, Washington
I contacted Gregory D. Lee about a matter related to the Illinois State Police District 5 undercover CPAT agents and their mishandling of their informant Jacob Wassner, and an illegal recording of me which they had conducted during their investigation in Will County, illinois.
We exchanged numerous emails where I explained the facts of the case in great detail, the things I was alleging, and exactly what evidence I had to substantiate those claims. I explained to Mr Lee that if he thought I was correct in those allegations, then I would hire him to write an expert opinion and an affidavit on my behalf.
After explaining everything and answering his questions, Gregory Lee led me to believe that he agreed with my assessment and could write the expert opinion report and the affidavit I was looking for to substantiate those claims in court.
Because of this, I sent him the documentary evidence, as well as the payment for his services.
What I got back was NOT AT ALL what I expected. First, he sent me an email back listing 5 "mistakes" officers made and told me he didnt know that I was the suspect of the investigation(why that would matter or be relevant to his services, I'm not sure).
Then he went on to criticize me and in his next email suggesting that I "focus on getting my head screwed on right" while I was incarcerated.
Aside from that, he never even wrote the report or affidavit I asked for.
He basically lied and misled me into hiring him and, after making sure the check cleared, sent me an email citing irrelevant and incorrect information about things in the reports in order to justify his new position. This made me question whether he had even actually read the reports at all.
Despite feeling tricked by his bait-n-switch tactic, and despite the weak and incorrect reasons he gave for changing his opinion, I made several good faith attempts to resolve the alleged misunderstanding amicably. I asked that(eventhough I would have liked a full refund) he just please return the unearned $3,900 remaining from the $6,500, or, write the report and affidavit simply explaining the federal requirements and proper procedure for officers recording phone calls.
He did neither. Instead he told me the money was non-refundable, which he never told me prior to this in any of our almost 20 emails we exchanged over the course of 3 weeks. I feel this shows even more that his true aim and intent was deceptive in nature in order to obtain those funds, and it reflects his shady character. After all, if it was merely a misunderstanding, most people would do the right thing and at least refund the difference they hadnt done work to earn. Or even better, make it a point to tell people the important detail that funds are non-refundable.
Mr. Lee chose not only keep the portion of those funds he claimed to have worked for, but also keep the $3,900 unearned remainder, stating that he doesn't give refunds. Personally, I think that's bad business and he should be ashamed of such unprofessionalism.
He was aware of the difficult situation I was in and that my family and I didn't have much money, which makes me feel taken advantage of. I do NOT recommend his services to anyone unless they want to be disappointed. Aside from that, there are others in prison for wire/mail fraud for tricking people into sending them money under false pretense.
2 Updates & Rebuttals
Michael
Joliet,Illinois,
United States
RESPONSE TO THE COMMENT ON MY REPORT
#3Author of original report
Wed, May 15, 2024
Dear Anonymous commenter, Flint: While I appreciate your thoughts and advice to hire a lawyer, the case is done and over, and I am now free. Also, its been 4 yrs and I know theres almost zero chance of getting my money back, and hiring a lawyer to file a civil suit would likely cost more the actual damages. The main point of writing my report about Gregory D Lee was to share my experience with others, so that they could make a fully informed decision if they were thinking about hiring him. But aside from that, you actually helped prove my point- that I was scammed- because anyone who is a 40yr experienced courtroom "expert" like Mr Lee would have most certainly known, and should have disclosed before getting paid, the fact that they could not, or would not, write an affidavit or declaration or some sort of statement about the legalities of my case, instead of agreeing to do so. Perhaps you missed where, in my second paragraph of my Ripoff Report, I said that I explained to Mr Lee in our initial emails (prior to hiring him!) exactly what I was looking for: an expert to write an opinion and an affidavit. And if you read the email I attached to the Ripoff Report, you can see that me hiring Mr. Lee was premised on the fact of: the recording being unlawful, and, the understanding that he would write and send me a opinion report and affidavit. Those were the terms and that was the agreement prior to payment when I pre-screened him. He did not deliver the services we agreed to IN WRITING. Now I don't know what your ethical standards or laws are in Michigan, but in illinois not fulfilling the terms of an agreement is not only a shady business practice, but it's a breach of contract over here. And, I'm pretty sure full-disclosure is the widely accepted better business practice no matter what state you live in. Just saying. Thank you for your comment though! ~Mike
Flint
Rolla,Missouri,
United States
Hire a lawyer
#3General Comment
Mon, May 13, 2024
If you want a defense that might actually have a chance, hire a lawyer. I have no idea what you are trying to accomplish, but it's not going to work. Among other things, you are asking an expert witness to write an affidavit (why?) that comes to a legal conclusion. That would not be admissible in court. First, legal conclusions are drawn by judges, and they don't need help from you or your expert witness. Second, an affidavit is an example of hearsay, which is never admissible. You would have to call the guy in as a witness and have him give testimony and be cross examined by the prosecutor. But that would be pointless because he cannot give any relevant testimony. The argument you want to make is about whether certain evidence should be admissible. There is a very specific time to make that objection, and you have most likely already waived it. Anyway, hire a lawyer and let them do the lawyering. You have no idea what you are doing and it's not going to get you anywhere.